Experience

Werewolves of Austin.

Check this shit out, if you’ve been paying real close attention to this UAP circus since 2017, you start seeing the same little bunch of names orbiting every “big its coming” moment. Lacatski. Davis. Elizondo. Puthoff. These aren’t brave insiders who got tired of secrecy and wandered into the light. These are the same dudes who ran programs, held clearances, wrote the papers, worked the contracts, moved through the intelligence world, and now somehow keep giving us just enough goodies to stay hooked, but never enough to settle anything. Look, I've been at this since the 90s .. same shit. Lacatski wasn’t some guy reading UFO reports in a basement. He was tied directly into AAWSAP/BAASS and the Skinwalker/Bigelow world, where secrecy is baked into the whole thing. Then years later, he’s casually dropping shit about craft of unknown origin and reverse-engineering possibilities and gaining access to the interior. Come on Mf'ers. The system that hid the projects for decades doesn’t let the program people wander into public and spill shit unless there is a reason for it. Then you’ve got Eric Davis, Puthoff’s longtime physics guy, AAWSAP contractor, DIRD paper writer, Wilson Davis memo figure, and one of the big time voices keeping the crash retrieval story alive and still never truly killing it or proving it. Umm hmm. That is the whole BS game. Nothing ever happens. I know I'll hear .. "oh Jason .. the hearings" ... but what was gained. Shit. Nothing dies. It just floats there forever, pulling people deeper into the maze. Add BS Elizondo, the Pentagon counter intel officer who either ran AATIP or didn’t depending on which official wording you believe! Puthoff, with his long CIA remote viewing/paranormal history, and what do you have? A super super super closed loop. The public asks for craft, bodies, contractors, paper trails, names, and receipts, and suddenly the conversation drifts into consciousness, portals, hitchhiker effects, dimensions, and “it’s too weird for your little brain.” F all you tards. That’s not disclosure. That’s pure management. I know what it is .. I've been married twice. A limited ha ha BS hangout with better lighting.

🧵 1/ There is a growing public conversation around whether UAP whistleblowers need “amnesty” before they can tell Congress what they know. That framing is understandable, but incomplete. The real issue is not whether Congress is legally allowed to receive classified information. It is. The harder issue is how witnesses and whistleblowers can responsibly provide that information while reducing the very real risks of retaliation. That distinction is at the center of our policy brief on disclosure of classified UAP information to Congress. Hunt Willis, Chief Legal Officer of the Disclosure Foundation, explains why classification cannot be used as a blanket shield against congressional oversight.