Firstname Lastname☭
1.3K posts


@femboyliberty It is a full on blockade that isolates the country from critical basic resources like Oil which cannot be produced within the country. This illegal starvation has gone on for more than sixty years.
English

@Kingcats87 @iblees_ki_aulad Are you gullible enough to think the ISI would publish their intelligence reports or cooperation agreements publicly?
English

@Firstname_real @iblees_ki_aulad 'Clearly proven' then cite the exact verified report that shows Pakistani intelligence actively directing those attacks. So far you’ve just repeated the claim, not proven it.
English

No pakistani nationalist has any right to say shit aboit iran or gaza if yall cant condemn this
Yall have no moral ground to fuckign stand on
✦✦✦ 𝙿𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚑𝚕𝚎𝚝𝚜 ✦✦✦@PamphletsY
🚨🇵🇰 BREAKING — Pakistan Airstrike Hits Kabul; 200 Dead, 170 Injured.
English

@coffeededo_o What the fuck is that grammar
I had a stroke reading this
English

@eshaLegal Essentially you're saying that we should all be uneducated conservatives untouched by Communist proopaganda
English

The accidental communism argument

Pop Base@PopBase
Twitter turns 20. What is your favorite tweet of all time?
English

@21InternationAL @ACPMain Revisionist collaborationist right wing losers
I'd rather be a Social Democrat then join the ACP
English

You're politically homeless? You don't have to be. Join @ACPMain

ThePatrioticBlonde🇺🇸@ImBreckWorsham
I’m politically homeless. War mongers to the left of me. Pedophiles to the right. I've spent my entire adult career covering politics. I always believed I was on side of the good guys. It hurts......There were none.
English

@Kingcats87 @iblees_ki_aulad It is clearly verified and proven that the militants operate on Pakistani soil and use Pakistani intelligence to commit terrorist attacks
English

@Firstname_real @iblees_ki_aulad A fact is something clearly verified and directly proven not something inferred or assumed. You’ve shown that these groups exist, but you haven’t proven the specific claim that the Pakistani state sponsors them. That leap is your assumption.
English

@HotSotin *Laughs in resource and labour exploitation from the third world*
English

@WhiteHouse Reminds me of a certain George Orwell book
English

@ConspiracyBull1 America had already begun to self destruct when Trump became president
English

@JohnBurg1917 ACP is a joke
Join any other communist party
Hell even the liberals are more left wing
English

@hamburgwrrr @OG_Murshid The wild boar hit F16 during takeoff
IAF hit it before it could even leave the hangar

English

@Firstname_real @OG_Murshid Who will score a hit on F16? IAF or a wild boar?? You are right a wild boar is more competent than 1.5 people Air Force 😂
English

@Kingcats87 @iblees_ki_aulad I'm using yours, not mine
English

@Firstname_real @iblees_ki_aulad That’s a false dilemma. You’re pretending there are only two options when reality is far more complex. Inability to fully eliminate militancy doesn’t equal support otherwise half the world would be state sponsors by your logic
English

@Kingcats87 @iblees_ki_aulad Lmao why are you calling literal facts "assumptions"?
What would you define as a fact?
English

@Firstname_real @iblees_ki_aulad Calling me myopic doesn’t magically turn your assumptions into proof. You still haven’t shown actual evidence.
English

@kaskaide1 Zero proof
Full larp
Pakistan social media army
English

@nasdaily Washed up scam youtuber goes to heavily blockaded and sanctioned country actively illegally being starved to death and prefers the side that has been starving it to death for 60 years
No wonder people don't like you
English

@CENTCOM None were shot down, the jets all had laundry room fires and unrelated medical conditions
English

@Kingcats87 @iblees_ki_aulad Not my fault you're too myopic to look at the concrete right in front of you
English

@Firstname_real @iblees_ki_aulad Repeating UN, article sources isn’t the same as actually citing them.If your case was that strong you’d point to a specifi report proving state sponsorship not just keep name dropping Youre backed by vague claims I’m asking for one concrete proof and you still can’t provide it
English

@Kingcats87 @iblees_ki_aulad By your definition then, Pakistan is either
Unable to eliminate terrorist groups operating in its own territory
Or
Pakistan doesn't care because it believes the destabilization of India benefits it
First one means Pakistan is weak and incompetent
Second equals state sponsorship
English

@Firstname_real @iblees_ki_aulad You just made up your own definition. State sponsorship means active support, not inability or failure to eliminate a group. Those are completely different things
English


















