Morlex

20 posts

Morlex banner
Morlex

Morlex

@0xMorlex

AI researcher & builder | Content creator | Notes from the edge

NYC شامل ہوئے Mayıs 2026
32 فالونگ43 فالوورز
Morlex
Morlex@0xMorlex·
Anthropic engineer just walked through how to ship a production-ready agent in minutes instead of months 17 minutes. free. by Jess Yan, Anthropic Member of Technical Staff worth more than any $500 vibe-coding course here's what she covers: • Managed Agents Anthropic hosts the infra, you ship the logic • no glue code, no orchestration layer, no homemade memory store • the gap between "I built a demo" and "it runs in prod" • why most teams take 6 months for what now takes an afternoon most builders are still wiring custom stacks while the ones who get this skip straight to shipping watch the session, then read the full hidden Claude features guide below ↓
0xMorty@0xMortyx

x.com/i/article/2062…

English
4
3
17
711
Morlex
Morlex@0xMorlex·
@0xChaseTM Karpathy is currently revolutionizing the world of AI
English
1
0
2
35
Chase
Chase@0xChaseTM·
"AI hasn't changed my work at all" - Karpathy just explained who that's really about The co-founder of OpenAI admitted the part no one says out loud: the people getting incredible results from AI aren't smarter than you. They just stopped doing the one thing you still do, and it's quietly wasting every prompt you send "you can outsource your thinking, but you can't outsource your understanding" The model isn't the variable anymore - everyone has the same Claude. What splits the people shipping real work from the people calling it "mid" is judgment: knowing how to direct it, what to hand off, what to verify He drew a hard line between vibe coding - casual, hope-it-works prompting - and what he calls agentic engineering: actually knowing how to steer the thing That second skill is 5 prompts you have to know ↓
Chase@0xChaseTM

x.com/i/article/2060…

English
11
9
43
2.8K
Morlex
Morlex@0xMorlex·
@YotamBlu yeah mate, u are absolutely right
English
0
0
0
4
Yotam Blumenkranz
Yotam Blumenkranz@YotamBlu·
@0xMorlex that's the move right there. anthropic just flipped the script on how fast you can actually ship something real. the $500 courses were selling you the feeling of progress. this is just progress.
English
1
0
1
3
Morlex
Morlex@0xMorlex·
@Atenov_D I'll give your strategy and try
English
0
0
0
251
Atenov int.
Atenov int.@Atenov_D·
$1,000 in free GPT credits. Official OpenAI form. Takes 3 minutes to fill. People are sleeping on this. OpenAI opened a promo form for Codex Enterprise credits. My contacts applied and received $1,000 in API tokens after one week. The form is still live. Here's the exact flow: → go to openai(.)com/form/codex-enterprise-promo → enter the email tied to your OpenAI account → fill out all fields - explain what you're building and why you need the credits → wait one week Write something real. The more specific your use case, the better the chances. Generic answers get ignored. $1,000 in API credits. Official OpenAI program. One week wait. Apply today while the form is open.
Atenov int. tweet media
Atenov int.@Atenov_D

GPT-5.5 + Claude Sonnet 4.6. Free $20 trial. No card required. Zed just hands it to you. Most AI IDEs run on Electron. Zed is built in Rust - rendering goes directly through Metal, DirectX, Vulkan. No Node runtime. No Chromium overhead. The result: responses that feel instant compared to Cursor or VS Code. >AI is built into the core of the editor, not added as an extension. That's the difference between native and bolted-on. Here's the setup: → zed(.)dev - sign in via GitHub (account needs 1+ month of activity) → download the IDE → click Start Trial → $20 in credits lands instantly, no card, no form GPT-5.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 available immediately. Zed also connects to Gemini, Ollama locally, and any provider via Open CDP. One more thing: real-time multiplayer collaboration built in natively. Like Google Docs but inside your IDE. No extensions, no plugins. $20 free. Fastest AI IDE available right now. One GitHub login.

English
25
12
242
31.9K
Morlex
Morlex@0xMorlex·
@0x_fokki thanks bro, i hope it’s will be helpful
English
0
0
0
8
Fokki
Fokki@0x_fokki·
@0xMorlex makes sense to see that session
English
1
0
1
49
Insomnia
Insomnia@insomnia_vip·
@0xMorlex I wanna to see full lecture mate
English
1
0
1
27
Morlex
Morlex@0xMorlex·
An Anthropic engineer spent 15 minutes on stage explaining how they actually build agents the takeaway is almost boring: a clear role, the right context, the right tools, no frameworks, no magic that's not a research project. that's a claude project Most people use claude ai like a search bar. Open tab, ask, close, repeat. Every session starts from zero. Projects kill that. System prompt + your files + memory that persists across every chat. That's not a chat window it's a full-time specialist that already knows you. the 7 i run every day: → morning brief: news + inbox + tasks in 3 min → content engine: writes in my voice, not "AI voice" → research lab: deep dives that remember every session → second brain: connects everything I've ever saved → inbox zero: triages + drafts the whole inbox in 10 min → code helper: already knows my stack, no re-explaining → strategist: honest pushback, not comfortable answers 7 specialists. one $20 sub. setup cost: one weekend The part everyone skips: the context files. The system prompt is copy-paste. The files are what make it yours Watch the 15-min talk, then save the full setup below
0xMorty@0xMortyx

x.com/i/article/2061…

English
4
1
24
2.1K
Morlex
Morlex@0xMorlex·
GitHub VP on running Claude at scale: At enterprise volume, the model isn't the bottleneck the harness around it is In 30 minutes Mario Rodriguez reveals GitHub's actual production stack: caching, harnesses, advisor models that review every call Caching + harnesses + advisors Worth more than a $500 vibe-coding course
English
2
1
18
262
Alex
Alex@de1lymoon·
@0xMorlex good material for study, i've saved it
English
1
0
1
57
West Lord
West Lord@MyWestLord·
Most people use Claude like Google. Ask a question. Get an answer. Close the tab. Here’s what the other 5% are doing: → Building entire websites and mobile apps no code. A song randomizer that used to take months. Done in 1 hour. UI, UX, backend Claude handles all of it. → Scraping YouTube videos, articles, and API docs in seconds. Paste a link. Get a 4-minute brief instead of 50 hours of reading. → Plan Mode breaks your prompt into sub-tasks and catches what you missed. You think you know what you’re building. You don’t. Plan Mode figures it out before you waste 3 hours on the wrong version. → /everyone shows every message you’ve sent. Click any of them. Project reverts to that exact point. → /output style explanatory every Claude response now includes a box explaining exactly why it made that decision. → Auto-review on every GitHub PR. Claude watches the pull request before it merges. No deleted files. No surprise rollbacks. You’re using 10% of a tool that’s free. The other 90% is sitting there waiting.
Moysei@0xMoysei

x.com/i/article/2061…

English
5
3
30
1.5K
Alex
Alex@de1lymoon·
@0xMorlex just 6 patterns you have to try, thanks for sharing alpha
English
1
0
1
97
Morlex
Morlex@0xMorlex·
Andrej Karpathy keeps repeating one idea: the gap stopped being talent. it's leverage anthropic just showed the Claude Code version of that idea: you don't need one smarter agent. you need an org of agents a real engineering pod researcher, builder, reviewer, QA, strategist costs $20,000+/m as a solo builder you can't justify that, so you do all five jobs yourself and call it discipline here's what most people miss: you don't need a team of people. you need their roles. and a role is just system instructions, context, tools, and a clear job. that's exactly what Dynamic Workflows are 6 patterns, one Claude Code setup: > classifier: figures out what kind of task this is > fan-out agents: split 50 files, bugs, docs, or claims into parallel work > verifier: checks the result without self-bias > filter: kills weak ideas before they reach you > tournament judge: picks winners through pairwise comparison > loop agent: keeps going until the goal is actually done the old move was asking Claude to do the work. the new move is asking Claude to design the machine that does the work most people are still prompting like employees. the move is being the org. watch Karpathy’s talk, then save the 14-step Claude Code setup below
Codez@0xCodez

x.com/i/article/2062…

English
3
1
22
797
Morlex
Morlex@0xMorlex·
@0xCodez Thank you for such an alpha
English
0
0
0
17
Codez
Codez@0xCodez·
@0xMorlex Amazing share bro ! thanks for your support
English
1
0
1
73
Morlex
Morlex@0xMorlex·
@helperone_ai templates as a base, then tweak per task, output stays surprisingly stable once the role prompt's locked in
English
0
0
0
14
HelperOne.ai
HelperOne.ai@helperone_ai·
@0xMorlex Do you script the role prompts or tweak them per task? Curious how stable the output stays
English
1
0
1
14
Morlex
Morlex@0xMorlex·
Andrej Karpathy keeps repeating one idea: the gap stopped being talent. it's leverage a real team researcher, writer, editor, assistant, strategist costs ~$5,000/mo. as a solo creator you can't justify that, so you do all five jobs yourself and call it discipline. here's what most people miss: you don't need a team of people. you need their roles. and a role is just a system instructions, context, the right tool. that's exactly what an agent is. 5 roles, one $20 Claude sub: > research analyst: turns 45 min of scrolling into a 3-min brief > content writer: writes in your voice, not a generic one > editor: kills the weak draft before the internet sees it > exec assistant: triages the inbox, picks your top 3 > strategist: decides what to make, pushes back when you're wrong a $5,000 team for $20. zero sick days, zero onboarding, drafts at 3am most people are still the employee. the move is being the org watch the talk, then save the full setup below
0xMorty@0xMortyx

x.com/i/article/2061…

English
4
9
43
3.4K
Alex
Alex@de1lymoon·
@0xMorlex leverage > talent. saved this
English
1
0
1
128