Muslim 🇸🇩

AMJ said every ruler since 1903 in Saudi is a Kaffir Muhammed bin Ibrahim was close with the rulers and never made Takfir on the Saudi rulers By AMJ standards Muhammed bin Ibrahim is a Taghut Mushrik Kaffir Murji bootlicker IF they were to be consistent with their Takfir

Project Misguidance, Mr.ذالك لاكن does this often He likes to role play as a student of knowledge who knows the Islam He quotes from books he never touched But his Arabic sentences r horrific How can u trust ur Aqeedah with Mr.ذالك لاكن? He should be in a baby ا ب ت ث class

If you went to a Suhur fest and picked 10 random people Every single one will be more knowledgable than Project Misguidance also known as Mr.ذالك لاكن also known as the head of AMJs puppies 🐶

Some of the Salaf did Istihlal in a time knowledge was most wide spread They were given excuse of Ignorance Ibn Taymiyah says: “And not everyone ignorant on a matter is to be made Takfir on, for this reason some who did Istihlal like a group of the Sahabah and Tabieen-

Khariji makes takfir on Ibn Taymiyyah for the view of udhr bil jahl in shirk, this is what happens when an AMJ watcher stays consistent with his principles

Don’t practise your pathetic Arabic on me and answer the question, is the author a filthy murji, yes or no. If you can’t answer then keep silent.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗠𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗱𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗘𝘁𝗶𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗔𝗹-𝗠𝘂𝗵𝗮𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗔𝗵𝗺𝗮𝗱 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗿 𝗶𝗻 𝗔𝗱𝘃𝗼𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗮 He رحمه الله starts by saying: “I am not an unrealistic man, nor am I advocating for a reckless revolution against the laws (the laws that go against the sharia). I believe that the harm of violence now outweighs its benefit. Rather, I stand before you calling for calm and productive work within the framework of natural progression, so that we may achieve our goal of making our laws a reflection of our Sharia. I know that this cannot be achieved in a day, nor in two days, nor in a year or two. First, I wish to clarify a point to dispel any misconceptions about our cause. I have been known among my brothers and acquaintances for defending scholars in general and the Sharia judiciary in particular. Some people may think that my call leads to a conflict of this kind. But no, the matter is far more serious than that, and our aim is nobler than to turn it into a struggle between two factions or a confrontation between two groups. What we seek is the removal of the humiliation imposed on Muslims and the dignity that has been denied to their Sharia through the imposition of these foreign laws." 𝗛𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗸𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗘𝗴𝘆𝗽𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗮𝘆𝘀: “O men of the legislation in Egypt, I start my call with you, for you are the ones with authority in the land, and the power to command and forbid (matters in the nation) in your hands. You are the ones who make the laws, and your committees are currently working on modifying them according to the principles of 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗻 legislation. Let us come to a common word between us, where we join hands and work sincerely for the sake of God. You are more knowledgeable about the intricacies of legislation, and we are more knowledgeable about the Quran, the Sunnah, and matters regarding the Sharia; if we cooperate, we will produce the best outcomes!” 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗸𝗵 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝘂𝗲𝘀 𝗯𝘆 𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 𝘁𝗼 𝗮𝗯𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗼𝗻 𝗳𝗮𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗺 𝘁𝗼𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝗽𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝘂𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗻𝘀: He says: “I call you to abandon the fanaticism for the legislation of the Europeans and their opinions. I do not say that we will abandon our fanaticism for Islam; rather, I invite you to join us in being passionate about it, 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗠𝘂𝘀𝗹𝗶𝗺𝘀 𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝘂𝘀. 𝗢𝘂𝗿 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗶𝘁 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗯𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗚𝗼𝗱 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗗𝗮𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁!"

i’m not really on a madhab rn, still learning. salafi approach just makes sense to me (qur’an & sunnah), but i don’t see it as a madhab. and yeah I respect all the scholars fr like Abu Hanifa, Malik ibn Anas, Al-Shafi‘i, Ahmad ibn Hanbal … they’re way above us.