#ExDemocrat 🇺🇸🇨🇦🇬🇧🇦🇺🇮🇱🇮🇳

Please read & share. Watch the pop-up video of @TarekFatah speaking on the bottom of the article page. torontosun.com/opinion/column… @SunLorrie Then give #TarekFatah's daughter a follow: @NatashaFatah (Can we find that video link somewhere @TheTorontoSun?) 💐#RIPTarekFatah🩷

@realMaalouf Islam has concept of sex slaves allowed in their Book and they are called war booty - maal-e-ghanimat. Men are just traded since beginning of time

@realMaalouf They litterally sell their ki ds

The Islamic slave trade started centuries earlier, enslaved millions more Africans and lasted longer than the European/Atlantic slave trade. Why are we only taught about the latter?

The Arab Muslim slave trade began centuries before the European one and is recognised as the longest in history, spanning over 1,300 years. It forcibly removed millions of Africans from their homelands and subjected them to brutal conditions while they laboured in foreign lands. To prevent reproduction, men and boys were often castrated, a brutal procedure that killed many. While Europe abolished the practice FIRST, centuries ago, and the United States officially ended it in 1865, many Arab countries continued the trade well into the 20th century, and reports suggest some Islamic countries still practise it. Anyone who thinks Europeans were worse than Muslim Arabs is uneducated and has been misled by Islamic propaganda in universities.

🇬🇷🇸🇦🇮🇷A Greek-operated Patriot system deployed in Saudi Arabia intercepted and destroyed two Iranian ballistic missiles. “The Greek Patriot battery demonstrated its operational readiness and experience.”

On March 30, 1822, the Chios Massacre took place. The Muslim Turks slaughtered 42.000 women, men & children (Greek Christians). Additionally, 52.000 were sold as slaves in the markets of Smyrna & Constantinople.

On September 1, 1821, Samothrace was devastated by the Muslim Turks through a general massacre led by the Turkish Kara Ali. Approximately 10.000 men & boys (Greek Christians) were slaughtered. Women & children were sold in the markets of Constantinople & Smyrna.

This has been going on for a long time

@HomerPavlos @_________Johann Barbarians indeed.

A Muslim tries to interrupt a Greek Orthodox liturgy in Greece, like they do in the rest of Europe, but it's not working in Greece. If you don't respect us you are going to have a problem. Get out of my country, filthy barbarians.

My heart goes out to the martyrs of freedom in Iran.

@Aliceshaw25 yes

🚨 BREAKING: Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) just voted NO on advancing the SAVE America Act. She represents a state that Trump won by 13 points in 2024. Should she be considered a traitor and challenged in a primary ? A. Yes B. No

Summary from Prime Minister Netanyahu’s remarks this evening: “Iran has no ability to enrich uranium and they have no ability to produce ballistic missiles. We have killed thousands of murderers in Iran. We have destroyed hundreds of launchers and missiles. Yesterday, we destroyed the entire Iranian fleet in the Caspian Sea. We are striking them in the streets and at checkpoints. It is too early to say whether the Iranian people will take advantage of the conditions to go out into the streets, but in the end, it will depend solely on them. The State of Israel is stronger than ever and Iran is weaker than ever. We are a regional power and in several fields we are a global power. We are working on new alliances that will be discussed further. One of our hands holds the sword of David and the other is extended in peace. You ask how long this will take? It will take as long as necessary!”

Yes, AND visa holders already are counted on our census btw. Not just illegals. Visa holders. VISA HOLDERS.

🚨Arizonans WE should be LEADING this effort. The SAVE America Act ELIMINATES Federal Only voting. Arizona has Fed Only elections because federal law mandates use of the federal registrations form requiring attestation, not proof of citizenship. SAVE eliminates the loophole.

@KimberlyEliseC Yes. Also legal immigrants are different than illegal aliens.

Such a sad red herring argument you make. The objection to immigrants is none of the items listed in your graphic. The objection is that they bring a different morality with them. What you describe are ethnic components, while culture includes ethnic but also moral components. Two moralities cannot coexist in a single society. Two moralities will clash where they differ significantly, and will continue to clash until one erases the other. On an individual level, morality is at the core of the individual, and forms the backbone of a practical way of working within society without being fully conscious of it. We do things everyday that are moral habits, often without thinking about them. It is not that people object to outsiders, but it is that they object to outsiders who refuse to adapt their morality to the established morality of the U.S. Even worse, people object to outsiders who want to come here and impose their morality on native born Americans. Many who do not recognize this core issue (moral conflict) have broken convictions. Their only convictions are that everyone ought to be able to access whatever social or material resources they desire without cost, and that no one should be subjected to any consequences for any choices or actions, including natural consequences. These two convictions drive their thinking, as they seek to impose their moral convictions on others. We apply a number of names to this morality, such as "woke," "leftist," "liberal." In reality, they have taken the world-view of a small child (I want it so I should get it, and I don't want bad things to happen no matter what) and built a philosophy around it. This morality is appealing, of course, but it reveals a deeply self-centered attitude, while creating the illusion of caring for others. The care for others comes from necessity of extending my desires to others to qualify me for my desires. If the individual says, "He doesn't deserve that," then it can be said "There are things I don't deserve." Likewise, if I say, "he deserves consequences," then it might also be said, "I deserve consequences." All benevolence exist that the individual might gain resources and avoid consequences. It is all very idealistic, and somewhat agnostic of the way the world really works. This morality has one enemy. The enemy of this morality is anything that denies the two core foundations of the morality. If someone says, you should have to earn what you get, then they are immoral. If someone says, "that person should be punished that justice may be satisfied," such a statement is immoral. And how do people who ascribe to this immorality handle sin? As all moralities handle sin, with judgement and consequences. To avoid the problems with immigration, the proponents of this world-view must avoid judgment for anyone. Thus it is accepted that two moralities can live side-by-side in the same society, because no one can be assigned consequences, or deemed less deserving or said to be invalid. This is, of course, an irrational position to hold. Two moralities cannot exist in the same society, and the inevitable end of two moralities being in the same space is a conflict for dominance. Making it about pizza and tea is a way to avoid talking about the moral differences.