TraderZero

Let me help it make sense to you. I almost died in a head-on collision with an intoxicated driver at combined 160mph. My kid set up a GoFundMe while I was in the hospital. Take a wild-ass guess on the total medical billing to date for: • A three-month hospital stay • Two spinal surgeries to repair one completely burst vertebra and 4 fractured vertebrae — L1 was driven 6mm into my spinal cord with 50% height loss, nearly paralyzing me • L4 & L5 ruptured disks • Three leg and foot surgeries to bolt together my tib/fib — both broken in half, foreshortened, then non-union after a year • A severely shattered, displaced intra-articular fractured calcaneus (heel), comminuted navicular bone, torn Achilles • Non-union after 15 months that required a permanently disabling triple arthrodesis salvage surgery • That surgery got superbug infected at 8 weeks (Pseudomonas about a month ago) • Latest surgery on 3/12 that still isn’t healing, I just had to drop $6,600 cash for an ultrasonic bone healing system that arrived today Now pay for all of it with zero health insurance, $3k/month alimony, no income, and your only capital is in your Fidelity account and credit cards while trying to save your leg from amputation. Spoiler - Realistic on the total billed charges? Well over $2 million, and that’s conservative for this level of trauma in the US when you’re uninsured. Hospitals don’t give discounts on the chargemaster rates until you’re already broke. So yeah… when I call out helium bullshit and market-manipulation fantasies, it is from a different perspective. Trading is not a game to me and foolish people bet their life savings on a fucking OTC stub that was exchanged for shares in a scam O&G shell. Don't be crying like a bitch like somehow that is not your own fault. Some of us have been fighting for actual financial survival after real life tried to end us. IDGAF about the doxxing and personal attacks, it makes y'all feel important and just means what I am saying resonates. Don't worry about me, I am coming back to X strong and I’ll keep dropping facts.

@_TraderZero_ @505_call It sucks that you had that accident no doubt about it, but for somebody always talking shit and bragging about how much money he makes and ask for handouts it doesn't make sense🤦‍♂️

One day you wake up and finally realize: nobody makes money trading stocks short “in the dark.” The truth is the DTCC holds all the paper. Brokers owe them the shares AND the money. (dtcc.com/asset-services…) Every night they reconcile trades via the NSCC’s Continuous Net Settlement (CNS) syst em. Positions get netted, funds confirmed settled — and your broker dodges a forced buy-in. (dtcc.com/clearing-and-s…) The last thing a short seller wants? Mountains of Fails-to-Deliver (FTDs). When those pile up, buy-side brokers get forced to buy the stock on the lit market to close them out. (sec.gov/investor/pubs/…) Forced buy-ins — especially the ones retail bag holders scream about 24/7 — can trigger a vicious short squeeze when volume spikes, the float is thin, or trading is light. Issuers love pretending they’re “in the dark” too… but they aren’t. They partner with transfer agents and pay the DTCC for real liquidity intel. Most get the official End-of-Day Security Position Report (SPR) by broker showing aggregate long and short positions. IR rep usually sees it around midnight. (dtcc.com/asset-services…) The market has eyes everywhere. The plumbing never sleeps. Most traders keep gambling after the wreck, chasing the back side of the move or holding bags because they never learned how this shit actually works. The smart ones finally accept reality, study the mechanics, and start grinding to take their edge back. This is just the beginning. More on how the system really operates coming soon. Know the plumbing. ✌️TZ

"And now they won’t provide the necessary total outstanding share count for a company to accurately price its share in a spinoff S-1 filing which would make the series A shareholders whole. " $MMTLP exactly what you need, a spokesperson that nobody will take seriously. Give her a cheat sheet or some shit. The S-1 doesn't benefit shareholders at all. It says specifically how proceeds are allocated in plain English. It also confirms Next Bridge common share count is 100% accurate. New clowns, same circus. Smh.

$29,035 - five surgeries and still facing possible amputation. Anything helps, including your posts about it. I'll never hide from needing help after a life changing event. I am a victim of a drunk driver and am lucky to be alive. Many die. You and the other losers rooting for my death and demise makes me stronger. Keep it up. gofund.me/63c77e66e

@_TraderZero_ What’s the total for GO FUND ME Grifting?

When a big name like $AMZN Amazon dumps like this its a must buy for your long term accounts, swing accounts and trade options with conviction. $2.48 and $3.10 to 200x 13.8 with an easy exit is how you can take a $300 or $500 account to $2500 or $3000 setting yourself up for bigger entries and bigger gains. Patience and discipline is the key. Learn to trade and stop chasing hype. Your a victim of you.

@Tiggersdad2 The majority of those still active were primarily influenced by Brda.

essentially lie about a company's prospects. MMTLP's value, or lack thereof, was readily apparent in MMAT's financials, but somehow, there were many people under the illusion MMTLP / NBH was sitting on billions of barrels of oil. Next Bridge is my stop loss wasn't an accident.

I remember all the $MMTLP baggies arguing with me about the value of the "oil" assets. If there's one thing @SECGov could do to improve the markets it would be to cut down on what I call information arbitrage, whereby insiders and influencers use social media to...1/

$AMZN at $197 was a no brainer buy, took the flyer on the $240c and she didn't dissapoint.

@Mark56371084 Bigger than Madoff!!!!

When you hear someone say "This is bigger than Enron"...🤔 money.usnews.com/investing/arti….

$MMTLP 3 plus years and Next Bridge's finest still haven't learned a thing about market mechanics. "165m dividend shares were allocated to $trch holders how did a market open with ZERO shares to trade" Answer: OTC is not an exchange and the the governing documents did not prohibit transfer or trading of the Series A shares. OTC Markets is not an exchange. It doesnt matter if a company doesn't intend to list the shares or facilitate trading and it doesn't matter if the shares were registered with the SEC or not. They were tagged unsolicited and @johnbrda put no legal language in the Certificate of Designation or Side Letter to prevent a broker-dealer from facilitating secondary market transactions, provided that the transactions complied with applicable securities laws. Brda signed the side letter and designation certificate and had the nads to call them “Non-tradable placeholder dividends" publicly. I am looking forward to the SEC revealing he was the designated Preferred A Series Representative.

@Greenhills303 @spldbrat351964 @fearles59324823 @yoyofakowee @Mastcab1 What about Roth?

#MMTLP #MMTLParmy #MMTLPfraud #MMTLPfiasco @spldbrat351964 @fearles59324823 @yoyofakowee @Mastcab1 The SEC deal with Meta that forced them to pay a $1 million fine and the SEC v. Brda/Palikaras lawsuit is the main load bearing beam that insures that MMTLP shareholders get something down the line if I can convince the US Bankruptcy Court Judge Spraker that his February 5, 2026 orders stating that Next Bridge was "separate" from Meta was in error. I raised it as a standing issue and also to show that Wes Christian told the court he no longer represented NBH but - anticipating what the trustee's attorney would do - he certainly does now in Next Bridge v. Davies. Beyond that, Meta provided money and talent - according to the SEC - to get NBH going in 2020. For S-1 purposes, the SEC filings clearly show that Brda and Palikaras absolutely knew that there was scant oil and gas in Orogrande. Bottom line: I'm arguing that because the entire MMTLP merger/spinoff of TRCH was fabricated and false (don't take my word for it, the SEC says it was with basically zero assets or assets misrepresented in profound, shareholder destroying ways), then MMTLP people either: 1. Have shares of MMAT for recovery because of the fraudulent creation of MMTLP or... 2. Have actionable claims against the Meta estate, Palikaras, and the Board of Directors (as is @fearles59324823 's case now on hold while it all gets sorted out). The wildcard in the mix isn't just Sabby Management LLC or Jane Street or Parabellum Capital. It's possibly through one of the biggest firms out there. Carlisle Group. Here's the filing from last week and a few snapshots: drive.google.com/file/d/1UAf5ex…

@fearles59324823 @Metabilities @Greenhills303 You requested under Texas law, not Nevada law. If you don't compel in Nevada, he can ignore the request

@Metabilities @_TraderZero_ @Greenhills303 x.com/i/status/19590…

$MMTLP $MMAT all the federal lawsuits, hounding Congress, cheering on predatory lawyers, endless spaces spinning bullshit into reality, SEC charges, and not a single shareholder has asserted their rights to get the name of the only person who was making decisions on your behalf. From selling assets to agreeing on the terms of the Corporate Action and exercising their fiduciary duty to protect shareholders, the name of the Preferred Representative (the person who controlled the oil & gas assets, dividends, and spin-off decision) needs to be in the public record. NBH must comply with Books & Records demand letters under Nevada 78.257. The letter below takes 5 minutes + certified mail. Low cost, high impact. If you held MMTLP and truly want transparency, the Perferred A Rep knows where all the bodies are buried. ✌️TZ [Your Full Name] [Your Address] [City, State, ZIP] [Email] [Phone] [Date] Next Bridge Hydrocarbons, Inc. Attn: Corporate Secretary 1001 McKinney Street, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77002 Re: Formal Demand for Inspection of Books and Records Pursuant to NRS § 78.257 Dear Corporate Secretary and Board of Directors: I am a shareholder of record of Next Bridge Hydrocarbons, Inc. (“NBH” or the “Company”), having received NBH shares in the December 2022 spin-off of the Series A Preferred Stock (formerly traded as $MMTLP). Pursuant to Nevada Revised Statutes § 78.257, I hereby demand the right to inspect and make copies (at my expense) of the following books and records during normal business hours: 1. The full name, residential or business address, contact information, date of appointment, and any date of resignation or replacement of the individual or entity who served as the "Preferred Representative" (also referred to as the Series A Preferred Representative) under the Side Letter dated on or about May 2021. 2. The complete, unredacted Side Letter agreement, including all exhibits, amendments, and related documents. 3. All communications, correspondence, emails, memoranda, notes, or minutes between the Preferred Representative and any current or former officer, director, employee, or agent of Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc., Meta Materials Inc., or Next Bridge Hydrocarbons, Inc. (including Gregpry McCabe) from December 14, 2020 to the present date. 4. All documents reflecting the selection, appointment, compensation, authority, and performance of the Preferred Representative. 5. All board resolutions, consents, or minutes approving the appointment of the Preferred Representative or ratifying any actions taken by the Preferred Representative. 6. All documents related to the calculation and distribution (or non-distribution) of Net Proceeds, Asset Sale Dividends, Holdback Amounts, and the Spin-Off Dividend in December 2022. This demand is made for the proper purpose of investigating potential breaches of fiduciary duty, self-dealing, conflicts of interest, and mismanagement in connection with the Series A Preferred Stock and the spin-off to NBH. Please confirm receipt of this demand in writing within five (5) business days and advise of a date, time, and location for inspection within ten (10) business days of receipt. Inspection may be conducted electronically if more convenient. I reserve all rights and remedies available under Nevada law, including the right to petition the court for enforcement and recovery of attorneys’ fees and costs if this demand is not promptly honored. Sincerely, [Your Full Name] [Signature]

No, why the fuck would they? The trading of $MMTLP was a gift to retail. The only people crying about the SEC and FINRA are non-traders who impulse bought it on hype and FOMO. Once short covering ended, retail volume at $12 was weak and the trade flipped. Every indicator, candle, chart pattern screamed mass exodus from the peak to the end of trading on the 8th. It couldn't trade after that because of T+2.

@_TraderZero_ You reposted but never answered the question A simple yes or no?

$MMTLP this was due to clearing. DTC eligibility came in behind initial broker to broker clearing on a new OTC unsolicited ticker. Need more than three trading days to set it up. Short exempt to provide liquidity is standard procedure. It settles itself out a few weeks later

@palikaras $MMTLP There was no legitimate "price discovery" left on an empty stub after Dec 8. Why the fuck would lenders want MMTLP shares post-8th? Longs didn’t want it — they were getting NBH exactly as advertised. Shorts didn’t need to buy it. Lenders needed NBH shares returned. FINRA halted trading on an A-series preferred that literally nobody wanted or needed to buy anymore, while a fuck-ton of retail was convinced they’d cash out at $300+. Whose fault is the delusion vs. reality mismatch? Not FINRA’s job to babysit basic corporate action mechanics or protect people from ignoring the record date / T+2 cutoff. #MMTLP

$MMTLP 165M shares were given away for free representing assets that had no value and no liquidity. It starts trading unsolicited at .70, (115.5Mcap) it triples in price (189.7Mcap) and stays there for a year with no real range. 8 million shares are sold short with no downside movement at all and then retail fucking annihilates them over a 6 week parabolic run to $12. You are saying market makers fucked retail by handing them $1.98 billion in equity from $0? Hilarious. This was one of the cleanest sustained squeeze trades you'll ever see. Anyone short into the upside run got smoked. If thats what you call market makers fucking retail will somebody tell them to do it again please? By the way, that knife into the 8th is a textbook selloff, volume and price never lie, smart money was exiting in droves before the 8th made it an empty stub. If you bought after the peak, ask yourself why. You certainly weren't investing.

**...no exit strategy

Only a 7% gain…” With disciplined execution: 5 trades like that = +35% week Good stops mean losses stay small and controlled Respect the tape, VPA drives action, always have an exit strategy. Discipline > shit talk.