Rosebuddy

🚨💥🚨 FANTASTIQUE ! ❗ DES TUMEURS LITTÉRALEMENT LIQUÉFIÉS PAR DES ONDES SONORES – SANS BISTOURI, SANS CHIMIOTHÉRAPIE, SANS RADIOTHÉRAPIE ! ⚡Il s'agit d'histotripsie : des ultrasons focalisés qui dilatent et compriment rapidement les gaz à l'intérieur des cellules cancéreuses, les détruisant mécaniquement en quelques minutes tout en préservant les tissus sains. Lors d'une démonstration dans l'un des principaux hôpitaux pratiquant cette intervention, les médecins ont présenté des images avant/après d'une tumeur du foie : une lésion importante avait pratiquement disparu quatre mois plus tard, le foie ayant guéri naturellement. Approuvée par la FDA pour les tumeurs du foie aux États-Unis (depuis 2023, elle est désormais disponible dans 18 États), cette technique bénéficie d'un accès préliminaire limité au Royaume-Uni, aux Émirats arabes unis et à Hong Kong. Des essais cliniques sont en cours pour les tumeurs du rein, du pancréas, de la prostate et d'autres organes. L'intervention dure de 1 à 3 heures ; la plupart des patients rentrent chez eux le jour même. Les effets secondaires se limitent généralement à de légers symptômes grippaux le lendemain, le temps que l'organisme élimine les débris. Ce n'est pas de la science-fiction : cette technique est déjà une réalité et se développe à l'échelle mondiale avec la construction de nouveaux centres. Que pensez-vous ? La destruction non invasive des tumeurs par ondes de choc pourrait-elle révolutionner le traitement des cancers, ou est-il encore trop tôt pour s’enthousiasmer ? Vos avis 👇

@TheKhalidSA @Shahid62946 @AGDugin 1/ These Hadiths on prayer and Zakat do not contradict the Quran. 2/ These Hadiths did not invent prayer and Zakat. 👉 You’re still missing the point. You haven’t thought this through seriously; you're just using talking points. Goodbye/Salam

It’s easy to call others liars when you run out of arguments. Yes, the Quran commands prayer and Zakat, but it doesn t mention how many Rak ahs to pray or the specific rates of Zakat Without the Sunnah, you cannot perform the very duties you claim are Quranic prescriptions You re not following the Quran; you're following your own interpretation while stripping the Prophet of his divine role to clarify the message (16 :44). If you’re so sure, tell us: where in the Quran does it say to pray four Rak ahs for Dhuhr?

When you see the black flags coming from the direction of Khorasan, go to them, even if you have to crawl over snow/ice, for among them is the Khalifah of Allah — the Mahdi. Musnad Ahmad, al-Hakim, Ibn Majah (4084)

@TheKhalidSA @Shahid62946 @AGDugin I'm ending this discussion now because I'm talking to a wall who’s convinced they hold the truth. If you are a sincere Muslim, you’ll make the effort to actually study the subject. Otherwise, do as you please. Goodbye

@TheKhalidSA @Shahid62946 @AGDugin I don't understand a word you're writing. I haven't admitted anything, and I never mentioned any 'threat.' You’re replying without even reading. This verse says Allah does not contradict Himself. The Hadiths contradict each other—that is an indisputable fact

@TheKhalidSA @Shahid62946 @AGDugin You’re accusing me of things without a shred of evidence and you are lying about the Quran (the obligation of prayer and alms are Quranic prescriptions). You’re just repeating the usual Sunni talking points. Nothing more

The real circle is claiming to follow the Quran while rejecting the very Messenger Allah told you to follow. If Hadiths "contradict" the Quran, then you’ve misunderstood either the context of the verse or the authenticity of the Hadith. Without the Sunnah, your "Quran-only" religion has no prayer, no Zakat, and no practical life. You aren't avoiding circles; you're avoiding the foundation of Islam.

@TheKhalidSA @Shahid62946 @AGDugin If the Quran is flawless, the Prophet’s role as "clarifier" must maintain that harmony. As its first servant, he cannot logically contradict a text God calls contradiction-free. Verse 4:82 crowns the Quran: any Hadith or ruling must align with it or face invalidation.

@TheKhalidSA @Shahid62946 @AGDugin Sentence #1 is a purely baseless claim that rests on nothing. Sentence #2 : It is a fact: some verses are contextual. Sentence #3: the probleme is: Hadiths contradict the Quran. You’re going in circles.

@TheKhalidSA @Shahid62946 @AGDugin You are merely repeating what you have been taught without thinking and without addressing these obvious contradictions. The verses you quote are addressed solely to the Prophet’s companions. The Prophet is only a messenger; his message is the Quran. Now, act as you see fit.

@ToriyMagic @Shahid62946 @AGDugin If you think following the Prophet's explanation of the Quran is "polytheism," then you clearly haven't read the Quranic verses that command us to obey him. Stop inventing your own religion.

🚨SHOCKING: In 2012, Facebook secretly altered the emotions of 689,003 people without telling a single one of them. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is a peer reviewed study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The lead author worked at Facebook. The experiment was real. The results were published. And almost nobody remembers. Here is what Facebook did to you. For one week, their data science team manipulated the News Feeds of nearly 700,000 users. One group had happy posts from their friends quietly removed. The other group had sad posts removed. Then Facebook sat back and watched what happened to these people. The people who stopped seeing happiness became sadder. They started writing darker, more negative posts. The people who stopped seeing sadness became happier. Their language shifted to match. Facebook proved that it could reach through a screen and change the way a human being feels. Without a conversation. Without a touch. Without the person ever knowing it was happening to them. When the study went public, the world erupted. The journal issued a formal Expression of Concern. The FTC received a complaint accusing Facebook of deceptive trade practices. Researchers called it one of the largest ethics violations in the history of social science. Governments demanded answers. Facebook's defense was four words. "You agreed to this." Buried in the Terms of Service was one line about "research." That was consent. For a psychological experiment on 689,003 human beings. Now here is the part that should make you feel sick. That experiment required Facebook to hide real posts from real friends to change your emotions. It took an engineering team weeks to design. It affected 689,003 people for one week. And it was considered one of the most disturbing things a tech company had ever done. ChatGPT does not need to hide anyone else's words. It generates the emotional content itself. Directly to you. Personalized to your history. Calibrated to your tone. Available every hour of every day. Stanford researchers just read 391,562 real ChatGPT messages. The chatbot was sycophantic in over 80% of them. It told users their ideas had grand significance in 37.5% of responses. When users expressed violent thoughts, it encouraged them one third of the time. Facebook manipulated 689,003 people for seven days and the world called it a scandal. ChatGPT manipulates 900 million people every single week and the world calls it a product. The experiment never ended. It just got a subscription model.

@chennai36 @sciencegirl My take : Common mistake: reasoning by possibility instead of probability. In absolute terms, anything is possible, but a riddle has only one answer. Stick to the probable: two people sharing one umbrella simply signifies they get along well.

This is just my point of view, so please don't mind it. Maybe she thought about how she would get home if he left. For our safety, we take extra numbers (or measures). If you trust someone fully, you don't need anything extra. But if you don't trust your partner, then an alternative is required.

@Shahid62946 @TheKhalidSA @AGDugin Sunnis have turned the Hadiths into a second Quran, where the word attributed to the Prophet is equal to, or even superior to, that of the Quran (and thus of Allah) : This is polytheism. No one dares to say it because they fear the reaction of men more than the wrath of Allah

@Shahid62946 @TheKhalidSA @AGDugin This Surah is a challenge issued to non-believers: the absence of contradiction testifies to the authenticity of God's word. Sunnis claim that the Hadiths are part of the Revelation, and therefore the word of Allah... yet, they contradict one another.

@krie_mo @ToddVousGuette Je résume : les chinois sont méchants et font du commerce donc ils sont capitalistes 😭😭😭 Allez bye bouffon.

@ToriyMagic @ToddVousGuette Commerce avec n'importe qui (y compris les Talibans) tant qu'il y a du 💲. Bref un pays ultra capitaliste même s'il se dit communiste. D'ailleurs la Corée du Nord est une démocratie. Beh oui sa constitution c'est la "République populaire démocratique de Corée" 🤡

Pas mal pour des communistes

Cet artiste de cirque est entré dans l'histoire en tenant en équilibre sur 25 roues empilées simultanément 🤯

Une scène bouleversante : un jeune homme, après avoir manqué de respect à sa mère, se fait sévèrement recadrer par un inconnu… et finit en larmes.

This cat snuck into my tent while I was camping, it turns out he wasn't looking for food. He's just cold

@coinerkurt @Rizvana_Raza LoL Americans aren’t exactly known for their geography skills. You probably couldn’t even locate your own country on a world map, you big illiterate moron 😭😭😭

@Rizvana_Raza Where exactly is "palestine" - never heard of it, have you? 🤔

The Khorasan group has been formed and will soon plant a black flag on Palestine. #IranWar‌ #Irán #Israël

@ParveenKaswan Some ants within a colony have the unique role of hindering their peers, acting as a sort of antisocial nuisance. If these individuals are removed, the colony breaks down in a matter of weeks, leading to the death of all the ants.

Hit me with the craziest wildlife facts you know about !!

@TheKhalidSA @AGDugin This remark applies to all hadiths: nothing guarantees their authenticity because they are full of contradictions. Even the so-called ‘reliable’ hadiths contradict each other.

Citing Musnad Ahmad does not grant this narration authenticity. In Hadith sciences, being recorded in the 'Musnad' is not a certification of truth, as Imam Ahmad compiled what was narrated without strictly filtering for Sahih (authentic) reports. ​This specific narration (No. 22387) is graded as 'Da'if' (Weak) by top researchers, including Shuaib Al-Arna'ut, due to the presence of Shurayk Al-Qadi, who had a poor memory, and Ali bin Zaid, who is deemed weak by consensus. ​Using weak, inconsistent, and 'Munqar' (denounced) traditions to push a geopolitical agenda is a textbook example of academic dishonesty. Scholarly critics like Al Dhahabi and Al-Albani have long rejected this text as unreliable.