OrangeCLK

@affe_is_me animations.dev/vocabulary

很少见 DESIGN.md 里有关于怎么做动画的描述。 朋友们让 AI 写网页动画效果一般是怎么操作的呀。

@ludamn513 嗯，我觉得迭代中很重要的一点就是在实现的过程中人类去补充缺失的需求细节。有时候人有很多隐藏上下文和决策结果，为模型所不知，人不看到产物也不知道模型不知道。Loop不能给模型补充信息，所以起不到“迭代”进而优化的作用。

@OrangeCLK 看下底层的实现就知道 就是在每个 turn 结束的时候注入一遍提示词 如果目标明确可以解决之前任务主动中断的问题 但是只要目标定义不清晰 AI就是疯狂拉屎 最终把代码变得十分恶心

Loop这个想法是经不起推敲的

Caixin's @caixin piece on this is worth reading slowly, and to my mind one of the best explanations of the new rule to come out of China. Setting the examples aside, here is what is most worth watching in the regulation itself, including the parts that are easy to miss. 1. It is China's first dedicated, top-level law on outbound investment. Rules that were scattered across several ministries are now consolidated into a single administrative regulation with real legal force, which lifts the whole area from departmental practice to national law. This is the step a maturing system takes once the activity it governs grows large enough to need one clear rulebook. 2. The framework now covers individuals, not only companies. Personal offshore investment, and the red-chip and VIE structures behind many Chinese tech firms, used to be handled piecemeal, mostly through foreign-exchange registration. Bringing them into one framework closes a long-standing gap and gives investors a single set of rules to follow. 3. It covers technology, not only money and equity. Licensing core technology, sending engineers, giving cross-border technical guidance, training staff abroad and building offshore R&D can now be assessed. The aim is to keep controlled key technology from being moved out through indirect routes that the old, equity-focused rules never reached. 4. National security review becomes a standalone safeguard. It used to be one consideration folded into the approval; now it is a dedicated review run jointly by several ministries, so security questions are weighed on their own terms. For projects touching key technology, important data, strategic resources or critical industries, that review applies in its own right. 5. Oversight now runs the full length of an investment, before, during and after, and it follows the money through. It also covers reinvestment by entities already based offshore, which closes the gap where setting up abroad first used to sit outside the rules. The point is a complete framework with no blind spots. 6. Its center of gravity is protective and inward-facing. Where American-style review is mainly about cutting off money to a rival's industries, this rule is more about safeguarding China's own strengths, rare earths, battery technology, manufacturing know-how, from leaving the country. Protecting core capabilities that took decades to build is something every major economy does. 7. It includes countermeasures, and they are defensive by design. The rule connects to China's anti-sanctions and foreign-trade laws, giving Beijing a clear legal basis to respond when its companies face discriminatory or extraterritorial measures abroad. It also lines outbound investment up with export controls and data security, so the parts of the system work together. 8. A good deal of the detail is still to come, and that is deliberate. The catalogs of encouraged, restricted and prohibited industries, the specific rules for individuals, and the security-review procedures will follow. The framework and its direction are set, and the operational detail is being built on top of it. One last thing. It is easy to read this as a wall going up. The more accurate read is that China, now the world's third-largest outbound investor, is doing what every major economy has already done, putting clear and unified rules around capital that used to move under scattered departmental notices. Openness on this scale needs a framework to hold its shape, and that is what this rule builds. #China #USChina #Trade #ODI #SupplyChain

烈日无荫，极端高温正威胁足球新星 dialogue.earth/zh/3/60133881/

英国学生遇害案引发激辩，警方被指对白人受害者存在偏见 cn.wsj.com/articles/stude… 来自 @ChineseWSJ

Florida’s attorney general sued OpenAI and Sam Altman, claiming the company and its chief executive knowingly released an unsafe product and ignored warnings that it could harm users wsj.com/tech/ai/openai… 来自 @WSJ

Citing 'severe' math deficits, UC faculty demand a return to SAT tests for STEM applicants latimes.com/california/sto…

The windfall earned by Asian chip makers is coursing through the world economy, mirroring on a global scale the circular flow of money within the AI ecosystem bloomberg.com/news/articles/…

有名有姓的专家学者机构的高质量的分析，看不过来，或者觉得都一样，或者看不懂，总是找一些乱七八糟狗屁不通的信息来源，总觉得后面有高人，民间高手，或者有什么特别神奇的来源，就是特别奇怪的一种思考方式

@foxshuo economy.caixin.com/2026-05-08/102…

「财新」当期出刊特稿：经济复苏了吗？ - 结论是肯定的，Q1的GDP涨了5个点，出口和工业生产两大引擎还在快速增长，去年出现下降的固定资产投资也回到微增趋势，最重要的是PPI在3月同比转正，走出了连续41个月为负值的低谷，价格水平的改善是最明确的证据； - 出口增速高达14.7%，相当强劲，而且质量很高，代表新动能的机电产品占到了出口总额的六成以上，而且基于中国加工贸易的模式，出口繁荣也反过来拉动了进口数据超预期的大增22.7%； - 供应强于需求、外需强于内需的结构依然保持，消费、地产、居民收入等薄弱板块与大盘轻微背离，体感上的温差确实存在； - 主流经济学理论是期待通胀的，尤其是剔除掉能源波动的通胀回升，以及房地产的跌幅收窄，这些迹象的出现才意味着内需走强，必须摆脱低物价的困扰，目前来看，除了PPI，CPI也在回涨，这都是乐观信号； - 如果分得更细一点，生产资料是有在涨价，生活资料却还在下跌，意味着上下游剪刀差扩大，直接面向消费端的下游企业会比较难受，没有完全摆脱增收不增利的陷阱； - 上市公司的人均工资收入也在去年成功止跌，虽然没有大幅增加，但至少不再处于下行阶段，经济学家认为宏观复苏的既定节奏传递到个人收入上是有滞后性的，商品涨价-企业增收-扩大投入-工资增长的完整循环可能还要等上几个季度甚至更久； - 固定资产投资的反弹取决于AI基建热潮和国家政策托底的双重拉动，财政支出在Q1完成年初预算的速度为近5年最快，服务于数据中心、新能源汽车的电力投资也是亮点； - 地方政府的化债形势仍然严峻，因为土地出让收入一直在萎缩，叠加付息支出之后压力很大，但监管起来既不能过于严苛，也不能放任不为，只要兜底原则持续，就不会出现无法解决的问题，需要和时间做朋友，循序消化出清。

@9hills @kevinma_dev_zh Claude Code可以主动不兼容别的模型

@kevinma_dev_zh 模型厂商没必要再维护自家的 Agent 架构，做好 Claude Code/Pi 之类的主流 Agent的兼容即可。

用 kimi cli 快用吐了，我把一个很简单的任务丢给它，都能改错文件。正常的 agent 都能根据我说的组件的关键词去找到正确的文件名，它却不能。

@mranti 确实是不太行，GLM 系列我觉得还要更好一些。

我在用Claude Code接Deepseek V4 Pro，刚刚开始试，手感是 Kimi 2.6 > Deepseek V4 Pro > Kimi 2.5。不知道大家有没同感？

虽然这句话打击面有点广，会有误伤，但大抵如此。比如那些喷公众平台不够开放的，基本是他娘的搞灰产的。如果对他们足够友好，那整个平台就会变成垃圾场。

@wong2__ 有没有觉得Cursor比Claude Code好用？

最近厌倦了在Claude Code和Codex间来回横跳，我又用回Cursor（agent模式）了。。

Reed Hastings to step down from Netflix board axios.com/2026/04/16/net…