
AndyMac
1K posts

AndyMac
@AndyrooMac
Agressively optomistic but realistically pragmatic 🌊🤙🏼. $rklb🚀, $oust 🤖, $brun ⛅, $slnh🔋, $asts📱, $abcl🧬, $voyg🛰️



As you may know, $SLNH is planning a buildout of its 4.3 GW facility. Currently priced at a ~$207M MC, that would put it's value at ~$48.1M/GW, or $0.048B/GW. Meanwhile, adjacent names are valued much higher for about the same capacity or even less: $CIFR: plans to have 3.4 GW by 2029 - $7.69B MC / 3.4 GW = 2.261B/GW $IREN: plans to have 5+ GW by 2028 - $17B / 5 GW = 3.4B/GW $NBIS: will (allegedly) have 4 GW by EOY - $49.76B / 4 GW = 12.44B/GW Something is definitely wrong here. Either the market has overpriced every neocloud/data center name, OR $SLNH is being severely overlooked amongst its peers... While $NBIS should be accounted for slightly differently since its facility will be up and running by EOY, you can see how much differently these names are valued in comparison. $SLNH should be no exception as it plans to have a larger pipeline than both $CIFR and $NBIS, while being valued at a percentage of these names. Even $TE is valued almost 10x higher than $SLNH with a similar roadmap... Now, this isn't an exact apples to apples comparison. You have to consider execution risk, management, form of energy used, macro factors, etc. However, the theme is there, and the asymmetry is obvious. You can see by the recent volume and the PA over the last couple months that people are catching on. For clarification, I am not bearish on $CIFR $IREN $NBIS or other adjacent names. I do believe that this sector will be leading the markets in the coming quarters or even for a few years to come. However, the play for $SLNH is more than asymmetrical. $SLNH has some serious catching up to do, especially once execution stops being a question of "if" and begins being a question of "when"...



































