BluntOP

1.3K posts

BluntOP banner
BluntOP

BluntOP

@BluntObserver

شامل ہوئے Aralık 2022
3 فالونگ15 فالوورز
BluntOP
BluntOP@BluntObserver·
@Mik7t @JoshuaMoonsault @chabster596556 @GameRoll_ @PopBase Holy shit, executing people in an indiscriminate manner is alright so long as it's not religious? Do you hear how brainwashed you are? Thousands of people were burned at an inquisition? Cite your sources. Don't start crying and dip.
English
1
0
2
33
Mik
Mik@Mik7t·
@BluntObserver @JoshuaMoonsault @chabster596556 @GameRoll_ @PopBase They did not execute for religious purposes. In fact, execution being phased out was a secular idea. “Only a tiny fraction were executed” yup just downplay thousands of people being burned at stakes. This is what schools need to teach. How delusional and disgusting you people are
English
1
0
0
26
Mik
Mik@Mik7t·
@BluntObserver @JoshuaMoonsault @chabster596556 @GameRoll_ @PopBase The church themselves recorded the inquisitions, the economic and intellectual stagnation during the most religious time period in Europe is well documented, who are you trying to gaslight, me or yourself? Because you aren’t gaslighting me.
English
2
0
0
53
BluntOP
BluntOP@BluntObserver·
@Mik7t @JoshuaMoonsault @chabster596556 @GameRoll_ @PopBase There is no such thing as the Dark Ages. That is a label invented by Protestant and non-religious anti-Catholic bigots like yourself. But if you want to read actual history, I recommend Bart Ehrman's 2026 book entitled Love Thy Stranger. Ehrman is a mainstream agnostic historian
BluntOP tweet mediaBluntOP tweet media
English
1
0
2
72
BluntOP
BluntOP@BluntObserver·
@sincityfrog @chabster596556 @GameRoll_ @PopBase The first abolitionists in history were Christian. The first person to explicitly denounce slavery as intrinsically immoral was a Christian, St. Gregory of Nyssa. Stop using leftist rhetoric to justify your bigotry against Christianity.
English
0
0
0
29
BluntOP
BluntOP@BluntObserver·
@JoshuaMoonsault @chabster596556 @GameRoll_ @PopBase It's a historical fact that Jesus and Christianity heavily shaped western morals and society. But let's just ignore all that and teach kids about depraved, leftist sexual ethics instead. 🙄
English
4
0
3
376
BluntOP
BluntOP@BluntObserver·
@seanpureDFS @CatRedFront We don’t believe that we can kill children. That’s typically what leftists and atheists do though. 😂
English
0
0
2
79
cam figton
cam figton@seanpureDFS·
@BluntObserver @CatRedFront 🤣🤣 so I didn’t misrepresent anything. you lost the second you defended your religion’s morality to kill children. Good luck bro
English
1
0
5
89
Camille ⚫
Camille ⚫@CatRedFront·
I don’t particularly dislike islam over other religions but honestly I rarely see christians claiming their religion is progressive or whatever nor do I regularly see leftists getting mad at others for calling christianity reactionary
English
38
117
3.2K
53K
BluntOP
BluntOP@BluntObserver·
@seanpureDFS @CatRedFront Uh huh. The flood was God’s judgement against evil, and is presented as a necessary action that God took to set humanity back on a course that makes their salvation and restoration to Paradise possible. It’s not relevant to human politics since we aren’t God. It’s a cheap shot.
English
1
0
0
84
cam figton
cam figton@seanpureDFS·
@BluntObserver @CatRedFront i've read both the bible & quran as well as have studied hinduism/buddhism/vipassana extensively. so ill ask again, what did i misrepresent in the great flood?
English
1
0
4
70
BluntOP
BluntOP@BluntObserver·
@seanpureDFS @CatRedFront So I’ll take that as a no, you don’t have anything substantive to say. No, I’m implying that you’re taking a passage in a book that you know nothing about to justify anti-religious bigotry and manipulation of politics.
English
1
0
0
63
cam figton
cam figton@seanpureDFS·
@BluntObserver @CatRedFront uneducated are the ones that believe in made up stories written 2000 years ago and have never questioned them their entire lives. Are you implying the great flood is a made up story?
English
2
0
7
83
BluntOP
BluntOP@BluntObserver·
@psilynt @thisissky0 @AgedReference @nocontextmemes matter the possible state of affairs, then that wrongness must apply to all possible people, even if they disagree. This is actually one way philosophers sometimes justify objective morality: reductio ad absurdem, or the absurdity of the contrary.
English
1
0
1
38
BluntOP
BluntOP@BluntObserver·
@psilynt @thisissky0 @AgedReference @nocontextmemes for fun is wrong depends on human so say, then it could be, and was for some people or societies, morally good. If you agree that genocide for fun is wrong no matter the possible state of affairs, then you agree with objective morality, for if genocide for fun is wrong no ...
English
1
0
1
40