Rusticus1776

11.5K posts

Rusticus1776

Rusticus1776

@Rusticus17761

Trying to bend the arc of the moral universe toward justice, even if just a little.

Sumali Ocak 2021
341 Sinusundan39 Mga Tagasunod
Rusticus1776 nag-retweet
Josh Marshall
Josh Marshall@joshtpm·
Since everyone’s talking abt the feral racist nutbar the NC gop just nominated for Governor, this is probably the definitive piece from one year ago. The social media deep dive. Check out it and share. talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/mark… via @TPM
English
30
432
678
68.1K
Rusticus1776 nag-retweet
Josh Marshall
Josh Marshall@joshtpm·
the GOP is in the midst of multiple rights revolutions on behalf of corporations, embryos and probably other non-people things
English
8
42
178
16.3K
Rusticus1776
Rusticus1776@Rusticus17761·
@meiselasb Incorrect. The chief Justice cited the Bible, but he was speaking for himself, not the court. The court’s opinion does not cite the Bible.
English
0
0
0
6
Ben Meiselas
Ben Meiselas@meiselasb·
The Alabama Supreme Court DID NOT rule that IVF is banned. It DID rule that based on the US Supreme Court decision in Dobbs (overturning Roe) and their citations to Bible verses that a frozen embryo has the same rights as a child and thus destroying a frozen embryo is the same as killing a child. This had the effect of shutting down IVF clinics since they could be regularly sued for wrongful death or even charged with murder. So the press needs to stop asking Republicans THE WRONG QUESTION if they support IVF. That is not remotely the right question and that wasn’t the issue in Alabama. The question is: Do you believe a frozen embryo has the same rights as a child and do you believe the destruction of a frozen embryo is murder. If you determine a frozen embryo is the same as a child you effectively stop IVF treatment from taking place. That’s the issue.
English
421
2.4K
10.6K
1.2M
Rich Newton
Rich Newton@Rich_Newton_·
@jonathanstea @HislopMD The immunity from the COVID -19 vaccine lasts 4 to 6 weeks but the possibility of serious side effects last a lot longer than that.
English
19
0
81
3.8K
Dr. Jonathan N. Stea
Dr. Jonathan N. Stea@jonathanstea·
Doctors are AMAZED at these 10 ways to BOOST your immune system: The Tetanus vaccine The Measles vaccine The Polio vaccine The Mumps vaccine The HPV vaccine The Pneumonia vaccine The Hepatitis B vaccine The Rubella vaccine The Diphtheria vaccine The Covid-19 vaccine - @HislopMD
English
773
2.8K
20.6K
768.5K
Josh Marshall
Josh Marshall@joshtpm·
I read this piece last night. If it accurately portrays the attitiudes of the WH press corps the WH definitely has a problem. But I cld not get past this repeated claim that reporters have avoided the topic because they thought it impolite or indelicate. There's some ...
Dylan Byers@DylanByers

NEW @PuckNews: The Age of Biden: Many in WH press corps have spent the last couple years noticeably avoiding the topic of the president’s agility and acuity because it felt indelicate or irrelevant. Now, the Hur report has stirred some soul-searching. puck.news/the-age-of-bid…

English
28
40
398
101.6K
Rusticus1776 nag-retweet
Ron Filipkowski
Ron Filipkowski@RonFilipkowski·
Trump takes credit for Taylor Swift’s success. There has never been a more petty, insecure, small man in the history of American politics. Everywhere he looks he sees himself as a victim.
Ron Filipkowski tweet media
English
1.5K
3.6K
21.9K
1.1M
Rusticus1776
Rusticus1776@Rusticus17761·
What. The. Hell. Trump says he would encourage Russia to attack NATO allies: “I said I would not protect our NATO allies. In fact, I would encourage Russia to do whatever the hell they want.”
English
0
0
0
18
Laurence Tribe 🇺🇦 ⚖️
On Jan 17 Trump told a New Hampshire audience: “We’re…going to place strong protections to stop banks and regulators from trying to debank you from your—you know, your political beliefs, what they do. They want to debank you, and we’re going to debank—think of this. They want to take away your rights. They want to take away your country. The things they’re doing. All electric cars.”
English
686
1.8K
6.7K
662.1K
Rusticus1776 nag-retweet
Dr. Jonathan N. Stea
Dr. Jonathan N. Stea@jonathanstea·
Welcome to Advanced Trolling: Sealioning Death by a million bad-faith questions. The objective of this brief course is to teach you advanced rhetorical skills in Troll-ology. We will specifically be focused on how to master the art of sealioning, which is a relatively newly minted term used to describe a specific kind of social media trolling. The term sealioning was derived from a Wondermark comic by David Malki. In essence, it can be described as death by a million bad-faith questions. It is not for the faint of heart. The goal of sealioning is to push an ideological agenda by means of leaving the targeted opponent tired, breathless, and speechless — much like a victim of Muhammad Ali’s rope-a-dope boxing tactic, but without the knockout. Sealioning is an insidious Trojan horse. It cloaks misinformation and propaganda in many disguises: politeness, sincerity, curiosity, compassion, and even martyrdom. It is the sophisticated adult-version of the fraternity-esque “debate me bro” plea. At its core, however, those who engage in sealioning still have their ears plugged and their eyes shut, and they’re annoying as hell. Now that we’ve identified and attached a name to the sealioning phenomenon, you will notice how easy it is to spot it in the wild. It shows up in political discourse. It’s a mainstay tactic of those who harass scientists and health professionals (think: anti-vaccine movement). It is truly fascinating to witness — unless it’s happening to you, in which case it’s an almost unbearable experience. You might ask, what exactly would we see if we used a hypothetical magnifying glass to zoom into the world of sealioning to observe its dynamics in its natural social media habitat? Well, we would see that sealioning can be distilled and extracted into several different strategies. They are not mutually exclusive. You can be speared by one or more of the following darts. Sealioning strategies. The flipper: Distort, flip, and then reflect back your target’s words. This kind of misrepresentation will leave your target jaw-dropped. For example, if your target says something like, “The scientific method is the best way to find out whether medicines work.” Implement the flipper. Announce, “The scientific method is the best AND THE WORST way to find out whether medicines work BECAUSE SCIENCE IS FUNDAMENTALLY CORRUPT.” Finding the middle ground: Those who engage in sealioning delight to lay claim to the idea that they’re seeking to find a middle ground in reasonable debate, which in reality, secretly serves to legitimize a component of their agenda. Ask questions and talk at experts in the name of finding a false middle ground. The American clinical psychologist, Paul Meehl, nailed this sentiment when he quoted the statistician, MG Kendall: “A friend of mine once remarked that if some people asserted the earth rotated from East-West and others from West-East, there would always be a few well-meaning people to suggest that the truth probably lay between the extremes or did not rotate at all.” Whataboutism/Whataboutery: Besides being a variant of the tu quoque logical fallacy, it also induces hair-pulling. It is a red herring. It is a rhetorical defense that responds by reversing a claim, charging hypocrisy, or raising a different issue. The response is irrelevant to the truth of the claim. For example, Person A: Pseudoscientific therapies can be harmful. Person B: What about Big Pharma?! The armchair critic’s pipe: The metaphorical armchair critic is the enemy of reason and the champion of postmodern philosophy because they eschew hard-won expertise for their own personal anecdotes that are regarded as equally valid. If Donald’s second-cousins’s former roommate says so, then it must be true. Overwhelm your target with a shotgun of personal anecdotes in the form of a series of questions to render them paralyzed with frustration. Dr. Google’s jugular punch: Expertise be damned. Everyone can become an expert in three simple clicks. Question your target by linking to a non-peer-reviewed source such as a blog or an extremist website that hosts a variety of cherry-picked, low quality research studies that you don’t understand. The spirit of this weapon is perhaps best captured by physician and author Atul Gawande: “Few dismiss the authority of science. They dismiss the authority of the scientific community. People don’t argue back by claiming divine authority anymore. They argue back by claiming to have the truer scientific authority.” Blind Socratic questioning: Named after the philosopher, Socratic questioning is a focused, incisive, good-faith questioning method that was used by Socrates to help clarify thoughts, critically appraising them, and discover truth. But you’re not Socrates. Blind Socratic questioning involves first equipping yourself with an entitled aura and then proceeding to pointlessly nit-pick every nook and cranny of your target’s comments until neither you nor they understand what the hell is being discussed. A maddening process. Trope abuse (also known as ideological puppetry): Occurs when a person’s thoughts and behaviors are heavily guided by an ideology that transcends their own critical faculties. In other words, when a person’s strings are being pulled — like a puppet — by ideas beyond their awareness. All you have to do is imbue your questioning with often-repeated mottos, phrases, and rebuttals that are hallmarks of the agenda you wish to advance. For example, “So many people can’t all be wrong!”, “Science doesn’t have all of the answers!”, and “Galileo was persecuted too!” Game of tag: Finally, the power of sealioning can be strengthened by recruiting slippery sealioning friends to participate in the ambush. Death by a million questions can quickly amplify to a billion questions. It’s like being poked and prodded by countless and simultaneous wet dog noses — you may think that sounds desirable but trust me, it isn’t. I am sometimes asked: how is genuine good-faith questioning differentiated from disingenuous bad-faith sealioning? Admittedly, it’s a grey zone. But a helpful compass to direct your inquiry would be to look for social media context. Does the person who is engaging in suspected sealioning repeatedly post about particular themes, such as climate change or abortion? If so, then it might be the case that they are well-practiced at spreading their ideas veiled in this killing-with-kindness approach. You too, can earn your place on the wrong side of the debate. Ultimately, sealioning is a literary art. And an ugly one at that. Now, go forth, master these skills, and make the world a little worse off than where you found it. medium.com/digital-diplom…
Dr. Jonathan N. Stea tweet media
English
67
170
445
56.3K
Rusticus1776 nag-retweet
The Intellectualist
The Intellectualist@highbrow_nobrow·
Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) saying that he wants to end Social Security— “to pull it up by the roots and get rid of it.” h/t @NoLieWithBTC.
English
83
822
974
45.5K
Rusticus1776 nag-retweet
Jeff Tiedrich
Jeff Tiedrich@itsJeffTiedrich·
listen up, stupids: just this week, Donald Trump refused to testify. Eric Trump also refused to testify. Rudy Giuliani also refused to testify. if you think that Hunter Biden showing up and offering to testify somehow makes -him- the one who's hiding something, you're just being an obstinate tribal asshole and I can't help you
English
643
4.4K
17.7K
674.6K
Rusticus1776 nag-retweet
Hemant Mehta
Hemant Mehta@hemantmehta·
Christian Nationalist Joshua Feuerstein, who’s running for Texas State House, wants women to know he’ll make their lives worse. Hell of a campaign promise.
Hemant Mehta tweet media
English
30
135
504
28.2K
Rusticus1776 nag-retweet
Victor Shi
Victor Shi@Victorshi2020·
BREAKING: The Supreme Court just DECLINED to block the Illinois ban on assault weapons and large capacity magazines, meaning that the law stays in place. Some rare great news out of the Supreme Court. Now let’s get every Democratic state to pass the same law as Illinois.
English
500
3.1K
14.5K
257.4K
Rusticus1776 nag-retweet
John Aravosis 🇺🇸🇬🇷🏳️‍🌈
NBC published a fake story claiming White House interns signed a letter criticizing Biden over Gaza. The letter wasn’t just “anonymous,” no one even signed it. Random anonymous people filled a box on a Google form claiming which White House office they allegedly worked in. 1/
English
26
705
1.9K
166.8K
Rusticus1776 nag-retweet
Dr. Jonathan N. Stea
Dr. Jonathan N. Stea@jonathanstea·
There's a sucker born every minute. But it can be much more dangerous than that. And when governments and societies lose the capacity for critical thinking, the results can be catastrophic—however sympathetic we may be to those who have bought the baloney. - Carl Sagan
Raul@RonnieRampant

@jonathanstea I'd like to offer myself up for a trial with any of you clot shot pushing doctors. Take me, an unvaxxed healthy 40 year old, and another healthy vaxxed 40 year old. Infect us both with covid, and let's see who does better. If you want 5 other volunteers we can add them too.

English
38
34
187
12.7K