Rebecca Smith
46.4K posts

Rebecca Smith
@RebB52
Southern girl that loves God, family and country. 🇺🇲💖🇺🇸





If Elon Musk paid my ultra-millionaire wealth tax, we could pay for child care for all three and four year olds in America.

“Texas Senate candidate James Talarico, 37, has a single checking account that holds up to $50,000—and he shares it with his mother, a frequent contributor to his political campaigns who pitched in to cover Talarico’s moving expenses when he was 32, records show,” @peterjhasson - freebeacon.com/democrats/texa…



Dear Republican Senate, We stand with American Patriot Senator Mike Lee. Sincerely, The voters who gave you the majority so you could pass bills like the SAVE America Act.




EXCLUSIVE: 🚨Senator John Thune’s daughter was the Director of a PAC that gave money to anti-Trump and radical leftist Democrats🚨 Senator John Thune’s @SenJohnThune daughter Brittany Thune Lindberg served as Director and vice president of The Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers PAC, aka Council PAC from February 2013 - June 2021. During Brittany Thune-Lindberg’s tenure at the PAC, multiple anti-Trump radical leftists were rewarded with generous monetary contributions, including: Nancy Pelosi Mikie Sherrill Hakeem Jeffries Jamie Raskin Jon Tester Katherine Clark Sherrod Brown How can Thune be trusted as the Senate GOP leader, a position that would allow him to have control over Senate funds, when his own daughter, who he referred to as “gifted” and “an accomplished professional” on X, gave money to the same people who tried to destroy Trump and jail him? I’m sure Brittany enjoys a lot of political benefits from her father being a top ranking RINO senator. I wouldn’t trust the Senate GOP leader if his daughter was tied to PACS funding the nastiest Anti-Trump Democrats in our country. It’s worth noting that Senator Thune has never condemned his daughters’ anti-Trump and pro Democrat political activities. Disqualifying conflict of interest for anyone trying to assume the role of Senate GOP leader. RECEIPTS 👇🏻cc: @CcpSkipTracer @SenRickScott @SenateGOP

🚨 Massive news with worldwide repercussions! The FTC, along with Alaska, Iowa, Nebraska, and Texas, have filed a lawsuit against the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), alleging the organization has provided the means for medical providers to make false and unsubstantiated claims to parents in order to sell pediatric medical transition services. WPATH, an association of clinicians who profit from pediatric medical transition services, recommended medical interventions, including drugs and surgery, for children and adolescents who expressed dissatisfaction with or distress about their sex traits. In their complaint, the FTC and its state partners allege that these recommendations misled parents and children about the medical consensus and medical necessity, as well as the safety and effectiveness, of such services, in violation of the FTC Act. "Today, the FTC filed a lawsuit against WPATH alleging that the organization made false and unsubstantiated claims regarding the necessity, effectiveness and safety of puberty blockers, hormones and sex-change surgeries," said Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson. "Children, but especially their parents, must have complete and truthful information when making decisions to purchase medical services. For decades, the FTC has taken action against entities that make deceptive and unsubstantiated health-related claims. The complaint filed today reflects that same long-standing mandate: when an entity makes a claim about a medical treatment, the claim must be truthful, evidence-based and not misleading." In 2022, WPATH omitted all mention of age limitations for breast amputation or penis removal from the "Standards of Care" document providing the organization's official recommendations for treating sex-trait-related dissatisfaction or distress in children. As alleged in the complaint, WPATH did not base this decision on medical evidence. As described in the complaint, in several instances, parents seeking help for their children were asked by clinicians whether they "would rather have a live daughter or a dead son," based on WPATH representations that pediatric medical transition services are "lifesaving." As the complaint argues, there is no competent and reliable scientific evidence to suggest these interventions reduce the risk of suicide. WPATH claims its recommendations represent "consensus-based expert opinion." This leads WPATH members and other clinicians to repeat to consumers false, misleading or unsubstantiated statements about safety and efficacy found in WPATH guidelines, according to the complaint. According to the complaint, despite the absence of competent and reliable scientific evidence, WPATH's guidelines label nearly every pediatric transition service as "medically necessary" to maximize the likelihood that insurers will pay for the pediatric transition procedures.












