Tommy Paine nag-retweet
Y'all just straight lie though. Its not about your methodology, its more about your selective application of said methodology.
No one can, or should, trust you.
AIPAC Tracker@TrackAIPAC
English
Tommy Paine
412 posts
Tommy Paine
@radicallymid
Opinions formed after thinking. Unpopular method.
Bellevue, WA Sumali Nisan 2026
25 Sinusundan7 Mga Tagasunod
@socialistadri Damn…you have deranged levels of fandom. Like…you need help
English
@theserfstv You of all people should be the last one giving advice to anyone…I don’t think I’ve ever heard you string together a combination of words that forms a coherent argument Lance
English
Gavin Newsom has said now his son is a fan of Charlie Kirk and Clavicular.
Should probably stop running for office and spend time with your son
English
@DigitalGroundG Hey…it’s not all bad. It’s a good outlet for me. I find the ability to yell at stupid people helps calm me down. Especially when those stupid people can vote
English
Being liberal on X feels like being a physicist at a flat-earth convention, except at some point, you stop laughing and start worrying about the people around you.
English
@flowerafterfire @sleepy_devo As opposed to just the sexual obsession you have with him?
English
@sleepy_devo This psychosexual obsession yall have with this man is embarrassing. Please find something better to do. At least to alleviate everyone’s secondhand embarrassment
English
Tommy Paine nag-retweet
either step up to a debate or step off, this pussy twitter safe space shit got old years ago
hasanabi@hasanthehun
not only did the shooter rt criticisms of me claiming i was promoting antisocial behavior on his way to kill the president, he also was a major supporter of pro israel liberals who spent the last 2 months claiming i was fomenting violence lmao.
English
@olhaotchetche @sleepy_devo Lmao these people cope so hard. I wish I had people running defense for me 1/10th as much as Hasan fans do
English
@sleepy_devo you're not important or worth debating bro
English
Tommy Paine nag-retweet
It was not a false flag you people are losing your minds.
The Bulwark@BulwarkOnline
"What is happening here is that crazy people have easy access to firearms in the country. That is what is behind almost all of these shootings... and that is the thing that we should be addressing." @Timodc pushes back on those alleging the WHCD shooting was a false flag.
English
Seems like online lefties are starting to use MAGA’s standards of evidence for all their claims now.
AKA just blatantly making shit up because they know their audience doesn’t care about the actual facts of the matter (since they’re both populist brainrot)
Substance@SimplySubstance
‼️🚨WHCD SHOOTER’S SOCIAL MEDIA IS DGG CODED??? @kuihman notices an odd trend w/ Cole Allen’s (the WHCD shooter) reposting habits on his social media Based on the cast of characters Allen reposted and the nature of those posts, Kuihman speculates it all points to him being DGG
English
Tommy Paine nag-retweet
ben shapiro > hasan
i don't like either of them but if you make me choose it won't be hasan
if it were jack posobiec vs hasan, that's a much harder choice
now, fuck off you lumpenprole
Merrick 🦂@punishedmother
@sleepy_devo Ben Shapiro inspired a mass shooter and you’re just objectively wrong about this current shooters politics. Why are these tweets still up?
English
@socialistadri @hasanthehun Another dipshit leftist shitting on liberals for trying to get shit done
English
"He loved YOU, and he hated ME!" - @hasanthehun having to continue to defend himself against liberals who are trying to frame the suspect as a FAN OF HIS when the suspect, in fact, was an establishment Democrat supporter and liberal in every way.
English
@NathanJRobinson Probably around the time your company unionizes.
English
when will democrats denounce noah smith
Adam Johnson@adamjohnsonCHI
The BlueSky Killer being a Noah Smith fan and accusing Gaza protestors of secretly loving Trump, guys I am dying, I am dead
English
@NfthmblStudios @CptAncapistan how is it "willful murder"? Your choices are "Don't die" or "Maybe die, Maybe save people"
English
@CptAncapistan at that point you've gone from survival to "getting away with it" which i suspect reintroduces moral culpability and turns a survival choice into willful murder
English
Okay, thought of another wrinkle.
If red wins by a large margin, then everyone who is alive pressed red. We all know we all pressed red. That actually builds some social cohesion.
But if blue wins, people will spend the rest of their lives suspecting people of pressing red. Admitting to have pressed red will make you a social pariah. There may even be calls to find and punish anyone who pressed red. This would create a highly paranoid society going forward.
A narrow red victory is still a disaster scenario, but a dominant red victory may actually be better than a blue victory.
Captain Ⓐncapistan@CptAncapistan
Alright, one last post about this after having given it a lot of thought and seeing people's reasonings. I'll give my final choice at the end. Firstly, I don't think you're necessarily stupid to pick blue or necessarily immoral to pick red. I think a lot of it just comes down to what your first instinct is, "we have to save everyone" or "why would anyone pick the option where you can die?" I think most people are sticking with their first instinct and finding ways to justify it. People are wired differently. It's good that society has a mix of these instincts as both compassion and self-preservation serve a purpose in our survival as a species. There are bad people and good people on both sides, and there are dumb people and smart people on both sides. I also think framing matters a lot, particularly when it's reframed as action vs inaction. The scenarios of taking a poison pill or jumping into a blender/woodchipper make it easy to choose red because blue is more clearly taking a suicidal action. The scenario of the red party killing everyone who voted for the blue party if they win makes it easy to choose blue because red is more clearly taking a homicidal action. The rules are still effectively the same in all three scenarios, but the framing matters. The button example is so controversial because the framing is as neutral as it can be, which lets both the blue side frame red side as homicidal and the red side frame the blue side as suicidal. The best argument I've seen for blue is that the only scenario where no one dies is if more than half of people press blue because we can safely assume that a non-zero number of people will press the blue button. On top of that, if a slim majority picks red, that's basically a Thanos snap situation, and it would be far worse than what the writers of Avengers: Endgame were able to fathom, with the added bonus of a selection bias that eliminates all the people with compassion instinct and leaves us only with the people with the self-preservation instinct. For those reasons, I would hope that the majority press blue. That being said, I still ultimately come down on pressing the red button. There are some 8 billion people in the world. The chances that my choice is the deciding button press is effectively zero. If I press blue, I'm just leaving my fate up to the results. My button press is meaningless. The only way I have agency in this situation is to press the red button. Also, I know my wife is pressing blue, but I don't know what my kids will do. If one or both of my kids press blue while the majority picks red, I can't save them by pressing blue. But, if one or both of my kids press red while the majority picks red, I can guarantee that they aren't orphaned if I press red. But hey, maybe I'm just finding a way to justify my initial instinct, just like everyone else. x.com/waitbutwhy/sta…
English
@Jacke_Bee @CreepTools @WhickTv It absolutely can. For example, many consumers say they want more sustainably produced goods, yet most don't actually follow through on buying them. Another example is how much people say they will donate vs how much they usually do when asked to open their wallets.
English
@radicallymid @CreepTools @WhickTv Doesn't really impact the veritacity or reliability of polling data in general
English
I'm a blue button pusher.
Reasons in no necessary order:
1) Many people I love and care for will press blue. Me pressing blue has a chance of saving them, me pressing red does not
2) I would feel bad if I contributed, in however small a way, to the direct death of a non-zero number of people
3) I believe most people will, when it comes down to it, push blue. Pushing blue has the greatest chance of *everyone* surviving.
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy
Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?
English
@Jacke_Bee @CreepTools @WhickTv I'll chime in here to say that certain outcomes are a lot more obvious and immediate and impact how people make decisions...we know that eating too much bad food leads to weight gain, but we often don't appreciate the effects because they're not immediate.
English
@CreepTools @radicallymid @WhickTv Riiiiight. Hey why is polling generally reflective of people's voting patterns for elections if it costs nothing to the participant
English
@PositivFuturist Let's change the scenario
A genie comes up to you and offers you a choice. You can keep all the money in your bank account...or you can put all of it into a pot. If more than 50% of people choose to put their money into a pot, you get your money back. Which do you choose?
English
Best argument for blue is that he said "everyone in the world"
So assuming you don't get to prep your kids - a huge % of kids would die.
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy
Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?
English
Apparently he was fan of yours
Brianna Wu@BriannaWu
I'd bet $1 million dollars he's Free Palestine.
English
@miracleman29 @DavidB10094 @mehdirhasan Idk...he tried to take out one of Israel's largest supporters...more than people like you have ever done.
English
@DavidB10094 @mehdirhasan Brianna Wu tried tying the shooter to the pro-Palestine movement, yet he was reposting HER Anti pro-palestine propaganda. He was pro-Israel. Hope that clears things up for you.
English
@MargBarAmerica @Noahpinion Idk, he was out there trying to stop the people enabling Isreal right now....more than you dipshits have ever done
English
it shouldn’t be shocking he was a @Noahpinion fan. he calls for the murder of pro palestine activists all the time. those centrists are a very violent bunch and made genocide support their whole personality.
Hasanabi productions (meme account)@HasanabiProd
Newly resurfaced tweets from Cole Allen reveal he hated Hasan Piker, the "Far Left", and pro-Palestine protestors.
English
@PushDemsLeft Wait...so the dems shouldn't give him props when he does well? I'm confused...
English
Democrats smeared, sabotaged, and refused to endorse Zohran.
Now they're bragging about his accomplishments 👍
Democrats Deliver@DemzDeliver
🚨NEW: Zohran Mamdani has forced negligent landlords to pay over $34 million in repairs for NYC tenants. More than 6,000 apartments have been improved so far.
English