Joy Goo

@Frances_Coppola How is it Apartheid though? Beyond the slogans, do you have an argument?

@Frances_Coppola Yes because Batustans were also disconnected by nature. Population pockets connected by roads & tunnels. Better call them Emirates because the Emirates r also disconnected but they work well with each other & with larger neighbouring states - like how these will work with Israel.

Excellent, so we can stop using the "two-state solution" fiction to pretend Israel isn't a brutal apartheid state.

@Frances_Coppola you're just repeating the usual mindless slogans. the reality is quite different: Israel and the Gulf States would invest in these Emirates, making them developed, educated and wealthy. This is in Israel's interest. But they won't be able to have weapons or security control.

@GenocideSmurf What you describe is in essence the same as this "antiquated model". It is, therefore, apartheid.

@Frances_Coppola That's an antiquated analogy from a completely different system that doesn't work to explain the "emirates" model, especially with 2.5m Arabs living inside Israel proper in total equality with the Jews. Just a false and not very useful comparison to SA

@GenocideSmurf Read and learn. britannica.com/topic/Bantustan

@Frances_Coppola how so? there will obviously be two societies and two different political systems but how does that in any way resemble apartheid?!

@GenocideSmurf What you describe is apartheid.

@Frances_Coppola it is not apartheid They'll have a form of self-rule (whether that's democratic or not is up to them, probably not) in their own areas but without weapons or control of their borders (a state minus as they call it.) This is the best they'll get in any deal.

@GenocideSmurf That's called "apartheid". And it is not remotely justified by Oct 7th.

@vanikehuman it'a similar to African or Caribbean syncretic christianity

The existence and flourishing of Mormonism is one of the best arguments against Christianity.

@IhabHassane You're not going to force 900.000 jews out of Judea. That's their land now and they'll enforce the rules in their own security interests. You've lost and there's nothing you can do about it unless you want to end up like Gaza.

You cannot build "illegally" on your own land. The West Bank is occupied Palestinian territory under international law. Israel has no sovereign authority there. The only illegal construction in the West Bank is Israeli settlements — built on stolen Palestinian land.

@CoreyWriting you gotta make fun of the dog rape story though, it's just too absurd to take seriously

Why would these two say this on a red carpet? Even if you think it’s untrue, rape allegations are not something you joke about.

@bobbyknucksss @kaspars_gasuns @MouinRabbani joycean bot lol

@GenocideSmurf @kaspars_gasuns @MouinRabbani Akin to a bot

Israel flunkies are now going back in history to whitewash earlier colonial conquests and genocides in an effort to whitewash their own criminal enterprise. As with their own history, they also fabricate an invented past to make their case. Contrary to the claim below, the French conquest of Algeria had nothing to do with the enslavement of Europeans and Americans. For centuries, corsairs, or state-sponsored pirates, operated throughout the Mediterranean. North African corsairs captured European (and later American) ships, seizing their cargo and capturing their crew and passengers in order to enslave or ransom them. European corsairs similarly captured Ottoman and other ships and enslaved or ransomed their crews and passengers. The various corsairs also raided and plundered coastal settlements in southern Europe and northern Africa. By the time French troops occupied Algiers in 1830, the seizure of US ships had already ended as a result of the Barbary Wars. North African corsairs had stopped attacking US ships in 1805 at the conclusion of the First Barbary War, but had resumed their activities during the War of 1812 after they were encouraged to attack American shipping by Britain. The attacks on US ships definitively ceased in 1815 with the end of the Second Barbary War. The French invaded Algeria, then known as the Regency of Algiers, in 1830. By that time both North African and European corsairs had already largely ceased operations. The proximate cause of the French conquest of Algeria is what was known as the Bakri-Busnach Affair. Two Algerian merchants, Bakri and Busnach, had during the Napoleonic Wars supplied the French military with large amounts of grain. Napoleon refused to pay his bills, as well as others incurred by previous French governments to the duo’s company. As a result the merchants were unable to repay the large loans they had taken from the ruler of Algiers to finance their dealings with France. The Affair was therefore not just a commercial dispute between Algerian merchants and their French clients, but also a diplomatic one between the governments of Algiers and France. Bakri and Busnach were Sephardic Jews, whose families had found refuge in Algiers after their expulsion from Spain. At one point their company sent two representatives, Jacob Cohen Bakri and Simon Abousaya, to France to collect their debts and use the funds to settle their loan. Instead of paying up, the French authorities arrested them. Intervention by Algiers secured their release, and also an agreement to settle the debt. The French however declined to fulfil their commitments, and further efforts by Algiers and the merchants to recoup their losses similarly came to nothing. Tensions increased further when Algiers suspected Paris and the merchants were colluding to deprive Algiers of funds it was owed, and thereby weaken it vis-à-vis France. In 1827, in what came to be known as the Fly Whisk Incident, the Algerian ruler Hussain Dey hit the French Consul, Pierre Deval, in the face with a fly whisk at a public gathering, and ordered him out, in exasperation at being informed by Deval that there had been no progress in the Affair. For good measure Deval had also made various disparaging remarks about Islam and Muslims. Paris seized upon this as a casus belli, at a time when the French monarch, Charles X, was facing increasing domestic challenges and eager to divert attention to a patriotic campaign abroad. Fortified by support from Istanbul and Britain, Hussain refused to apologise, and the subsequent French blockade did more damage to French commerce in Marseille than to Algiers. The crisis was ultimately resolved by the French occupation of Algiers in 1830. By the time France consolidated its rule over Algeria in 1875, between 500,000 and one million Algerians, out of a total population of some three million, lay dead. Many scholars describe the French pacification campaign as a genocidal war. The above details notwithstanding, France’s motivations in seizing Algeria were ultimately no different than those that led it and other European powers to occupy and colonize other territories around the globe. It had everything to do with France’s commercial interests and its rivalries with other powers, and absolutely nothing to do with what it liked to call "La mission civilisatrice". The pretensions of Israel flunkies aside, it is useful to bear in mind that colonialism and its associated crimes is infinitely more vile than the worst of its victims.

@bobbyknucksss @kaspars_gasuns @MouinRabbani I don't give a shit about the algo, I'm here for the kicks

@GenocideSmurf @kaspars_gasuns @MouinRabbani Outcome over intention Hint: boosting algorithm

@Ravi70429180 @MouinRabbani the French had become casualty averse and were being systematically undermined by the Left at home. Americans are similarly casualty averse (and being undermined by the Left) today which makes them weaker and less able to achieve their geopolitical objectives

@GenocideSmurf @MouinRabbani True to some extent but then again the amoral rule by the strongest is still vulnerable to Uprisings i.e. The French in this case got eventually kicked out of Algeria.

@NiohBerg they'll fire because they've promised it and they can't be seen to back down. they see the Shiite community in Lebanon not just as a military asset but a key component of their ideological plan to dominate the Middle East

Two things might happen after today's Beirut strikes: 1) The IRGC attacks Israel because that's what they threatened last week 2) They back down Personally I find it way more likely that they'll back down. Unlike Trump, they know Netanyahu won't hold back and is itching to get back to war.

Ballot harvesting is so corrupt that even third-world dictators find others ways to rig the vote because it’s too obvious. Yet it’s “legal” in California, a state that can’t count a local election in under a month. Just insane we put up with this.

Who is making them do this?

🚨 BREAKING: Multiple NHS services have been told to not detain psychotic African and Caribbean people to lower their "over representation." Valdo Calocane was one of these psychotic Africans who staff refused to detain because of his race. He went on to murder Barnaby Webber, Grace O'Malley-Kumar and Ian Coates in Nottingham.

Love this picture. Synagogues in the US stayed open 24 hours to pray for the troops on D Day.

In Paris a street vendor near the Eiffel Tower was seen storing kebab food in a sewer drain to sell later. Paris fourth world.

Would guarantee this film has the historical accuracy of Wakanda.