Frank Friedmann #StopWar #SaveYourRights

Yet another U-turn by Keir Starmer & Labour, this time on the right to roam, "after opposition from some landowners’ groups". What is the point of Labour? #VoteGreen #RightToRoam theguardian.com/environment/20…

Israel has killed multiple times more people since October 7 than were killed on October 7, has caused many times more destruction since October 7 than was caused on October 7, and has inflicted many times more pain and suffering since October 7 than was inflicted on October 7. Even if you completely ignore the power dynamics and abuses which led to the Hamas attack and just look impartially at the raw data, it’s an easily quantifiable fact that what Israel has done since October 7 is worse than what Hamas did on October 7. While there is a huge taboo against saying this publicly, it’s not seriously debatable. But that isn’t the foremost objective fact separating the death and destruction on October 7 from all the death and destruction that’s happened since. The foremost objective fact separating the death and destruction on October 7 from the death and destruction that’s happened since is that October 7 already happened, while the Gaza massacre is still ongoing and can be stopped. Everything that happened on October 7 is in the past. It’s done. No matter how many bombs the IDF drops, no matter how many civilians in Gaza are killed, no matter how many buildings are smashed to rocks and powder, no matter how much propaganda the western media churn out, it won’t bring one single Israeli who died on October 7 back to life. Nothing about October 7 can be changed. It’s in the past. We have no access to it. But what can be changed is the decision to keep killing civilians by the thousands with a relentless barrage of military explosives and strangling them to death with siege warfare for something they did not do. At any time Israel could stop turning entire city blocks into rubble and adding to the thousands of children who’ve been killed, but they don’t. It’s still happening. Every hour this goes on is another decision made by the Israeli government to keep it going, and every hour it keeps going is more death and human misery in Gaza. And at a certain point there’s a very important question that will need to be answered, and that question is this: how much is enough? How much killing is enough killing? How many civilians need to die before we can draw a line under this one? How high does the pile of mutilated and dismembered children need to be before it’s enough? Give me a specific height please, in meters or in yards. It’s an answer we’re going to come to one way or another. At some point we’re going to reach the end of the killing, either because some sliver of conscience awakened in the powers perpetrating and facilitating it, or because it became politically inconvenient to continue, or because some meaningless and arbitrary goal was declared to have been met, or because the killers felt satiated by the amount of killing they’d done, or because there was no one left to kill. So we may as well begin chewing on that question right now so we can get settle on a number as soon as possible. How much is enough? It’s a question that demands an answer. And the answer we come to collectively will say a lot about our species, and about where it is headed.

Europe’s media and politicians are on a quest to make racism mainstream again diem25.org/europes-media-…

How many more Palestinians must die before the Prime Minister condemns Israel's war crimes and calls for a ceasefire?

The thing about Israel apologists who say Israel needs to go scorched earth on Gaza or else there'll be another Hamas attack is that, *in the sense that they mean it*, they're correct. Because they have already ruled out the option of rolling back the many Israeli abuses which led to the rise of Hamas and the attack on October 7, it is a safe bet that if they agreed to a ceasefire right now and returned to the abusive status quo which provoked the attack it would only be a matter of time before Gazans launched another one. So, *from within that framework*, the only other option is to kill and kill and kill and destroy and destroy and destroy until Gaza can pose no further threat. The problem, of course, is that their framework is bullshit. The obvious other option is to move toward peace and reconciliation and righting all the wrongs which gave rise to the attack on October 7, which would mean a one-state or two-state solution that Palestinians are happy with instead of the status quo of apartheid and tyranny and ghettos and a giant concentration camp of profound human suffering. That would allow the possibility of a ceasefire without the need for continued Palestinian resistance. But Israel is unwilling to do this because it would mean ceding a bunch of land and/or ending Israel's existence as a Jewish ethnostate, so that option is framed as unthinkable nonsense instead of the glaringly obvious fix for this problem that it plainly is. Murdering children by the thousands and carpet bombing Gaza is seen as preferable to the measures that would be necessary to achieve a lasting peace.

UPDATE: X has got back to me confirming that they’re censoring my posts because apparently deviating from the establishment narrative on Israel/Palestine/Gaza “creates a negative impact”. So much for all the free speech advocacy @elonmusk. Congrats, you fooled us all. Pathetic.

The Government must answer one question - what will it take to condemn the slaughter of Palestinians in #Gaza? Watch my question to the Foreign Secretary this morning 👇🏾

The @UN Charter – which entered into force 78 years ago today – is rooted in a spirit of determination to heal divisions, repair relations & build peace. We are a divided world. We can and must be united nations. #UNDay

Btw I can see your linked doc at unherd.com/2023/10/why-pe…. Is it the same thing?

Why is this thread unavailable to me (as you suspected, @battleforeurope )?

@rec777777 @paullewismoney @UKLabour Then increase public ones - provide councils with the funds to do it!

@friedmann_f @paullewismoney @UKLabour There are fewer private rentals

So many Londoners work until Wednesday lunchtime to give money to their landlord and the rest of the week for themselves bit.ly/406nyH0

@rec777777 @paullewismoney @UKLabour Takes 2 to tango - Landlords sell up, but someone buys. Bigger property companies expand their portfolios.

@paullewismoney Supply and demand. Nowhere near enough housing, huge influx of migrants Tax and Net Zero is seeing landlords sell up. Fewer homes on the market, higher rents. EPC rules under @UKLabour will force me to evict more and increase rents

🧵 19 years ago, US & UK forces launched an assault on Falujah, believing this would be a decisive battle that would decapitate the Iraqi insurgency. What happened next ought to give Israel pause for thought before it launches its ground invasion of #Gaza.

@Fsalt @GrodeckW @GretaThunberg It isn't.

@GrodeckW @GretaThunberg I had no idea that octopus was/is antisemitic and I'm almost 60 years young, not 20 something

For those currently attacking @GretaThunberg over a cuddly toy, an exhaustive thread to add perspective. That *any* depiction of an octopus (or squid) is somehow an expression of antisemitism is utterly ahistorical and has - ironically - become a trope. 1/x

@GrodeckW @GretaThunberg I hope @GretaThunberg will see the diversity of depictions of the octopus by cartoonists curated here by @GrodeckW, and realise the malice of those who bullied her into taking down her message of solidarity.

@GeorgeMonbiot Isn't the Gaza prison zone a crime against civilians? Or the West Bank settlements?

Just as Hamas solved nothing with its atrocities against Israelis, the Israeli government solves nothing with its horrific mass punishment of Palestinians. There is never a justification for crimes against civilians.

@caitoz And still, Julian Assange is imprisoned….