EndTimesEnjoyer

3.7K posts

EndTimesEnjoyer

EndTimesEnjoyer

@CurrentlyStuffx

شامل ہوئے Ocak 2026
201 فالونگ6 فالوورز
EndTimesEnjoyer
EndTimesEnjoyer@CurrentlyStuffx·
@FuckedUpYogis I het he's exploring options to stash away his ill-gotten wealth from uae to portugal... ain't nothing to do with soh
English
0
0
0
9
People’s Commissar
People’s Commissar@faisal_parla·
Oman is on a curious- some would say brave - journey.
English
2
1
11
696
Richard Hanania
Richard Hanania@RichardHanania·
I naturally have fascist instincts, but I can't be a fascist because I am too smart and intellectually honest. Aesthetically, I love hierarchy, tradition, etc. But every non-liberal thinker is embarrassingly bad. There's no honest alternative.
Richard Hanania tweet media
English
106
31
505
122.3K
EndTimesEnjoyer ری ٹویٹ کیا
Michael Tracey
Michael Tracey@mtracey·
SEE THIS CUTE BUNNY? HE FUCKIN' DIES IF YOU DON'T OPEN THE FUCKIN' STRAIT
Michael Tracey tweet media
English
238
2.6K
29.8K
919K
EndTimesEnjoyer ری ٹویٹ کیا
Indian Muslim Archives
I find the whole Indian (Hindu radical & liberal both) historiography a scam, marked by double standards and flawed terminology. Unfortunately, the incompetence of Indian Muslim historiographers let this flourish. For example: their framing of native and foreigner. Let me elaborate this. The Hindus are not a single biological race, nor even a coherent cluster. Across history, conquest and assimilation have played a decisive role in the spread of Vedic-based traditions. Even without going into the Aryan age, relatively recent examples make this clear: groups like the Hunas and Sakas were absorbed and Hinduised, and their descendants live among us today. The Ahom conquers of Assam too (originally Chinese) later integrated and are now celebrated within Hindu discourse as a group triumphant against Islamic hegemony. This is not an issue in itself. It becomes one when the same framework is selectively used to judge Indian Muslim history. The categories of "foreign" and "native," as deployed in Hindu-centric narratives, are inconsistent and inapplicable to Indian Muslims. The issue with Hindu historiography lies in its tendency to equate Indianness with the Vedic or Puranic sphere. This is flawed. Large sections of medieval India, particularly animist communities, existed entirely outside these traditions. If anything, Puranic traditions often absorbed elements from them, not the other way around. Were they not Indians? Hindus refer to their country as Bharat, a name derived from the Bharata tribe, from which the term "Bharatavarsha" is said to have emerged after their triumph over various other tribes of the Indian subcontinent. The question, then, is - how is a name rooted in conquest and subjugation applied to all Indians? Are all Hindus (or Indians) descendants of the Bharata clan? Of course not. On the contrary, the Indian Muslim worldview regards Adam (god's blessings be upon him) to have landed in India, a thing well recorded by Ibn Ishaq (704-768), the first biographer of the Prophet, and At-Tabari (839-923) with hadiths with chains going back to the days of Prophet. Unlike Hindus, the Indian Muslim perspectives regard India as a primordial homeland of humanity and situate identity within a distinct process of community formation. This process began to take shape in the late 18th century, accelerated after 1835, and consolidated over the following century. During this time, the Hindustani Muslim identity (once largely confined to the Ganges plain) expanded and absorbed regional distinctions. This was similar to how the Farsi (Persian) identity, once limited to the small region of Fars in Iran, expanded across large parts of the Middle East and Central Asia. Take the example of Sultan Qutubuddin Aibak. He, from an Indian Muslim perspective, is not foreigner, but foundational to the Indian Muslim historical continuity. He is their first major political patriarch. His legacy is embedded within the community, not external to it and no community on earth can claim him, except them. This is the failure of Indian Muslim historiography to clearly define its own process of community formation, which led not just the Hindus but foreigner Muslims (eg: Iranians, Rumelians and Anatolians, and Central Asians) to claim the Indian Muslim Heritage and history. When every major society acadmeicall articulated their historical evolution and community formation, Indian Muslims still lack a an academically enforced narrative of community formation and definition. Therefore, there is a clear need to separate Indian Muslim historiography from Hindu-centric frameworks, and to develop an independent approach rooted in its own historical experience, categories, and continuity.
Lost Temples™@LostTemple7

Tell me the biggest scam in Indian history ?

English
44
57
327
25.1K
EndTimesEnjoyer
EndTimesEnjoyer@CurrentlyStuffx·
@hashurtag They would have traded it for complete sanctions relief but then US attacked cuz Trump won't give them sanctions relief. Now they have enriched uranium and control over SOH which makes the option of sanctions relief less appealing
English
0
0
0
12
Shahab
Shahab@hashurtag·
The problem - and no one has been able to explain this problem - is that why is Iran hanging onto 60% enriched uranium? What is this mad game of Russian Roulette with fissile material? Either make the damn bomb or just give it up. Why are you using this to blackmail others?
Muh@MuhA17197083

@hashurtag I think public pressure is building on them too, to not give it up, after attacks. I wouldn't be surprised if they will accelerate this to achieve capability to stop war.

English
6
2
12
1.8K
Bethany S. Mandel
Bethany S. Mandel@bethanyshondark·
Personally I wouldn’t take smiling photos with a woman who spent the last six months terrorizing a widow 🙃
Bethany S. Mandel tweet media
English
2.5K
461
8.5K
789.6K
EndTimesEnjoyer ری ٹویٹ کیا
Eric Michael Garcia
Eric Michael Garcia@EricMGarcia·
My Cat: Open the Fuckin’ Wet Food, you crazy bastard, or you’ll be living in Hell - JUST WATCH! Praise be to Allah.
English
201
3.6K
44.5K
1M
EndTimesEnjoyer ری ٹویٹ کیا
Richard Strocher 𝕏
Richard Strocher 𝕏@RichardStrocher·
MR. GORBACHEV TEAR DOWN THIS FUCKIN' WALL YOU CRAZY BASTARD OR YOU'LL BE LIVING IN HELL. PRAISE BE TO ALLAH!
Richard Strocher 𝕏 tweet media
English
110
2.3K
41K
817.3K
Shahab
Shahab@hashurtag·
Crazy. Yasir is just losing it. Can you please stay away from excessive political commentary? These are terrible takes and not grounded in facts but pure Indian propaganda. More Biharis were brutalized by Mukti Bahini than Bengaldeshis were at the hands of Pak army. Moreover, Biharis continue to be oppressed in Bangladesh even today stripped of all rights. Smitten by this silly Iranophilic disease, you will run with anything to please Daniel and crew.
Muhammad Yasir Al-Hanafi@YasirAlHanafi

@MuslimSkepticHQ @Haqiqatjou As a Pakistani, I cannot deny the atrocities committed by the Pakistani army, especially against our Bangladeshi brothers and sisters in the 1970s. It was horrific. This argument would imply that Israel should be accorded precedence over Pakistan, which is, of course, absurd.

English
8
20
96
4.3K