Michael Ducker

1.8K posts

Michael Ducker banner
Michael Ducker

Michael Ducker

@miradu

Host of https://t.co/Nm7X0eik6Y. Cofounder, https://t.co/5TAK8p4itf. Cofounder Pinch (acq. @Chime). VP Product and Builder. @OlinCollege Alum

San Francisco Sumali Mart 2007
2.1K Sinusundan6.2K Mga Tagasunod
Michael Ducker
Michael Ducker@miradu·
Missed joining this morning.? We meet again next Thursday, 8 to 930.
English
0
0
0
21
Michael Ducker
Michael Ducker@miradu·
We had 120 RSVPs for AgentBuildersBreakfast.com this morning! An absolutely huge crowd showed up. It was so much fun. Machine Payments Protocol was the topic of the day.
Michael Ducker tweet media
English
2
0
3
67
Michael Ducker
Michael Ducker@miradu·
what a time to be alive in tech - entirely new Trillion dollar ecosystems are being created and iterated in public every single week. (hello @x402 @tempo @stripe MPP!)
English
0
0
0
113
Michael Ducker
Michael Ducker@miradu·
i'm seeing this pattern more and more -> prompt to install
Michael Ducker tweet media
English
1
0
4
265
Turner Novak 🍌🧢
Turner Novak 🍌🧢@TurnerNovak·
BREAKING: a16z is now including 50g of PROTEIN in each term sheet
English
42
16
527
37.3K
Michael Ducker
Michael Ducker@miradu·
no amount of AI can solve the challenge that distilling your product marketing and story into 10 hero words is extremely tough and constantly worth iterating/testing
English
1
0
4
134
Michael Ducker
Michael Ducker@miradu·
soc 2 has never been great but it seems to have fully crossed the scam chasm ever since vanta showed how to productize it.
English
0
0
2
223
Michael Ducker
Michael Ducker@miradu·
@sdamico Magic. Congratulations! I can’t wait for a low dose daily oral retratrutide.
English
1
0
6
6.4K
Sam D'Amico
Sam D'Amico@sdamico·
@miradu 1) paying for equinox (and not going) 2) retatrutide 3) finasteride 4) (oral) minoxidil + taladafil (this is what actually fixed my BP as weight loss only got me to like 125/85) 5) microneedling for 6 months on the hairline 6) some vitamins off and on?
English
13
0
132
13.9K
Dennis Jiang
Dennis Jiang@imdennisjiang·
Had a great time at the Agent Builder's Breakfast yesterday. If you're interested, it happens every Thursday in SOMA! More here: agentbuildersbreakfast.com Thanks for hosting @miradu!
English
1
0
1
42
Michael Ducker
Michael Ducker@miradu·
@sm what's amazing is airlines will actually sell you this via a stop
English
0
0
0
12
Michael Ducker
Michael Ducker@miradu·
These programattic ads are getting really good
Michael Ducker tweet media
English
2
0
6
322
Michael Ducker nag-retweet
Karri Saarinen
Karri Saarinen@karrisaarinen·
I think we have lost some sense of judgment and moderation when it comes to product building currently. The moment you turn something into a universally celebrated metric, whether that is token burn, prototype count, or percentage of agent-written code, you start losing sight of what actually matters. I have felt the same way for a long time about overusing data and A/B testing to build products. The moment you reduce product quality or productivity to a metric, you stop shipping value and start shipping numbers. A lot of what people are doing with AI makes directional sense. The missing piece is counterbalance: 1. AI should help engineers build better products. Leaderboards and adoption metrics can be useful as directional signals. They do not tell you what is being built, whether it is good, or whether it should exist at all. 2. Users do not care what percentage of your code was written by agents. They care about the outcome. Faster output is useful. Like usually, faster doesn't seem to add to quality, clarity, or stability of products. Power to build should not become an excuse to lower quality bars. 3. LLM-generated prototypes can feel like late-night whiteboarding sessions. They look exciting in the moment and feel productive very quickly. Then a few days later you realize the idea was shallow, distracting, or simply wrong. The same trap shows up in jumping straight to code and solutions more broadly. You may just be building the wrong thing more efficiently. Prototyping has its place. So do clear thinking, good design, and a real understanding of the user’s problem. In terms of activities or momentum, the main quest and the side quest can both feel productive but only one actually moves the mission forward. 4. Adding more to products is still dangerous as ever even if time or effort to add it has gone down. Every addition creates complexity, maintenance cost, and user confusion. New features should be pushed back unless they clearly show it should exist and how it improves the product. 5. Not everything needs to be an agent shaped. A simple scheduled task does not need a full LLM sandbox. Making something agentic because it feels current or impressive does not make it right-sized, correct, or effective. The core ideas are: - even if you can, maybe you should not. - more power we have to build should not reduce our need to think, it should increase it.
dax@thdxr

sent this to the team today everything great comes from being able to delay gratification for as long as possible and it feels like we're collectively losing our ability to do that

English
30
126
1.1K
146.8K
Simon Taylor
Simon Taylor@sytaylor·
The thirst for mindshare in agentic commerce and payments is UNHINGED rn. Everyone knows it will go parabolic. Nobody knows when. Such a weird dynamic.
Romford, London 🇬🇧 English
28
8
109
9.9K
Michael Ducker
Michael Ducker@miradu·
are we asking our AI to post on websites to then screenshot as social proof now? or is it that the ai agent's opinion is the social proof? this is a rabbit hole to untangle
Michael Ducker tweet media
English
0
0
1
179
Michael Ducker
Michael Ducker@miradu·
so claude code is down - is today the day i try codex cli?
English
2
0
0
473