Chilly Dog

@FFT1776 It seems that our leaders lack the will and incentive to secure our elections. Inquiring minds are asking why, but as usual the replies are just nonsense. One has to wonder just how deep the swamp is and who profits from the status-quo.

🚨Voting isn’t just a right. It’s a serious responsibility. The government has a duty to protect the integrity of every election. Each of us also has a responsibility. If your vote matters to you, then prove you’re eligible: ▸ Get your birth certificate ▸ Verify your citizenship ▸ Do the same due diligence you’d do for a driver’s license, a passport, marriage or anything else important in life. Legit voters have nothing to hide. PASS THE SAVE AMERICA ACT! What do you think? Drop your thoughts in the comments. I know I’m not the only one who feels this way. Let’s hear it!

@MichaelARothman What this genius doesn't realize is that once the socialists take over, they will have no use for these useful idiots. By then it will be too late for all of us.

𝐒𝐂𝐇𝐔𝐌𝐄𝐑 𝐖𝐀𝐑𝐍𝐒 𝐒𝐀𝐕𝐄 𝐀𝐂𝐓 𝐑𝐄𝐌𝐎𝐕𝐄𝐒 "𝟐𝟓 𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐋𝐈𝐎𝐍" 𝐅𝐑𝐎𝐌 𝐕𝐎𝐓𝐄𝐑 𝐑𝐎𝐋𝐋𝐒 — 𝐖𝐈𝐓𝐇𝐎𝐔𝐓 𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐙𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐖𝐇𝐀𝐓 𝐇𝐄 𝐉𝐔𝐒𝐓 𝐀𝐃𝐌𝐈𝐓𝐓𝐄𝐃 Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer went on camera this week to sound the alarm about the SAVE America Act — the bill that requires proof of citizenship to register to vote. He called it 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘵, 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪-𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘥𝘦𝘮𝘰𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵'𝘴 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥. But buried in his own warning is a number that conservatives should be framing in every ad, every debate, and every town hall from now until November. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘰𝘷𝘦 25 𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘰𝘧𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘴, Schumer said. He argued the bill's citizenship verification requirement — routed through the Department of Homeland Security rather than the Justice Department — would function as 𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘭𝘨𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘥𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘺𝘰𝘶'𝘳𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘺 [𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘥] 𝘵𝘰 𝘷𝘰𝘵𝘦 𝘰𝘳 𝘯𝘰𝘵. He predicted it could knock 𝟐𝟎 𝐭𝐨 𝟑𝟎 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞 off the rolls without notifying them. He warned that a voter who had cast ballots at the same precinct for years could show up and be turned away. Here is the question Schumer did not answer and apparently did not think to ask: why would proof of citizenship remove 25 million people? The SAVE Act does not remove eligible voters. It removes registrations that cannot be verified as belonging to citizens. If the bill eliminates 25 million registrations, that means 25 million registrations 𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐝𝐨𝐜𝐮𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩. Schumer presents this as the bill's flaw. Most Americans will read it differently. He also said he was a "lead plaintiff" in defeating an earlier version of the SAVE Act in court — a reminder that Democrats have actively litigated to block every effort to confirm that voters are who they say they are. Their argument has always been that these checks are unnecessary because voter fraud is rare. Now their Senate leader is warning on camera that one citizenship-verification bill could move 𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐫𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 off the rolls. The SAVE Act simply asks: are you a citizen? Schumer's answer is that 25 million people would rather not have to answer that. 𝐂𝐡𝐮𝐜𝐤 𝐒𝐜𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐞𝐫'𝐬 𝐩𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐜 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐀𝐕𝐄 𝐀𝐜𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐮𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐩𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐭.

@Nagel4Congress Until there is election reform in Minnesota, there will never be any Republican elected. The system is so jacked that an honest election is merely a mirage.

Accountability starts at the top. Governor you broke it. You won't fix it. The next honest Republican Governor will. We keep waiting for booking photos.

@GOP_is_Gutless Personally, I think we're on a hellbound train. There aren't many stops left between here and the destination they envision.

🚨 The 2026 Democrats have been fully hijacked by Communists. They like to call themselves “socialists,” but that’s just a softer name for the same stupid communism. As Ronald Brownstein reports: “The struggle over control of the Democratic Party’s direction has roared to new heights this year, with New York’s primary on Tuesday looming as the next major battlefield between left and center.” The radical left isn’t fighting the center — they’re winning. America is watching. When will sane Democrats wake up? What do you think? 👇 #DemocratCommunists #SocialismFails #NewYorkPrimary #AmericaFirst #RadicalLeft

@toni_g19 @Jamesjonesik8 Wouldn't matter if you did get caught. Nothing happens to crooks anymore.

@Jamesjonesik8 …

Four presidents. One historic reunion at the Obama Library. But one very noticeable absence. First time a sitting President was left out of a predecessor's library opening. Trump or not — what do YOU think?🤔

@Nagel4Congress If the election issues aren't dealt with before election day, one can bet we're in for more of the same.

Never again should Minnesota be subject to a tyrant.

@GOP_is_Gutless It's refreshing to see that there are some who have broken free and can see the damage inflicted on the blacks by the democrat party.

A Black woman just broke it down perfectly: “Black people can’t take responsibility for our own actions and decisions because that means no more free handouts, no more blaming White people when we fail.” They need racism as a crutch to avoid accountability. Hard truth. What do you think? 👇 #Accountability #RaceGrift #WakeUpAmerica

@FFT1776 And it's safe to say that America isn't out of the woods. The Senate REFUSES to pass the Save America Act which means elections will be stolen and the country we once had will be handed over to socialists.

Starmer’s cooked and he knows it 🔥 Left-wing governance always ends the same way: economic disaster, open borders, broken promises, and voters finally saying “enough.” Even his own party is turning on him now. Britain rejected it. America already did. Pack it up, Keir. The people have spoken. Who’s next?

@nunyabizness555 There is pressure building in the trenches where those of us trying to live an honest life and help our less fortunate are increasing aware that we are being fleeced. I feel this is nearing a breaking point and will not end well for those doing the fleecing.

This should ENRAGE EVERY AMERICAN! We’re TAXED into NEAR SERVITUDE just for our tax dollars to go to CORRUPT politicians, other countries, able bodied/REFUSING TO WORK welfare parasites & INVADING ILLEGALS! Americans went to war once b4 over taxes(and WON)we can do it again!

@RYboating When your house is on fire, you need water, not more matches!

Starmer on the Brink as Pressure Builds to Resign and Make Way for Burnham Replacing Starmer with another Labour Party member, doesn't sound like the fix the UK needs at all! 🙄 I wish the land of my ancestors would wake up and send all the trouble-making foreigners back to where they came from. Trading one leftist leader for another, won't help with the problems they are facing- at all, IMO. From the article: LONDON (AP) – British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is facing a career-defining decision: step down or fight a challenge from Labour Party rival Andy Burnham. Starmer has publicly vowed to stay in post, but pressure is building as more and more Labour Party colleagues conclude his time is up. Expectation is growing that he will announce a timetable for his resignation as soon as Monday. That´s the day Burnham will be sworn in as a lawmaker in the House of Commons after winning a special election last week. Business Secretary Peter Kyle said Sunday that Starmer is “making time to reflect on the political realities, challenges and opportunities that he finds himself in.” “I know he is a prime minister who always puts his country first,” Kyle told the BBC, though he said reports that Starmer will resign are “speculation.” If Starmer quits, he will be the sixth prime minister to leave office in the past 10 years, an extraordinary rate of churn for the United Kingdom. Labour is losing liberal voters to the growing Green Party and facing a rising Reform UK, the Nigel Farage -led anti-immigration party that consistently leads in nationwide opinion polls. Burnham, until this week the popular mayor of Greater Manchester, decisively won the seat of Makerfield in northwestern England in a special election held Thursday. He took almost 55% of the 45,510 votes cast, over 9,000 more than the Reform UK runner-up. Now that he is a lawmaker, he’s in a position to challenge Starmer for leadership of the Labour Party. Burnham’s acceptance speech left no doubt that he wants to lead both the party and the country. “Everyone knows that politics isn’t working,” he said. “Everyone can feel that the country isn’t where it should be. Tonight could, just could, be the turning point.” It’s unclear whether Burnham would face a coronation or a challenge if Starmer steps aside. Wes Streeting, who resigned as health secretary last month to protest Starmer’s leadership, has said he will run in a contest if there is one. Starmer congratulated Burnham on Friday, but insisted he would fight any attempt to oust him. “I will run, I will stand,” if there is a Labour leadership contest, Starmer said. “I’ve said repeatedly I’m not going to walk away from that.” But Charlie Falconer, a senior Labour member of the House of Lords, said Saturday that Starmer has “absolutely no authority” left. “There should be an agreed transition process in which Andy and Keir cooperate as to when the handover should take place,” he told the BBC. Link to article in comments

@BskiMike22802 @realphilhendrie @TJH314 Your articles are some of the most informative and often entertaining reading on X. I am surprised at how often I have discovered either new information or a deeper understanding of topics I thought I was pretty clear on.

@realphilhendrie @TJH314 I have over 100 articles I have published on X. How about taking a look? You will see that I have a larger vocabulary than swear words.

Let me ruin your June for a second. Every year when National Gun Violence Awareness Month rolls around, the same people who have not read a single page of John Lott's 13,312-regression peer-reviewed study start posting pictures of children and demanding you feel responsible for deaths you did not cause and had nothing to do with. So. Let us talk about children. Since they brought it up. In 2006, the CDC recorded 642 accidental firearm deaths in the entire United States. For children under the age of ten — the number was 31. Thirteen under age five. Eighteen between five and nine. Tragic? Absolutely. Every single one. But here is the number that will not appear on a single "Orange Friday" awareness post: 80. Eighty children under the age of five drown in bathtubs every year. Every. Single. Year. ALMOST THREE TIMES as many children drown in bathtubs annually as die from ALL firearm accidents combined — including adults. And forty more drown in five-gallon water buckets. The kind you buy at Home Depot for $4.99. I have given this information at talks and watched jaws drop, because people genuinely believe the number is in the thousands. They have been so thoroughly marinated in "gun violence awareness" content that their perception of actual risk is completely detached from reality. That is not an accident. That is the point of the campaign. Where is Bathtub Awareness Month? Where is the congressional hearing on five-gallon bucket control? Where is the hashtag? Where are the orange ribbons for the children who drowned while their parents were in the next room? There are none. Because the campaign was never about children. It was never about safety. If it were about safety, they would be equally outraged about cars — which killed 1,305 children that same year. Or fire. Or drowning. But they are not. The selective fury lands exclusively on firearms. And if you are a scientist, which I happen to be, you do not get to cherry-pick your data based on which conclusion you prefer. Quinn's Law Number Six: facts are the enemy of liberalism. Now let us talk about what the actual data says about guns and safety, because John Lott ran 13,000-plus statistical regressions across every county in America and the results are not ambiguous. Fifty-six percent of convicted felons surveyed in a ten-state study said they would NOT attack a target they believed was armed. Fifty-six percent. The deterrence is real, it is documented, and it functions whether or not a shot is ever fired. The firearm you carry protects your neighbor whether your neighbor knows it or not. When states passed right-to-carry laws, multiple-victim public shootings — what the media insists on calling "mass shootings" to maximize terror — dropped by 67 percent. Deaths in those events dropped by 75 percent. Injuries by 81 percent. States that adopted these laws virtually ELIMINATED mass public shootings within four to five years. The remaining events? They happened almost exclusively in the specific locations where guns remained banned. The gun-free zones. The places we hang the sign that only the law-abiding ever read. There were between 760,000 and 3.6 million defensive gun uses in the United States last year alone, depending on which of fifteen national polls you consult. A JAMA Network Open study from March 2025 estimated 489,000 DGUs in which a firearm was actually discharged. The Department of Justice's own National Crime Victimization Survey puts the conservative floor at 65,000 defensive uses per year against assaults, robberies, and home invasions. No dead body. No coverage. No awareness month. Here is one more number for you: 74. Seventy-four percent of convicted felons in a National Institute of Justice survey said they actively avoided homes they believed were occupied by armed residents. Criminals respond to incentives. That is not ideology — that is basic deterrence theory, and it is confirmed by the people who actually commit the crimes. I also want you to think carefully about something the Supreme Court already settled. DeShaney v. Winnebago County (1989). Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales (2005). Two separate rulings establishing that the government has NO legal obligation to protect you as an individual. None. You are your own first responder. That is not my opinion — that is settled constitutional law from the highest court in this country. So the political class that just told you the government is not required to protect you... is also the one demanding you surrender the tool you use to protect yourself. I want fewer people dead. That is why I know the data. That is why I read the book. That is why I am furious every June when emotion and fundraising replace science and evidence in a "debate" that has actual life-or-death consequences for real people. You want to honor the children? Honor ALL of them. The ones who drowned. The ones who died in car crashes. And the ones who will never be born because a woman alone in her house at 2 a.m. had no way to stop what was coming through her door. But what do I know — I am only a published textbook author, a science teacher, a father of four, and a combat medic who spent his career reducing human suffering and who actually read the peer-reviewed data before forming an opinion. IF you agree: LIKE this post so the algorithm shows it to people who need to read it. SHARE this. COMMENT below — did you know the bathtub number? Or did the narrative keep that from you? Tell me. And if you want MORE of this -- the data, the history, the science, the stories -- JOIN Bski's Classroom community on X or YouTube. #MAGA #Veterans #Trump @JoJoFromJerz @GuntherEagleman @catturd2

@bluelivesmtr Good for her. It's about time someone calls out the madness. I hope she doesn't end up on a hit list as that seems to be what happens to those who don't play along.

Absolutely LOVE this. REP. Harriet Hageman is spitting fire and dropping facts: “Cisgender is a MADE-UP word. It means NOTHING. Do NOT call me cisgender. I am a woman.” “All you need to determine s*x is a cheek swab. XX or XY. Boy or girl. IT’S THAT SIMPLE.” This woman's message needs to go EVERYWHERE! #lawenforcement

@Tironianae The people of Minnesota didn't elect the crap government that we're forced to live with. Our elections have been suspect for decades. The problem is much like the problem with federal elections. The people needed to enact changes won't because the current system benefits them.

🚨 BREAKING: Scott Presler just exposed a DISGUSTING loophole in Minnesota’s voting system. One person can “VOUCH” for 8 migrants to vote with SAME DAY registration. No proof of residency. No voter ID. ZERO verification. In 2024 alone, 296,000 same day registrations. And if you work at a residential facility? There is NO LIMIT to how many “residents” you can vouch for. This isn’t democracy. It’s engineered fraud. REPEAL THIS NOW.

@CreasonJana @TruthGuardianQ This is how D.C. works. Everybody "misappropriates" and covers for each other when the heat is on. We have been and are continuing to be fleeced by those who are supposed to be taking care of the people's business.

Fascinating post by @TruthGuardianQ. This does not surprise me … the depths the Obama’s will go to for wealth. Just like Barack receiving a Nobel Peace Prize for doing ABSOLUTELY NOTHING … he is now receiving millions annually for doing absolutely nothing. It’s so frustrating to see people who hear and see the truth but can’t receive it! Obama was a Manchurian President!

@MichaelARothman He's apparently taken a page from Hillary's playbook. Deny, deflect and delay. When all else fails, the standard reply is "I don't recall". But we all now see that this was either incompetence or collusion. Neither suggests reelection is a good idea.

𝐊𝐄𝐈𝐓𝐇 𝐄𝐋𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐎𝐍 𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐌𝐒 𝐎𝐅𝐅 𝐖𝐇𝐄𝐍 𝐀𝐒𝐊𝐄𝐃 𝐀𝐁𝐎𝐔𝐓 $𝟗 𝐁𝐈𝐋𝐋𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐍𝐄𝐒𝐎𝐓𝐀 𝐌𝐄𝐃𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐈𝐃 𝐅𝐑𝐀𝐔𝐃 𝐓𝐇𝐀𝐓 𝐇𝐀𝐏𝐏𝐄𝐍𝐄𝐃 𝐎𝐍 𝐇𝐈𝐒 𝐖𝐀𝐓𝐂𝐇 Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison walked out on a reporter who asked him to account for the scale of Medicaid fraud that occurred — and was allegedly covered up — under his and Governor Tim Walz’s watch. The scope of what the House Oversight Committee uncovered is staggering: up to $𝟗 𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧 was stolen from 14 different Minnesota Medicaid programs, with evidence suggesting Ellison and Walz had been warned about credible fraud concerns as early as 2019. When a reporter pressed Ellison for a forensic accounting of the fraud figures, his response said everything. Instead of addressing the numbers, he tried to redirect blame: “𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘯𝘶𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘦𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘢 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘶𝘢𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘛𝘳𝘶𝘮𝘱 𝘢𝘥𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯.” He was blaming Trump supporters for a fraud scandal that exploded under Democrat governance. Then he added: “𝘚𝘰 𝘐’𝘮 𝘥𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘺𝘰𝘶. 𝘉𝘺𝘦-𝘣𝘺𝘦.” And walked. The House Oversight Committee laid out what Ellison and Walz actually knew. By April 2020, both had received direct warnings about Department of Education fraud. By 2019, credible concerns had been raised at the Department of Human Services. Rather than act, the committee found they 𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰𝐥𝐞𝐝𝐠𝐞 and actively 𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐥𝐞𝐛𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐬 who tried to bring the fraud to light. Senator Josh Hawley has since called for Ellison to be indicted. The committee’s formal report uses the words “incompetence” and “willful blindness.” Ellison’s on-camera strategy when confronted with the numbers: blame Trump, then walk. The reporter barely flinched — simply said he’d report that Ellison called the figures wrong. Ellison’s exit confirmed nothing and explained nothing — which is, in its own way, an answer to every question about what he knew and when. 𝐔𝐩 𝐭𝐨 $𝟗 𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐧. 𝐄𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐛𝐥𝐚𝐦𝐞𝐝 𝐓𝐫𝐮𝐦𝐩 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐰𝐚𝐥𝐤𝐞𝐝.

@GOP_is_Gutless You can bet your sweet a$$ it would matter if the "undocumented" were voting Republican. Dems would be rounding them up and shipping them out!

Democrats just admitted the quiet part out loud again. Democrat Rep. Ro Khanna on non-citizen voting: “It’s not an issue that you have undocumented people in mass numbers voting.” This is precisely why they’re desperately fighting the SAVE America Act — which simply requires proof of U.S. citizenship to vote. Close elections are decided by a few hundred or thousand votes. Mass illegal voting isn’t a glitch — it’s outright election theft. We demand nationwide Voter ID and real safeguards NOW. No more gaslighting the American people. What do you think? 👇 #ElectionIntegrity #SAVEAct #VoterID #SecureElections #NoIllegalsVoting

@keithellison Know what else is worth saving? Election integrity and immigration laws. Both of these limit the probability of Keith getting reelected.

Juneteenth is a reminder that freedom is worth celebrating, and worth protecting. Today is about coming together in community, honoring the generations who never stopped believing in a better future, and celebrating the joy, resilience, and contributions of Black Minnesotans. Grateful to celebrate with friends, neighbors, and community today at Rondo and Southside. Happy Juneteenth!

@AVGirl4Life At least he's telling us - Hillary on the other hand says one thing, does another and then "doesn't recall" when pressed by congress.

What will Hillary Clinton be remembered for?

We often hear about these Democrat "gifts" individually. Once again you have packaged them up nicely with receipts. This article is another good one to bookmark for future reference! Thanks Mike!

@MichaelARothman Recently read that 69.42% of all statistics stated on X are made up on the spot. Guessing this applies to Rosie.

𝐑𝐎𝐒𝐈𝐄 𝐎’𝐃𝐎𝐍𝐍𝐄𝐋𝐋 𝐂𝐋𝐀𝐈𝐌𝐒 𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐌𝐏 𝐕𝐈𝐒𝐈𝐓𝐄𝐃 𝐄𝐏𝐒𝐓𝐄𝐈𝐍 𝐈𝐒𝐋𝐀𝐍𝐃 “𝟑𝟎𝟎 𝐓𝐈𝐌𝐄𝐒” — 𝐖𝐈𝐓𝐇 𝐙𝐄𝐑𝐎 𝐄𝐕𝐈𝐃𝐄𝐍𝐂𝐄 Rosie O’Donnell is not adjusting well to the Trump era. Living abroad and newly returned to social media, she made one of the most unhinged public allegations against a sitting president in recent memory — and made it without a shred of supporting evidence. In a recent clip, O’Donnell went further than any mainstream commentator: “𝘏𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘣𝘦 𝘱𝘶𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘮𝘦𝘯 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘴𝘴 𝘳∗𝘱𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘨 𝘨𝘪𝘳𝘭𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘣𝘰𝘺𝘴.” Then she added her number: “𝘏𝘦 𝘸𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 300 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘴.” No source. No named witness. No legal filing. No law enforcement agency has investigated or accused Trump of anything related to Epstein’s crimes. No victim has named him. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 “𝟑𝟎𝟎 𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐬” 𝐟𝐢𝐠𝐮𝐫𝐞 exists solely in O’Donnell’s assertion — she provided nothing to support it. What the public record shows: Trump’s name appears in early 1990s Epstein flight logs, before any criminal investigation existed. He has stated he threw Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago for harassing a staff member’s daughter. Trump has not been named in any Epstein-related criminal complaint or proceeding. No prosecutor has pursued a case against him. O’Donnell made this claim while Trump had been pursuing legal action related to her citizenship status. It lands as what it is: a 𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐤 from someone who has made Trump her entire personality for nearly a decade, now reaching for a number she cannot document. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐩𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐢𝐧 𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐬𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐲 𝐓𝐫𝐮𝐦𝐩. 𝐖𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐝𝐢𝐝𝐧’𝐭 𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐠𝐨𝐨𝐝𝐬, 𝐑𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐞 𝐎’𝐃𝐨𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐥𝐥 𝐝𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐢𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐟.