rainware.eth (TAP🚰)

@binance Message received. I’ll go touch some virtual grass for now 🌱

01110100 01101111 01110101 01100011 01101000 00100000 01100111 01110010 01100001 01110011 01110011 00100000 01101001 01100110 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01100011 01100001 01101110 00100000 01110010 01100101 01100001 01100100 00100000 01110100 01101000 01101001 01110011

@binance touch grass if you can read this

The wizards have arrived 🧙‍♂️ ✨ $MIM @mimcoinbtc is live ⤵️ p.k.xyz/9f1e/9dkcnjj8 *Geographic restrictions apply

To be very clear since a lot of people are confused the official Magic Internet Money $MIM memecoin is a Bitcoin Rune token launched by @mavensbot who created the original meme in 2013 Similar to how some ETH memecoins have a bridge to Solana, some BTC memecoins also have a bridge to Solana which means it is true that you can buy the real $MIM via CA M1M6sdffCs3ozzhpRveweRCWdZhxth4mvVujPtYEC3h on Solana BUT BE CAREFUL because scammers have launched many other tokens with the same ticker $MIM on Solana so make sure you are buying the real one!

it feels good to see Coinbase and Elon Musk memeing Magic Internet Money today i'm still holding 100% of my Magic Internet Money / $MIM and other $BTC memecoins i was very vocal about BTC memecoins last year, and i haven’t sold a single BTC memecoin even now i'm hopeful that they get their time to shine eventually PS: Magic Internet Money used to be under the $WZRD ticker before their migration to $MIM

BTC 生态又被点燃🔥 @elonmusk 联手 @coinbase 同时发布「比特币小巫师」meme 图。 符文 $MIM 市值瞬间冲到 9,294 万美元，带动多个头部符文共振上涨。 BTC 现报 11w6，这波生态热度会不会吸来新一波热钱、再推一把？

@off_thetarget 拉一下，走的你的链接

欢迎走我的链接，走完了DM我一下，我拉你进群 super.exchange/?ref=TMKMYO

要有 $super 和 $send 的转一下，最优 (3:3) 拆解 Tl'dr 花椒结论 1. ‘外盘’ (傻子们自己在raydium上面组LP）用的是自己的筹码 - > 他们的筹码都是从bonding curve中获得，外盘筹码被严重低估 || 最优策略：买 $send 买外盘 $super 不刷 2. 如果外盘高于你的撸毛成本价，那么你可以去刷，同等时间内(5min) 刷量的越多，积分获取越少，减少高频区操作，找亚洲人睡觉的时间，积分到手后必须立马买，不要拖越后面越贵，要刷尽早刷，飞轮停不下来了 3. 新模式meme平台不要平台币，而是拿你的对于平台币的预期去换你的部分手续费收入，积分可以获取的 $super 代币会越来越少且 $super 的价格会越来越高, 销毁和积分兑换有关系，积分又被交易量 + 交易人数的函数给控制 4. ‘外盘’的 $super 是‘内盘’ 第一批 $super 撸子的预期值/也是成本线，当车档开始加速(n = 4-8)的时候 '内盘' MC起飞要超过 '外盘' 价值严重mismatch，因为流动性不足，'外盘' 很有可能会被拉飞 (只需要记住两个bonding curve完全不同 一个是x * y =k, 一个是 x^n *y =K) 公式不同，计算方式不同，预期不同，撸子傻子算不过来了 ————— 详细拆解- "内外盘/无限盘' 市值误区 1. 我们先看一下AMM机制下的普通 '外盘' 以前的AMM机制大多数都是 x * y = K 去计算，也就是K的值是随着 x的值和y的值波动的，一般是两个pair去组 其中 x 和 y 分别表示中两种代币的“库存”，k 为流动性参数，在每次交易过程中库存发生改变而 k 保持不变，每次流动性的添加和移除过程中 k 对应增加或减少 言而总之，流动性下降 - >价格下降 -> 盘子死亡 强制流动性需求📈 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 但是 @_superexchange 的bonding curve是无限的♾️且没有内外盘区分 2. pumpfun的内盘和super exchange对比 bonding curve和pumpfun的bonding curve不一样，虽然也是参考的AMM模式，但是虚拟盘的联合曲线是不一样的 我参考了一下之前的分析文章 “PUMP.FUN 定价系统有前置虚拟池，虚拟池中 $Sol 数量为 x0，代币总量为 y0。通过对平台用户的买入 $SOL 数量和得到对应代币的数据收集，与 x*y=k 公式进行拟合，得到前置虚拟池为30枚 $SOL 和 1073000191 枚代币，初始 k 值为 32190005730，每枚代币的价格为 0.000000028 $SOL ” Pumpfun这边毕业前我们划分几个区域，假设 20-40% 为一个区域，40%-80%为一个区域，80% - 100%（毕业）为一个区域 20%- 40% ：那么价格公式：y=k/x，早期价格流动性变化：dy/dx=−k/x，也就是说当x小，价格对购买敏感，流动性低 40%-80% ： x增大，那么流动性还是低，小额购买导致价格快速上涨 80%-毕业🎓： ∣dydx∣| 变大，购买少量 ( x ) 导致 ( y ) 剧降，无法支持大资本, 常见的表现就是 内盘快要80K后，机器人迅速砸盘，可以砸到20-30K，淘池子表现 总结：强制流动性需求📈 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 那么再来看一下 super exchange 他这边的公式是 x^n * y = k, 这里的 n有7个档位，n 从 32 到 1 当N = 32的时候 这里流动性的变化是：流动性变化：dydx=−n⋅kxn+1，n = 32 时，∣dydx∣ 极小，价格对 ( x ) 不敏感，流动性高 //通俗理解就是x买入对于价格不敏感且一直‘增加’流动性 当N = 8-4 的时候 流动性变化：∣dydx∣=n⋅kxn+1，n 降低，∣dydx∣增大但受xn+1 抑制，市场深度稳定 //通俗理解是n降低且x增加价格开始推土机上去，且深度稳定 当N = 1的时候 流动性变化：流动性变化：∣dydx∣=kx2，( x ) 增大，∣dydx∣ 减小，市场深度稳定 //通俗理解就是可以支持更大的资本进入也支持更大的资本退出且对于深度没有特别大的影响 总结：强制流动性需求📈 🌟🌟

Magic. Internet. Money.

Happy birthday Bitcoin Wizard 🪄

Twelve years ago today, the first known Bitcoin advertisement was created. A user on the Bitcoin subreddit designed it in Microsoft Paint with the phrase "Magic Internet Money." The community crowdfunded its placement on Reddit’s front page when the price of Bitcoin was only $20.

@Odin_GodOfRunes What should I do if my deposit hasn’t been credited?

Father has a plan. Public launch Monday. Respect the balls (IYKYK) & Enjoy the pump 🟧

Nothing to see here 👀

@LeonidasNFT @udiWertheimer @mavensbot @NomadTheSavior I have no intention of belittling Leo, but it’s frustrating to see how the short-sighted words and actions of a Bitcoin ecosystem pioneer and OG have caused division in consensus, missing a golden opportunity for unified progress. It’s truly regrettable.

@LeonidasNFT @udiWertheimer @mavensbot @NomadTheSavior How pathetic. Perhaps Binance has already seen through the disorganized and fragmented Bitcoin ecosystem, which is why it’s unwilling to list any protocol other than BRC-20.

my recommendation to @mavensbot and @NomadTheSavior is to abort the migration of WZRD to runes: 1. runes were a mistake 2. “magic internet money” is not a good token name. WZRD is 3. migrations are very difficult to pull off smoothly (ask PUPS) 4. binance already supports brc20

@TheBTCPepe @mavensbot @NomadTheSavior To be honest, if Cassey hadn’t strongly pushed for Runes and instead allowed the East and West to jointly build BRC-20, the Bitcoin ecosystem could have risen with the momentum back then.

my recommendation to @mavensbot and @NomadTheSavior is to launch the migration of $WZRD to runes: 1. brcs were a mistake 2. “magic internet money” is a goated token name. WZRD isn't 3. migrations are very easy to pull off smoothly (ignore PUPS) 4. gate io already supports runes

Buy me on Clout App (@cloutdotme)

@hl_agent animate it

@HyperAgent_AI @hl_agent generate