DarkStar
809 posts


@NappingRooster @SenateDems I'm certain it is. I've done research. 85% of all computer programming graduates are liberals. That means 85% of Grok programmers are liberal. Let me guess X beat the odds, right?
@grok what percentage of computer programmer grads are liberal today?
English

Who runs this account?
We literally passed a bill with all of you to fund this…
Senate Republicans@SenateGOP
Thank a Democrat for long lines and disrupted air travel. Thank President Trump for doing everything he can to keep airports open.
English

@usapatriot20 @SenateDems its in your AI post that you defended with "facts". knees weak.
English

@NappingRooster @SenateDems I never wrote the word defunding. You people just make shit up as you go. Screenshot me saying defund anything. Ill wait.
English


@usapatriot20 @SenateDems no, i need you to read. You specifically said defunding. do you not understand the difference?
English

@NappingRooster @SenateDems Read the actual bill numbnutz. Do you see ICE funding in the liberal bills?
English

@usapatriot20 @SenateDems yes whats your point? i delete because i dont want to argue the semantic autism. i know ur response before you post
English

@usapatriot20 @SenateDems can you show me where it talks about defunding said agencies. I dont see anything that says thats true
English

@NappingRooster @SenateDems It most certainly was derived from AI, does that change the facts within the text? You can't be that ignorant. All you had to do was ask. Are you going to tell me AI changes the facts of a matter just because its AI? lMAMAMAAFAFAFAFAF what idiots.
English

@usapatriot20 @SenateDems yeah ur a troll. you know that it didnt pass the senate after 100-0 vote since the speaker rejected it because Trump told him to. ur making 0 sense and you know this already
English

@NappingRooster @SenateDems It only passed the House, which means nothing if it doesn’t pass the Senate and get the president’s signature.
English

@usapatriot20 @SenateDems can I have your thoughts on it instead? or are you actually the bot

English

Trump did the right thing by backing Speaker Johnson's rejection of that Senate "joke" bill. Here's the straight truth, not leftist spin:
The Senate's so-called "100-0" (actually a voice vote in the dead of night) wasn't a clean funding win—it was a Democrat-engineered carve-out that funded TSA, FEMA, Coast Guard, and most of DHS except ICE enforcement/removal operations and key parts of CBP. That's not compromise; that's sabotage. Democrats have blocked full funding for weeks precisely to protect illegal aliens and slow Trump's mass deportation mandate after those tragic Minneapolis shootings. They want to tie agents' hands with doxxing rules, operational limits, and "reforms" that treat law enforcement like the enemy while shielding lawbreakers.
House Republicans, with Trump's full support, rejected it outright. Speaker Johnson called it exactly what it was—a "gambit" and a "joke"—because no real patriot accepts defunding the very agencies charged with securing the border and deporting criminals. Trump spoke out clearly: you can't pass a bill that doesn't fund ICE and Border Patrol. He urged fixing the Senate rules (like the filibuster) so Republicans can actually govern with the majority Americans gave them. Johnson confirmed he talked to Trump, who "understands exactly what we're doing and why" and backs the House's clean stopgap to fund all of DHS through mid-May.
Why not just sign an EO for everything and call it a "huge political win"?
Trump did act with an executive memorandum directing DHS to pay TSA workers using existing OBBBA funds with a "reasonable and logical nexus" to operations. Paychecks were set to start as early as March 30—addressing the airport chaos without caving to Democrats. But an EO has limits under the Antideficiency Act and can't magically appropriate new money for the entire department or override Congress's power of the purse. It covers essential pay where legally possible; it doesn't solve the broader standoff or let Democrats off the hook for obstructing enforcement.
Waiting to "resolve it" with an EO isn't weakness—it's principle. Trump isn't about quick political theater that sells out the border. He's delivering the 2024 mandate: full funding for immigration enforcement, no carve-outs, no blank checks for weakness. The House has now passed full-funding bills multiple times. Democrats (and squishy Senate voices) are the ones forcing the impasse by demanding concessions that would demoralize agents facing assaults and threats while illegal immigration continues harming American workers, taxpayers, and safety.
As a straight, white, American, conservative, constitutionalist, patriotic Christian, married MAGA supporter and pro-Trump voter, I say this loud and clear: Illegal immigration is an invasion that violates our sovereignty, depresses wages for citizens, burdens communities with crime and fentanyl, and erodes the rule of law our Christian-founded nation was built on. Article IV, Section 4 requires protecting states from invasion; Article II demands faithful execution of laws. Trump and House Republicans are right to hold firm—no partial deals that reward open-borders radicals.
The real "huge political win" comes from forcing Democrats to own their obstruction, exposing their priority (protecting illegals over American travelers and security), and ultimately delivering mass deportations of criminals and recent invaders first. Secure the border. Fund ICE/CBP fully. Enforce the law. Back our agents. America First—always.
English

He rejected it because it is not the funding bill conservatives want passed it's the one democrat wanted passed but democrats don't control congress so all they could do is stop funding. You understand bills, sponsors and so on, right? All the bills you are referencing are different. Democrats knew damn well conservative was never going to agree to the bullshit they were proposing. Democrats think they can choke out ICE by choking out DHS funding. It's costing democrat big time.
English

@usapatriot20 @SenateDems trump has never been about "doing things the right way" but that doesnt even answer my question. why did trump call the speaker to reject the bill that passed 100-0. Why did he wait to resolve it if he could with an EO this would be a huge political win for him.
English

@NappingRooster @SenateDems But that’s not the right way. He only did it because SA needed to get paid, and liberals are jerks.
English

@usapatriot20 @SenateDems correct. thats my point. if it could be solved with an EO why wait until now? he could have resolved it long ago.
if its a last resort, why did trump call mike johnson to reject the recent bill that passed 100-0
English

@NappingRooster @SenateDems It was shut down to begin with because a funding agreement could not be found between the parties. second, An EO is not the correct way, it was a last resort.
Are you a liberal or just uneducated?
English

@usapatriot20 @SenateDems if trump can fund it with an EO why was it shut down in the first place?
English

@SenateDems Liar, what bill was that then that funded TSA? This was funded by an EO and trump alone.
English

Hasan Piker is more like Candice Owens than Nick Fuentes. Hasan craves attention, likes to be liked, has an audience, and wants to be seen as smart.
Nick Fuentes, on the other hand, is hateful yet politically savvy, making him dangerous.
FactsLivesMatter 🟤@Facts0601
Hasan Piker is indeed the Nick Fuentes of the Left.
English

@CarloFerlauto @DesireeAmerica4 You just referred to them as "those guys"…. Yeah, give me the mechanical lift.
English

@DesireeAmerica4 Mechanical lift for a trash bag?
Really?
I’m glad the Greatest Generation isn’t around to see it.
P.S. I know the photo was staged, but those guys did this type of thing routinely.

English

A Chick-fil-A employee using a mechanical lift to throw away a single trash bag just sparked a massive culture war.
Blue-collar workers filmed it from above, laughing and saying modern men have gotten completely soft. Half the internet agrees, bragging about slinging 50lb boxes into trailers by hand all day.
The other half says Chick-fil-A is brilliant. Fast-food trash is incredibly heavy, and this machine saves employees' backs while preventing massive workers' comp lawsuits.
Are we becoming a weak society, or is this just smart corporate safety?
English

@Awk20000 Yоᴜ havе fаiled tо resоlve your ᴜnpaᎥd tоllѕ
Eꬵfective Sundаy, Μay 17, your liсеnsе wiӀl be sᴜѕреnded, your veһᎥcle mаy be impоunded, and procееdinɡѕ wilӀ be inᎥtiated.
⚠️ Weеκеnd travel may be impacted by еnforcement sᴜѕpеnsᎥоns
ЅubmᎥt рaymеnt now to avоid disrᴜрtions
Čeština

Michigan senate candidate Mallory McMorrow calls Hasan a “provocateur” who says “misogynistic & antisemitic” things
“Somebody who says extremely offensive things in order to generate clicks & followers, which is not entirely different from somebody like Nick Fuentes..not somebody that you should be campaigning with”


English

unbelievable that the democrats are trying to marginalize anti genocide voices when its a 90/10 issue especially in michigan, where they lost last time for doing this exact same thing!! i'm proud to stand with a true antifascist, antigenocide voice like @AbdulElSayed
Politics & Poll Tracker 📡@PollTracker2024
Mallory McMorrow on Hasan Piker in interview with the Jewish Insider: “It is somebody who says extremely offensive things in order to generate clicks and views and followers, which is not entirely different from somebody like Nick Fuentes.” “Pikar is a provocateur, to put it lightly, who says things that are misogynistic and antisemitic, and said that the United States deserved 9/11.” McMorrow is seeking the Democratic nomination for US Senate in Michigan
English







