Pascal Kaufmann

890 posts

Pascal Kaufmann banner
Pascal Kaufmann

Pascal Kaufmann

@PascalKaufmann

Neuro scientist-turned-entrepreneur & founder of @Starmind and @mindfire_global. Pushing the limits of the unknown, devoted to the creation of man-like AI.

Zürich, Switzerland Sumali Ocak 2012
91 Sinusundan1.2K Mga Tagasunod
Pascal Kaufmann nag-retweet
China Xinhua News
China Xinhua News@XHNews·
At the just concluded Europe-Asia Economic Summit (EAES) in Davos, Switzerland, many European tech leaders hailed China's advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and expected closer collaboration with China in AI innovation and application. #GLOBALink
English
2
4
8
5K
Pascal Kaufmann nag-retweet
The Humanoid Hub
The Humanoid Hub@TheHumanoidHub·
New video of Protoclone by Clone Robotics – a synthetic human with over 200 degrees of freedom and over 1,000 artificial muscles. It’s gonna look wild once it starts walking.
English
237
376
2K
455.8K
Pascal Kaufmann nag-retweet
François Chollet
François Chollet@fchollet·
My views on nature vs nurture: 1. Humans are intelligent from the very beginning. From the first year of their life, they have a high ability to adapt to new situations and efficiently acquire new skills. 2. Almost all knowledge is acquired. Humans are born with very little prior knowledge about the world. They don't have a pre-trained visual system -- they must learn to see. They don't have a pre-trained gait-generation program -- they must learn to walk. Etc. 3. Early knowledge/skills acquisition is strongly guided by metacognitive priors, which is why everyone acquires essentially the same Core Knowledge foundations, under roughly the same timeline, despite experiencing very different environments. 4. How intelligent you are is largely determined by your genes -- it's how your brain is wired. Environmental factors (pollutants, malnutrition, sensory deprivation, trauma...) can lower your intelligence but cannot meaningfully increase it. 5. Intelligence decreases with age. My 3 year old is smarter than me. Which makes perfect sense, because as you age you can trade-off fluid intelligence for crystallized skills. The less you know the more valuable intelligence is.
François Chollet@fchollet

Humans are *born* intelligent. They're not formless curves fitted to a data distribution over a lifetime. Just because you only have a hammer doesn't mean that everything in the world must be hammer-shaped.

English
54
73
634
126.4K
François Chollet
François Chollet@fchollet·
The only reliable test of fluid understanding is a benchmark you cannot memorize, a game you cannot practice for -- like ARC, where each task is intended to be novel and never seen before.
English
6
7
197
26.1K
Pascal Kaufmann nag-retweet
François Chollet
François Chollet@fchollet·
Before eventually morphing into a mystical quest to create the Philosopher's Stone, Alchemy started in Hellenistic Egypt as a collection of chemical recipes for creating fake gold and fake gemstones. Besides the parallels between later-days Alchemy and the modern quest for AGI, I'm stuck by the parallels between early Alchemy and the Turing test. "Can we engineer our way towards fooling at least some people into believing they're holding a chunk of real gold?" vs "can we engineer our way towards fooling at least some people into believing they're talking to a human?"
English
13
26
244
48.7K
Pascal Kaufmann nag-retweet
François Chollet
François Chollet@fchollet·
When you talk to young folks, they think that the belief in imminent AGI was caused by the rise of LLMs. In reality, this belief is axiomatic and long predates LLMs. DeepMind, Vicarious were founded in 2010 based on this belief. OpenAI in 2015. Interest in LLMs only began in 2019. In 2015, when deep learning was in its infancy and LLMs were years away, many folks were just as convinced that AGI was around the corner as they are today. The only thing that changed is that people are now anchoring these beliefs on LLMs, whereas in 2015 they were looking to Deep RL, LSTMs, and Neural Turing Machines.
English
81
217
1.5K
378K
Sheikh Shafayat
Sheikh Shafayat@shafayat_sheikh·
@fchollet I wonder, how do you think GPT4’s performance would be on ARC dataset? Now that it can input image, we can actually verify this
English
1
0
0
632
Pascal Kaufmann nag-retweet
yonatan
yonatan@zozuar·
float i,e,R,s,x,y,z;vec3 a,q,p,d=.5-FC.rgb/r.y;for(q.yz--,a=q;i++<1e2;i>76.?e+=1e-4,d=a:d){e*=R;p=q+=d*e*.5;o+=log(++e+cos(z/6.+vec4(0,1,2,0))*.3)/1e2;p=vec3(log(R=length(p))-t*.5,e=-p.z/R,atan(p.x,p.y));for(z=s=1.;s<1e2;s+=s)e+=exp(x=sin(y=PI*(dot(cos(p*s),p/p)))-1.4)/s,z+=x/y;}
Español
67
929
6.5K
503.8K
Pascal Kaufmann nag-retweet
François Chollet
François Chollet@fchollet·
It's hard to take seriously someone who talks about how "AGI" is imminent yet cannot give you a precise definition of what they mean by "intelligence" or tell you how it works in principle
English
73
109
928
353.6K