MetEd

@8traq_truth @redpilldispensr It's convection along a frontal boundary. I don't think you grasp the scale of the atmosphere.

@redpilldispensr If you want to understand what you are looking at here, water vapor generation, watch this… rumble.com/v6vlgyb-specia…

Anyone got a logical explanation for what's going on here? 🤔

I love seeing your comedy pop up on my timeline Dan! Also, your boy @BeulerDam said I didn't want to go 'toe to toe' with him, then when I present him with verifiable facts, he gish gallops, deflects like no other, and eventually waved his white flag. He folded like a pretzel and hit that block button pretty fast - exactly like I said he would when he couldn't handle it. At least we can shoot it back and fourth and you take it like a man, so kudos to you. Meanwhile ole Beuler is calling people cucks - so very Christian like 🤔

I feel like 100% cooked from being outside today while getting sprayed on . Also , there is a hour of video missing from goes 19 ..as well as something else going on - looks like there is a possibility the feds tapped into the microphysics , more specifically day time ops , imagery is more washed away , quite a lot actually . @NorthJerseySky your input sir

@BeulerDam More deflection...🥱

see I happen to know they're lying about what happened at the Pentagon, although you might cry the official story that a plane hit, what will make your physics teacher cry as well, is the fact that that plane allegedly defied all known flight physics being flown while under attack by an inexperienced pilot, all to avoid the topography of that area without ever touching one leaf on a tree. and like I said before, like you I covered for their murder I protected them and I continue to lie out of some twisted sense of patriotism until I found out the truth, and rather than just admitting to authority, I actually objectively looked at the evidence it made my own decisions. See you probably believes outer space is real, go ahead and ask your high school physics teacher how you can have a pressurized system next to a vacuum without a solid container . He will explain to you that you can't, and it has never been replicated in any sort of experiment. Yet somehow you still believe that magical gravity which has never been truly explained, admittedly by the top scientists out there, somehow defies the laws of physics to maintain a pressurized system next to a vacuum without a solid container. So you can talk about physics, but the fact is you pick and choose what physics you stick to based on what authority tells you is reality, not based on physics . Every one of your debunking arguments holds no weight against hundreds of hours of examples of cause and effect, like I said before, unless you are legally blind, it's clear as day.

Wow! 629 views with 8 reshares and nearly 4k followers. look out Tucker Carlson here I come . On a real note, at least I know I'm sharing Truth that the controllers don't want me to share. many in the Truth community I think they're fighting against the enemy but they're actually just sharing truths the enemy wants out, with the intent of eroding man's trusting man and current power structures so we consent to AI Lordship.

That's Non-Uniform Beam filling, a known phenomena in radar meteorology as I've state before. LEARN how to interpret radar. Don't be ignorant and dismiss it just to confirm your beliefs. You have not refuted this. Humans are notorious for seeking patterns connecting dots where things may or may not exist. That's exactly what you are doing and calling it evidence.

@MetEduc @SystemNormal @nexrad101 deny your eyeballs all you want, just to be clear once again you are covering for murderers.

Ahh yes, the Robert Fletcher testimony from the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Terrorism hearing regarding the U.S. militia movement. (c-span.org/program/senate… at 2:10:35). Fletcher, a rep for the Montana Militia (not an expert in the subject matter, whistleblower, or intelligence official) made UNSUBSTANTIATED claims about "weather control techniques/devices". When pressed, he said: "We have a complete package on that which I did not bring, but I certainly will see to it that it is brought in for the record" - including patents and "Senator Claiborne Pell’s complete statement." 30+ years later? No package, no patents, and no Pell documents were ever submitted. The attributed Pell quote about "weather wars" being "the greatest weapon ever created" appears nowhere in any of his actual speeches or Senate records - it only exists in this testimony The Senate called these militia leaders in after the OKC bombing specifically to understand the radical beliefs fueling domestic terrorism at the time. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - of which he failed to bring or provide. Most people do not understand atmospheric scale or the insane power it would take to actually manipulate weather on any meaningful level - it's astronomical. Patents are not proof that something works; they just protect ideas. Real techniques like cloud seeding do exist, but that's not "weather control." It's simply nudging a storm to precipitate a tiny bit more by exploiting microphysical processes.

@MetEduc @SystemNormal @nexrad101 x.com/b_gimpl1234/st…

@BeulerDam @SystemNormal @nexrad101 My handler is totally fine with the reach, but my high school physics teacher, on the other hand, is crying.

@MetEduc @SystemNormal @nexrad101 if you have a handler, they won't be happy your giving my videos reach

Yes, that is a rendering glitch on the @QuadWeather website. It's also TDWR which is not part of the NEXRAD network. It's supplemental network owned, operated and maintained by the FAA to detect microbursts and windshear for aviation safety. No form of remote sensing is perfect. For the high spatial and temporal resolution TDWR provides, it's better than flying blind. Before TDWR, there were several plane crashes due to wind shear.

@nexrad101 @BeulerDam @MetEduc There's too much crackle. What's the point if you have to interpret every loop for anomalies? I actually have hobbies I enjoy. This not so much. This ain't much different than my job. I'm going to go ahead and call this a glitch.

@BeulerDam @SystemNormal @nexrad101 Oh I do want to go "toe to toe" with you, Mr. Tough Guy. I'll respond to your other claims here in a bit, but I'm sure you'll just block like all the others do when they've got nothing to stand on. Your choice.

@MetEduc @SystemNormal @nexrad101 If you have a handler, you should ask him if it's a good idea to go toe to toe with me, and find out historically what ends up happening.

Radars are NOT passive, nor do they affect weather - I explained this to you yesterday. You still haven’t shown how they could possibly do it, and the videos you do have just show you misinterpreting radar and proving you have no idea what you are looking at. You seeing a 'beam' on radar that you don't understand and calling it a DEW is classic confirmation bias. When the facts don’t support your theory, the deflection starts - "fluoride", "satanic magic", "you're a fed", "9/11", and all the usual predictable stuff. If you have actual evidence of the mechanism, share it. Otherwise this is just confirmation bias. Facts hurt when they contradict your narrative.

@MetEduc @SystemNormal @nexrad101 here's 2 hours of real man made climate change and proof that all the so called passive radar glitches are in fact directly connected to the extended weather events. i stopped drinking fluoride a long time ago. so your satanic magic has little effect on me anymore.

If we loop through all elevation scans (or tilts) from the exact same volume scan (one moment in time), you can see the 'donut hole' start to fill in as the elevation angle increases (the angle is in the bottom left). This is because the beam is sampling higher in the atmosphere where the snow layer actually is.

@SystemNormal @nexrad101 @BeulerDam Also, VCP34 is the newest Volume Coverage Pattern that became available in Build 23 in late 2024. You can learn more about it here: training.weather.gov/wdtd/buildTrai…

That's exactly what's going on. Check out the sounding from KSGF. This is a vertical temperature profile. Red is temperature, green id dewpoint. The closer they are together, the more humid the air is. It's extremely dry from ~3km on down, and moist above it. There is snow aloft and as it falls into that dry layer, it sublimates.

@redpilldispensr Convection along a frontal boundary.

🤣It's not about the whole atmospheric profile, it's about very thin ice supersaturated layers (RHi >= 100%). Also, you literally DO NOT know how to read IR satellite, and it's embarrassing who for someone who seems to think they are God's gift to mankind in meteorology. It's OK to admit you're wrong. x.com/MetEduc/status…

No one ever said they didn't exist until 20 yrs ago. What people noticed was they were far more repeated than before...then they started appearing in atmospheric profiles with RH <30%, then they started appearing on IR images at reflective temps >-10C where they shouldn't be less than -40C. All these observations swept under the rug to keep a narrative going. A narrative partially operated by a guy that has REPEATEDLY LIED about me and my weather abilities and HARRASSED ME personally for 24 years. This clown Jay Reynolds tried to get me expelled from MSState in August...too late Jay I already graduated! If your BIGGEST mouth piece is Jay Reynolds whom dedicated his life to it's just contrails, whom has told LIES about me for 24 years, then you're entire premise with just being innocent contrails is probably wrong.

If condensation trails never existed prior to 20 years ago, then why are there photos of them dating back to 1940? There are more contrails in the sky now because there is a lot more air traffic. But they aren’t a new phenomenon.

1. NEXRAD is not a passive radar. It's active, meaning it transmits electromagnetic energy (short microwave pulses: S-band, 2.7-3.0 GHz) and listens for the return which are then processed and plotted. 2. It has ZERO ability to affect the weather due to it's power output and frequency used. Some fairly simple physics can prove this. No other evidence has shown otherwise, and no, exploiting known anomalies/artifacts/limitations from NEXRAD to push your "DEW's" nonsense without understanding how radar works or how to read and interpret it is not evidence. Your just proving to everyone you have no idea what you're looking at. 3. The reason you are seeing "beams", or a "radial valley" of low values on the Correlation Coefficient product is due to non-uniform beam filling (NBF or NUBF), not DEW's or NEXRAD weather manipulation. NBF is a well-documented and understood phenomena in radar meteorology, and can cause significant data quality issues. It's pretty complex, but essentially it results from an uneven distribution of drop sizes and/or types (hail, rain) within the beam volume (typically in the vertical) causing a drop in CC. This can occur in a few scenarios, especially one where the storms are aligned along the radial as in the case in SystemNormal's post where a line of thunderstorms has erupted along a cold front.

just "passive" radars and "glitches that have no effect on weather" they say 🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️ How much fluoride is too much?🤣💀

@OklahomanRay @wxman7313 @Cjpearson x.com/MetEduc/status…

@OklahomanRay @wxman7313 @Cjpearson Here we go with the NDA nonsense again that the cult leader Wigington pushed and that neither he nor his gullible followers actually understand 🙄

I’m starting to think meteorology is fake.

@TakeThatClouds Here's a 5min temporal resolution version. col.st/6b4pj

Mr Gimpl here highlights a classic contrail progression associated with this mass of humid air. Made more notable by the prominent looping trails.

Great, since you are aware of common radar patterns such as interference, you agree what you are calling 'rippled radar' is in fact bistatic coupling, or interference between two radars? That is, Radar A transmits a pulse of electromagnetic energy into the storm, the energy is scattered in all directions off hydrometeors (any liquid or solid water particle) in the storm, and gets inadvertently picked up by Radar B which is actively listening to the same part of the storm. Because Radar B did not send that pulse, the timing of the pulse doesn't match what Radar B is expecting, and plots the echoes incorrectly on the radar display. That's all it is. But let's roll with your theory that it's not NEXRAD (that it's only picked up on NEXRAD in the form of bistatic coupling), and I'll show you the issues that arise in it. Let say there is some 'frequency tech' out there. First off, you made the claim that this tech seems to exist, so you need provide the proof of that. What frequency, power source, mechanism of action on the storm? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Second, for this 'frequency tech' to be picked up by a NEXRAD radar, it MUST be using the same frequency, or within the bandwidth that that radar's receiver is tuned to pick up - otherwise NEXRAD will NOT pick it up. NEXRAD only operates in the S-band at 2.7-3 GHz. For example, the KILX radar in Lincoln, IL transmits at 2.805 GHz. The receiver is tuned to listen for that center frequency plus a very narrow bandwidth: 636 KHz in short pulse mode and 212 KHz in long pulse mode. That is, the radar can ONLY pick up frequencies between 2.804682-2.805318 GHz in short pulse and 2.804894-2.805106 GHz in long pulse. Checking the transmit frequencies of the radars nearby, KMKX in Milwaukee, WI transmits on the same frequency as KILX and is the likely culprit for the bistatic coupling. I've attached radar images from KMKX and KILX at the time of the storms. BOTH are having bistatic coupling issues. Third (the fatal flaw): Even if we pretend this isn't NEXRAD, but some other 'frequency tech' operating in that same range so it shows up on the radar, the physics of the electromagnetic spectrum make storm manipulation mathematically impossible. Frequencies in the 2.7–3.0 GHz range are notoriously terrible at interacting with water or water vapor. That is exactly why meteorologists use them to look at and through heavy rain. At these wavelengths, atmospheric attenuation is incredibly low (~0.01 dB/km). To put that into perspective, a maximum of only 0.23% of a wave's energy is lost per kilometer of travel. And crucially, almost all of that tiny fraction is simply scattered in different directions to give us the return echoes we see - not absorbed. Because water refuses to absorb energy at this specific frequency in any meaningful way, you would need an astronomically massive power source to force a physical change (like heating or evaporating) into the cloud. A single, average thunderstorm produces and releases energy on the order of 10^15 Joules, roughly the energy equivalent of a multi-megaton nuclear weapon. There is no human technology, power grid, or transmitter on Earth capable of generating and beaming enough energy into a storm to overcome that near-zero absorption rate and physically compete with a storm's natural thermodynamics. I know you don't think it's NEXRAD, but as an example, a NEXRAD transmits at 750kW, but due to a low duty cycle, averages about 1.2-1.5kW, or 1,200-1,500 Joules per second. Scaling that up, in one hour, that's 4.32x10^6-5.40x10^6 Joules. To match the energy of a storm, it would need to run continuously for 21,139-26,406 years! And this assumes 100% energy transfer, but remember, thanks to the 0.23% attenuation per kilometer we showed earlier, only a microscopic fraction of those Joules would even interact with a storm in the first place, so we know it's significantly longer! So, if you shoot S-band frequencies at a storm, the vast majority of the energy simply passes right through and out into space. Thinking you can steer or modify a 10^15 Joule storm with an S-band frequency weapon is like trying to boil the ocean with a laser pointer. Physics and math don't bend to the patterns you see. Most people do not understand the scale of the atmosphere, and humans are notorious for finding patterns, but that doesn't mean all things are linked. And as stated before, the reason you only see this interference when there are storms is because you have more opportunities for the beam to scatter off of hydrometeors and back into another radars receiver.

@MetEduc NEXRAD Doppler radar doesn’t manipulate tornadoes. What I’m suggesting is a clear pattern and a possible involvement of frequency utilizing tech that is separate to Doppler. And I’m well aware of radar artifacts/reflection/interference, yes.

🚨POSSIBLE TORNADO MANIPULATION IN N CENTRAL U.S.A RIGHT NOW. (Illinois, Michigan area). Odd radar activity began earlier this afternoon.