radio tv

@jeremykauffman What’s cool about being a real right winger, you can support abortion and gun control, depending on the race

@JanaS158610 @SassySouthBlond @ubiquitousnewt lol I have mortgages to pay I wouldn’t be that dumb

@BestMidwestMan @SassySouthBlond @ubiquitousnewt Yes, you heard it from Rachels lying mouth. They lie all the time and make huge cash of losers like you.

I wouldn't describe Rachel or Andrew Wilson as an authority on stable motherhood or relationships. She has 5 children to 3 different Fathers. One man abandoned her and his two kids over vague “personal issues.” The next Father was a criminal drug abuser who abandoned her and their one child fleeing legal trouble. Only Andrew Wilson gave her the trad family she now preaches. But he only committed to her after he was able to confirm the kids were his via DNA testing. What does that suggest about the dynamic? Rachel has shown self awareness and knows how her blended family looks, downplaying it as “youthful mistakes”. But mistakes these are not. This a well documented, multi year, behavioural pattern of maladaptive mate selection; serial monogamy with successively dysfunctional, low stability males, resulting in three different fathers for five children, two periods of single motherhood, and one tragic child fatality. And yet, she and Andrew think they are best placed to be critics of modern women and they are ab authority of what benevolent, stable family life should be like. Rachel and Andrew have built their entire brand shaming modern women for low partner standards, serial monogamy, single motherhood, and multiple baby daddies, the exact life she lived. Hypocrisy on full display. What kind of man is drawn to such a woman like Rachel Wilson to begin with? Well, Andrew is a bit of a bastard isn't he. Andrew Wilson’s core traits are abrasive high conflict dominance, arrogance paired with defensive aggression, and a rigid insistence on his unchallenged authority. You can see repeatedly by from his debate footage that he is irritable, rude, and bullying in style. Yes, he can be sharp and logical but he routinely shifts to personal attacks, insults, and verbal aggression when he perceives his authority or family is directly challenged. I don't think he can organically evoke genuine deference or voluntary submission from a desirable, respectable, agentic, and stable woman. Such a woman has independent, better mating options and would probably reject the unilateral “he is in charge of everything” authority because it clashes with her core traits. Rachel, shaped by a pattern of suboptimal mate selection and multiple children, has limited mating alternatives. So she explicitly conforms. She states on record that submission means “you submit to your husband in all things,” that Andrew holds charge of everything, and that she performs total domestic service because his dependability finally enabled the homemaking role her prior partners could not. He secures what he needs through a partner whose baggage makes compliance the rational exchange for security. They portray this trade off via a christian redemption narrative they co brand. Interesting.

@BWLH_ I walked out of Django unchained feeling guilty about slavery for about five minutes. Then I googled all the white people enslaved by Arabs and changed my mind.

The most dangerous movie ever made is REMEMBER THE TITANS. Once you accept this, you are ready to do what's necessary to retake America.

@KingArthurWs @dasanaike How did Germany become so cucked since 1945 then? Women voting?

@dasanaike Strongest evidence for the heritability of ideology ever presented.

@olgakhazan Women keep telling each other it’s “dangerous” for a woman to get married with no backup plan. I’ve heard that twice in one month. I’m a man though. I was told women just want a ring and a free house

People who missed out on having babies because of "messages" you received. What were these messages? As someone who writes articles for a living I would love to go as viral as these seemingly very potent girlboss "messages!"

@minttjulep @col_a_buendia @zarathustra5150 We’ll just have to deport them all then

@BestMidwestMan @col_a_buendia @zarathustra5150 those of us who live outside the city don’t want them. we didn’t vote for section 8 and welfare progressive policies, city dwellers did.

Drive around any US city and you'll see housing projects in the heart of town, squalid ghettos mere blocks away from the most expensive historic homes and high end businesses. That's because government uses your tax dollars to subsidize the maintenance of a criminal underclass in zip codes they could otherwise never afford, where they have no business living. Why are urban crime rates so high? Why are urban schools so bad? Why don't more young families live downtown? Section 8 housing is the answer. If we've got to give these people UBI (we don't) we could at least have the decency and practical good sense to build them their own little towns somewhere outside the heart of the city. They don't have some right to the most valuable tracts of land just because their grandmothers also grew up in that same project. They don't own the land but are recipients of public largesse in no position to argue. Bulldoze the projects, relocate their inhabitants, and sell the land for private development or build public parks and you could fix the cities overnight while increasing the tax base. Urban retardation (literal slowing, holding back) is always and everywhere a choice apparently no one is brave enough to stop making.

@JanaS158610 @SassySouthBlond @ubiquitousnewt I thought I heard 18 somewhere. It makes no difference because 13 years is still a good time to be married. Keep the original topic in mind here. People are calling Andrew degenerate for being married to a single mom for 13 years

@BestMidwestMan @SassySouthBlond @ubiquitousnewt Where did you get 18 years then? Why are you lying? Yeah, it is huge diference.

@SassySouthBlond @JanaS158610 @ubiquitousnewt This person is acting like a teenager

@BestMidwestMan @JanaS158610 @ubiquitousnewt What does their age matter? Are you retarded?

@naggingnacyxx If that’s true, what has he hidden if you already know it?

@BestMidwestMan Yes that’s literally the definition of hypocrisy if you’re hiding your past and criticizing others for doing the exact same thing that is literally the definition and meaning of hypocrisy 🤣🐷you’re a fucking retard

@cremieuxrecueil I don’t think hating Jews is synonymous with noticing their nepotism

This is amazing! Apparently we have records of the politics of former Nazis who came to America: we know how they voted and donated! They and their descendants were more conservative, but don't seem to be any more anti-Semitic: loyal republicans without being Jew-haters!

@ihymacc She wouldn’t let a short ugly fat broke guy bang her after saying that

Your modern love story sir

@cremieuxrecueil Or it means the white mom failed at acquiring a white alpha

The ones with Asian dads do have a point. Asian women have a much easier time on the dating market, so the Asian guys who do end up getting married and having kids tend to be a cut above, and that shows up in the kids.

@Just_IsyTM @elonmusk Violent assault and IQ scale will flip over too

@elonmusk Nigerian men are the answers to this. Just send more Nigerian men and watch the scale flip over

This collective suicide of humanity needs to turn around!

@naggingnacyxx Hypocrisy is hiding your past and pointing the finger? There are genuine criticisms of his arguments, but this is not one of them

@BestMidwestMan Again you people don’t understand what hypocrisy is. Hypocrisy is when you say one thing and do another. It could also be hiding your past and pointing the finger at other people which they have done countless times. Also Andrew and Rachel have not been married for 18 years🤣🐷

@JanaS158610 @SassySouthBlond @ubiquitousnewt Not an important detail. How young are you?

@BestMidwestMan @SassySouthBlond @ubiquitousnewt Stop lying..they got married in December 2012, so they are married for 13 years..where did you get 18?? And long after their out of wedlock DNA tested kids were born

@BobJanetmager5 @Joseph_WarrenMD @RUSHMOREonX From what I read, there were three or four other inventors who independently discovered the same thing that Tesla did in different countries in Europe. The TV show positioned to them as rivals for Edison had 1 million of the things going on

@BestMidwestMan @Joseph_WarrenMD @RUSHMOREonX Yeah people don’t read enough. I think Edison was definitely a shady business man and a pos but he didn’t steal his inventions but just scammed and defrauded Tesla

Edison's strict video camera patents forced the creation of Hollywood. Ben Persky explains why early filmmakers fled to California to avoid Edison's excruciating licensing costs. Full episode releasing tomorrow on X.

@pookiepolls There’s nothing immoral about an apartheid. White people need to protect themselves from violent Black people . we can help the world a lot more efficiently when we do not mix with them

A whole generation of South Africans would be shocked to read this, especially when they look at where the country is today. Before 1994, South Africa built capabilities that few countries in the world could claim. It developed nuclear weapons, a rocket programme, large-scale synthetic fuel production, a globally respected defence industry, and medical breakthroughs that made world history. At the southern tip of Africa, one country achieved all of this before the Cold War had even ended. Today, Africa is often spoken about as if it is still waiting to industrialise, still dependent, still trying to build what others already mastered long ago. That is what makes this history so striking. While South Africa was enriching uranium at Pelindaba, testing rockets at Overberg, producing fuel from coal at Secunda, and carrying out the world’s first human heart transplant at Groote Schuur, much of the rest of Africa was being pulled in a very different direction. Instead of industrial self-reliance, many newly independent states were sold ideology. Instead of building durable technical capacity, they were pushed toward socialist models that too often ended in weak institutions, dependency, and collapse. The pattern repeated itself across the continent. South Africa, by contrast, built real strategic capability under sanctions and international pressure. It developed its own uranium enrichment process, built six nuclear weapons, and then voluntarily dismantled them before the democratic transition, opening its programme to international inspection. No other nuclear state has done that in the same way. It also built a serious rocket programme. Vehicles in the RSA series were designed and tested, and the country came close to having its own orbital launch capability. That programme was not simply paused. It was dismantled. Sasol achieved something equally remarkable: turning coal into fuel on a huge scale. When South Africa could not secure enough oil, it used chemistry and engineering to produce its own supply. That was not theory. It was functioning industrial independence. The defence sector was another pillar of that capability. South Africa designed and produced advanced artillery, armoured vehicles, aircraft projects, and attack helicopters. Some of these systems went on to influence military designs far beyond its borders. Then there was medicine. In 1967, Christiaan Barnard and his team performed the world’s first successful human heart transplant in Cape Town. That was not an isolated achievement. It reflected a wider culture of scientific and medical excellence. So the uncomfortable question is this: if all of this is documented, why is so little of it widely remembered? The answer may be that it does not fit neatly into the version of history most people are taught. Pre-1994 South Africa is rightly remembered for apartheid and injustice, but that is not the whole story. It was also the most technologically advanced state Africa had produced, and acknowledging that forces people to confront how much capability existed, and how much has since been lost. South Africa did not inherit these achievements. It built them under pressure, under sanctions, and largely on its own. That is not nostalgia. It is history. And the fact that so many people barely know it happened says a great deal about how history is told.

@sentientist That was a great book. What happened to Gregory Cochran ?

@iosif_lazaridis @sentientist It’s about revolution speeding up 10,000 years ago, particularly in the area of behavior and cognitive ability, due to the discovery of grain and higher population that ensued

@sentientist Did The 10,000 Year Explosion predict that the intelligence PRS of early European farmers, before civilization in the traditional sense, was already basically at today’s level? That is much closer to what the paper shows than the story people are trying to project onto it.

@26ers_bp115 Send them all to Africa

アメリカ🇺🇸シカゴ ただ歩いているだけの白人男性を、 理由もなく後ろから殴りつけ、倒れた後も執拗に暴行する黒人達。 移民推進派はよく見ろ。 自分や身内が同じ目に遭わなきゃ気付かないのか？ いい加減、現実から目を逸らすのをやめろ。

@VDAREJamesK It’s just women voting

Theory: The Anglos can only exist as an empire and without it their inherent universalism devolves into self hatred. This includes America. Discuss.