𝙻𝚒𝚕𝚒 ☭

"The attitude of a political party towards its own mistakes is one of the most important and surest ways of judging how earnest the party is and how it in practice fulfils its obligation towards its class and the toiling masses." V.I. Lenin Left Wing Communism

This person suffers from making quips instead of proper analysis so their points even when correct come off as silly and nonconvincing

I also agree with their point that there needs to be more organization within blue-collar labour instead of the intelligentsia. The USA is in dire need of organized labour outside of the very few yellow unions

People are being dumb in my comments. Teachers are not inherently good in 97% of cases they uphold capitalism. The issue is the incorrect analysis and generalization. Being negative towards the intelligentsia isn't entirely wrong.

@jizzeringjezza They bring up their disagreeing with the concept of a labour aristocracy in a comment under their post, so I inferred they meant class character. Sorry if I came off argumentative

@Plus_Lilith That reads as a pretty standard attack against academia, is the thing. I don't want to get into a back and forth, really. x.com/SwampCommunist…

It's a description of their ideological character.

when I mean petit-bourgeois i mean in class character not in ideology these are two separate things.

professors are not inherently petit-bourgeois this is a failure to give actual nuance and correct analysis for the sake of quips. Some* professors are but this is only if they leverage their expertise to create books but this is not exclusive to them nor other skilled labourers

@jizzeringjezza the majority of the intelligentsia* some may differ but this is not nearly as likely

@jizzeringjezza there is a difference in these. I never once disagreed that the intelligentsia under capitalism upholds capitalism. I would consider all labour aristocrats and only some are actually petit-bourgeoisie.

When you got a annoying mf trying to 'debate you'

@Fan8824 Thank you for the words of wisdom mr Khrushchev

@SunGodNika1914 they can been seen similarly to police unions which are used to keep the proletariats within these jobs from resisting capitalism by appeasing them. In this they are labour aristocrats but this does not make them bourgeoise

@SunGodNika1914 i didnt mean to keep that last sentence. To expand to stop confusion, many of the things which confuses OP are caused by Union effort and the betterment in treatment for the proletariat. Although atleast in the USA teacher unions have become yellow unions and tools of capitalism.

Hmm. Before?

Who's music discography should I finish first

subsistence farmers retired in their mid 40s because they literally could not continue working due to the strain of the labour and most relied on child labour. We should not be glorifying these conditions.

"Comme le GOAT Karl Marx." - Autonomie de classe, 2024