Fur5

1.3K posts

Fur5 banner
Fur5

Fur5

@Fur5658

Amateur philosopher. Pentester for vulnerable networks. Love animal fur. Not a furry.

Los Angeles, CA شامل ہوئے Mart 2019
1K فالونگ120 فالوورز
Fur5
Fur5@Fur5658·
Highly understandable. I agree with what you said. Mainly due to because of the many policies that the U.S. Government has essentially made the idea of marriage largely difficult for anyone young to achieve in the first place. But if we want to fix the part where the white women sleep around with other races, there must also be a cultural shift around the new policies that will allow that to happen. It's not wrong to think that people should be with their own kind. Demographically speaking, along with the things that the Civil Rights Act has created this Victimhood mindset that Whites are the problem. They aren't the problem but they were made as such. What's funny is that any nation that is not Western Europe or the United States is frowned upon for wanting to protect their own borders, yet a blind eye is turned towards nations that aren't important as these first world nations.
English
0
0
2
14
Richard Arion
Richard Arion@RichardArion1·
Point of reflection Racial segregation and anti-miscegenation laws with one drop rule in states in and OUT of the South, especially Louisiana, Illinois, Tennessee, Mississippi, Virginia, Texas went too far BUT the Civil Rights and Hart Celler Acts were mistakes. I think freedom of association is sacred and the CRA enslaves business owners. Many if not most Hart Celler immigrants post 1986-1990 have immigrated in extremely bad faith, essentially colonizing America. As much as I think people should have freedom to marry whoever they want, close to 50% if not 60% of sexually active Gen Z White women have had sexual relationships with either blacks or hispanics. Those stats are mainly about casual sex but If White women procreate outside of their race there won’t be White people anymore. My proposal is to craft a constitutional amendment that will defend free will, privacy and freedom of association under such a language as to outlaw both the intrusion of the Civil Rights and forced segregation laws. The best course of action is to defend the freedom of others. Americans should not be ruled by either foreigners outvoting them or ties to their own bloodline and race.
English
8
3
8
319
Fur5
Fur5@Fur5658·
@RichardArion1 Yeah this list sounds like something I would agree with.
English
0
0
1
4
Richard Arion
Richard Arion@RichardArion1·
6 and 7. Reindustrialize America to then ban Chinese students 8. End college Title IX courts 9. Deploy the military for TENS OF MILLIONS of deportations of illegals 10. Repeal the 14th amendment. 11. Repeal the 19th amendment. 12. Repeal the patriot act and the national security act of 1947 13. End the fed 14. Repeal the civil rights act 15. Constitutional amendments to restore presumption of innocence to the justice system and end cause and prejudice 16. Denaturalize far left anchor babies and naturalized citizens 17. Outlaw communism with a constitutional amendment impossible to circumvent
Eric Schmitt@Eric_Schmitt

Five-Step Plan to Restore American Sovereignty: 1. Pass the SAVE America Act 2. Millions of Deportations 3. Noncitizens Out of the Apportionment 4. End Sanctuary Cities 5. Stop the replacement of American Workers What else should be on the list: Birthright Citizenship? NGOs?

English
13
9
56
2.6K
Fur5
Fur5@Fur5658·
I think we'll just end the discussion from here. Because reading your other replies to someone here in the thread. It tells me that you're not willing to have a open minded discussion, since you keep assuming anyone that is a lolicon or consumes loli content is an automatic pedophile. Moreso that you actively pursue the idea of locking up all lolicons. Since it appears you do not care about Freedom of Speech, assuming that they're the greatest evil. Again you don't have to like the content, but there's no hiding that you don't like anyone that isn't of your worldview. I've made it pretty clear on my stances about lolicons, and if you keep implying they're pedophiles even with what I've stated, then there's no point in talking to you anymore.
English
0
0
0
11
Chad
Chad@puppywhistle69·
@Fur5658 @ChibiReviews “Most of them don’t hurt real children” how do you even know this? And I’m sure if a person views loli porn significantly increases the chances of they will.
English
1
0
0
39
Chibi Reviews
Chibi Reviews@ChibiReviews·
A day later I get swatted after he said this btw Not a very good look.
Chibi Reviews tweet media
English
114
280
3.7K
60.7K
Fur5
Fur5@Fur5658·
To put it bluntly. That is something that will exist, If it's AI Generated then it's implied it's using an Open Source LLM Model, Where the people that have actual cp material will use that to train the model to generate more of that. The problem being is who would be the one distributing it. You can't ban the original model since it was Open Source in the first place, but probably the one that was trained with cp material is the illegal one that they'll be after. Let's say that closed source models had them already. The question in being is who is to blame? Because if you're asking my opinion about that. It's a very complicated issue, but if they want to do harm with said material, then there's consequences for. But if this has to do with lolicons, let me remind you. Most of them don't hurt real children. If you want to help the children that are victims of it. Then help out law enforcement to try and find those that are the ones spreading it. I'm not sure why'd you wanted to argue that since the original point was about lolicons, not about AI generated cp, but you have your answer.
English
1
0
1
42
PK Patchworks
PK Patchworks@PKPatchworks·
Got called a larper at the range earlier lads
English
46
2
701
11.7K
Fur5
Fur5@Fur5658·
I'm aware it came from a novel called Lolita and the contents of said novel is suggestive, but my point stands. Even if it came from something that is controversial today, I am talking about the average lolicon, the one's that tend to consume it. They aren't pedophiles and to suspend their accounts for such accusations is something I don't approve. They don't hurt real children and the ones that do are outliers, exceptions but they aren't the majority that represent lolicons as a whole.
English
0
0
0
10
Fur5
Fur5@Fur5658·
With that point of view. That is essentially against Freedom of Speech, if you do not see it as a speech issue, but you assume anyone that consumes it sick or immoral that either they get help or lock up considering your earlier comments is inherently against Free Speech. This is similar rhetoric that is actively being used to create mass surveillance with Digital ID and Age Verification. If you do not understand what is at stake. Then agree to disagree, because I'm not going to tell you to like something or not. Something that unfortunately you think is fine by wanting lolicons locked up. Understand that this mindset you have is going to lead to mass surveillance and the consequences that come with it because that's what big tech and governments want. Don't say I didn't warn you.
English
2
0
2
40
Chad
Chad@puppywhistle69·
@Fur5658 @ChibiReviews I don’t see it as a freedom of speech issue. And even if it should be legal technically I still think literally everyone who consumes it is sick and should get treatment
English
1
0
0
33
Fur5
Fur5@Fur5658·
Once again, I warned others about this IRL but they wouldn't listen. Now they're going to have to pay the price of losing freedoms for security. Then again the UK Government was going downhill ever since they started to push for mass surveillance. I'm pretty sure it was earlier than that. But that's my two cents.
English
3
2
35
6.1K
NeroTsumi 🪄🍮
NeroTsumi 🪄🍮@KuroSekaiAnime·
Vtuber Mimi was arrested because of suggestive art of her model in the UK, she is out on bail but there is an on going investigation going over her accounts contents, reminder the UK is a hell hole, if you value freedom of expression its important to speak against this.
NeroTsumi 🪄🍮 tweet media
English
131
891
4.6K
521.7K
Fur5
Fur5@Fur5658·
I don't see this as weird because it is a very first world problem that makes no sense at all. But what is important is that lolicons in general are actively being censored by account suspension or threats in general. That is the problem, if they are censoring lolicons for what they consume, then they're against Freedom of Speech. I care about lolicons because they're anybody, they're your average person who so happens to consume that kind of content. They should not be targeted as such, because they should have Freedom of Speech. If I do not protect their Freedom of Speech, then someone else will take away my Freedom of Speech. Just like how Age Verification is being pushed to stop children from consuming porn or anything NSFW. That is the gateway to a surveillance state, and that is something I do not want anyone to ever experience. Lolicons in general, don't hurt real children because they are not into them, there are rare exceptions, but that's that, an exception. And it is unfair to treat them as something to censor, they have rights like anyone else. If they genuinely were into real children, we would not be having this discussion at all. Which is why I tend to go out of my way to protect them, I do not want them censored.
English
1
0
1
58
Chad
Chad@puppywhistle69·
@Fur5658 @ChibiReviews Because it’s pornographic drawings of children even if they’re fictional. And I’m saying if you do not see this as weird that is because pedophelia is already normalized to you
English
1
0
1
40
Fur5
Fur5@Fur5658·
@puppywhistle69 @ChibiReviews How exactly is it as you say child porn? How does this normalize pedophilia because I want to know from your perspective.
English
3
0
1
72
Chad
Chad@puppywhistle69·
@Fur5658 @ChibiReviews Because thinking cartoon child porn is okay means pedophelia is normalized in your mind
English
1
0
1
69
Fur5
Fur5@Fur5658·
Really depends on where you live or work in the U.S. but in Urban Centers. Those are the worse, some of the drivers on the road clearly don't know how to drive and get into collisions. The 1 to 2 hour timeframe makes sense for most people. As for I, I tend to live away from Urban Centers and I do remote work for a living as it's the nature of my work so I'm limited to what I can say about traffic on my end.
English
0
0
0
26
Alta
Alta@404Alta·
Американцы, к вам есть вопрос. Сказав другу американцу что мой путь до работы составляет час+ через город, он ахуел потому что ему до работы ехать 10-15 минут по хайвею. Какая продолжительность пути до работы для вас Окей/среднячок/пиздец ну это нахуй?
Русский
26
1
26
2.5K
DB Firearms
DB Firearms@ArthurClaudeen·
What the frick did you just freakin’ say about me, you little jerk? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Qaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed eliminations. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I’m the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the heck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth. Mark my darn words. You think you can get away with saying that junk to me over the Internet? Think again, buddy. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You’re toast, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can take you out in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable behind off the face of the continent, you little fool. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little “clever” comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you silly goose. I will rain fury all over you and you will drown in it. You’re done for, kiddo.
English
5
2
39
1.5K
TheDoomerTapes
TheDoomerTapes@DoomerTapes·
To the men who "dont want" to participate in community or local government. Do you also "not want" to go to the gym? Do you "not want" to eat healthy? Do you "not want" to go to work? What are you, a child?
English
103
15
363
11.4K
Fur5
Fur5@Fur5658·
Not sure how they're going to enforce it. If they won't let you install files to make an FGC 9 or the Urutau. Pretty sure Mullvad or AirVPN exists. Even then say you're running either Artix Linux or Devuan, you can download Cura Appimage or OrcaSlicer and with the VPN and continue your merry way. And for the 3D printers, I have a few words to say about that. But it's goes like this: Raspberry Pi, Klipper, and Local Network. Again this would affect California or other states willing to do this, they can make the files inaccessible in the state, not the rest of the country. That is if they keep pushing then it's now different countries IP Addresses to use.
English
1
1
2
316
Brian Roemmele
Brian Roemmele@BrianRoemmele·
“California's 3D Printer Law Would Criminalize Open Source, Enshittify The 3D Printing Space” Read it again: Criminalize Open Source. For the back row: CRIMINALIZE OPEN SOURCE 3D PRINTERS.
Brian Roemmele tweet media
English
111
633
1.7K
36.2K
Fur5
Fur5@Fur5658·
If there already is some kind of WiFi functionality in a Car. It is going to be exploited at some point. Much like any computer or software. The question in being is that if we trust Automotive manufacturers and the U.S. Government to protect our data which I can safely say is not to trust them.
English
0
0
5
103
Shlippi
Shlippi@realshlippi·
Can't wait for hackers to find a way to abuse this. I laughed at Watchdogs because of how stupid the idea of connecting literally everything to the internet, putting cameras in everything, and that people would be totally OK with it. We are living in the stupidest, most dystopia timeline, I swear.
English
3
2
76
1.3K
Pirat_Nation 🔴
Pirat_Nation 🔴@Pirat_Nation·
Your Next Car Could Watch Everything You Do While Driving A U.S. law requires all new cars sold in the United States to have special technology to track the driver These driver monitoring systems will use inward-facing infrared cameras and sensors to: >Track your eye movements, pupil dilation, head position, and blinking >Detect signs of drowsiness, distraction, or sudden medical issues >Possibly include passive breath-alcohol sensors in the future If the car decides you’re not fit to drive, it could: >Prevent the engine from starting >Limit speed or disable features >Issue warnings >In extreme cases, gradually slow down and safely pull the vehicle over The technology is not fully ready yet, government says current systems are not reliable enough.
Pirat_Nation 🔴 tweet media
English
186
169
857
41.9K
Fur5
Fur5@Fur5658·
Keyword: "Yet" You know this will be a way to control Freedom of Movement. We could in theory try to circumvent it by trying to make Open Source software to block this. Though considering how John Deere treated farmers. This would be a very legal gray area, something I will expect Automotive manufacturers and the law to treat anyone that wants to remove or block cameras.
English
1
0
6
623
Fur5
Fur5@Fur5658·
@hanaamurakami Unsure if it would happen, but if it happens, it happens. I would still be skeptical though.
English
0
0
0
2.6K
Hana🌸
Hana🌸@hanaamurakami·
Would you date a mid Japanese girl? 👀 ◯ Yes ◯ No ◯ Depends
English
5.7K
176
13.6K
1.2M