𝙶𝚛𝚞𝚖𝚙𝚢 𝙾𝚕𝚍𝚖𝚊𝚗

7.8K posts

𝙶𝚛𝚞𝚖𝚙𝚢 𝙾𝚕𝚍𝚖𝚊𝚗 banner
𝙶𝚛𝚞𝚖𝚙𝚢 𝙾𝚕𝚍𝚖𝚊𝚗

𝙶𝚛𝚞𝚖𝚙𝚢 𝙾𝚕𝚍𝚖𝚊𝚗

@GrumpyRando

𝙿𝚛𝚘-𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚋𝚞𝚕𝚕𝚜𝚑𝚒𝚝 𝚍𝚎𝚝𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚘𝚛. 𝙴𝚗𝚓𝚘𝚢𝚎𝚛 𝚘𝚏 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚜𝚔𝚎𝚢. 𝙰𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚞𝚛 𝚜𝚕𝚊𝚌𝚔𝚎𝚛.

𝚃𝚎𝚡𝚊𝚜 شامل ہوئے Kasım 2020
449 فالونگ458 فالوورز
B̲eth ЌΔ𝓨 🔥
B̲eth ЌΔ𝓨 🔥@PoisonDeathShot·
Space is fake. Rockets are fake. Globe earth is fake. Meteors are fake. Gravity is fake. The Moon Landing is fake. Astronauts are fake. Now what?
English
192
59
500
10.6K
Ruud 🇳🇱
Ruud 🇳🇱@Ruud55716052·
@GrumpyRando Contrails go away after a few minutes, chemtrails wil stay and make the sky grey.
English
5
0
4
109
Ruud 🇳🇱
Ruud 🇳🇱@Ruud55716052·
Chemtrails in Nederland. Kijk eens wat vaker naar boven. ^
Ruud 🇳🇱 tweet media
Nederlands
40
60
181
2.1K
Rich O'Toole
Rich O'Toole@RichOToole·
Y’all ever heard of this? It’s really good.
Rich O'Toole tweet media
English
18
1
63
2.9K
William Shatner
William Shatner@WilliamShatner·
And for the #teslarites who don’t understand 500 miles. Time is money. How long does it take to pump a tank of gas? 4-5 mins versus 30. Early last week I went up to the Yosemite area (about 300 miles.) I got up there, did my thing and got gas (5 mins) and drove back. With a Tesla. It would be drive up (maybe on one charge) charge up 20-30 mins, do my thing. Drive back, stop along the way to recharge (again probably another 20 mins…) That’s too long. 500 would be one recharge so it’s 10 mins gas versus 29-30 mins which I would consider.🤷🏼
English
870
44
1.5K
203.2K
𝙶𝚛𝚞𝚖𝚙𝚢 𝙾𝚕𝚍𝚖𝚊𝚗
@alexboge This is a good read. x.com/mcccanm/status…
KC-10 Driver ✈️ 👨‍✈️ B-737 Wrangler@MCCCANM

A funny combat sortie in the KC-10: We’re meeting up w/ a formation of British Tornados to fuel them in Afghanistan. Our next customers, F-16s if I recall correctly, announced they were showing up early, too. We de-conflicted them altitude wise & arranged the meeting point. As we approach, I can see both formations. They are nearing a rendezvous point from maybe 135° off different headings, the Tornados are closer. We’ll fly over & do a turn to help them get behind us…the Vipers have more time & will maneuver to wherever we are. Anyway, suddenly the Tornados start dispensing flares & roll hard, pulling G to get to a different aspect of something & splitting up. The Vipers soon follow…or maybe they did simultaneously, I could only really see one flight at a time. 4 jets all getting away from us as fast as they can. It takes me a second to figure out what’s going on. You see, the KC-10 had no real sensors. If someone was shooting at us, we didn’t know unless we saw it with our eyes. That was it, that was all we had. If we did manage to see it, we had no flares to dispense or any other countermeasures. We could try to turn or maneuver vertically. Good luck, Maverick, remember it still weighs 550,00 lbs after you’ve burned 40,000 to get to the front. The fighters, though, had systems that can “see” a missile launch. They don’t need a “radar lock on them” like in the movies…the sensors see the heat plume & maybe even the track of a missile & can automatically start dispensing flares & such. It’s a necessity…not all missiles are guided by radar, some look for the Infrared Profile. In layman’s terms, they are “Heat Seekers”, but it’s way more complicated than that. So they are sitting & watching with sensors that don’t send out a signal to be detected until they launch…it’s extremely difficult to tell you are being targeted until it’s in the air. (These missiles have gone through decades of being developed, having countermeasures developed to defeat them, then developing a way to defeat countermeasures, to have new countermeasures introduced, etc., etc.. They are very sophisticated) But then they launch, and the second they do there are warnings in the cockpit…hiding the heat plume of a missile is pretty difficult. If equipped, the jet may dispense flares or other countermeasures automatically. Missiles come fast, you’ll only have a little reaction time to change your aspect & evade. So, there I am, watching the fighters go away, and realizing why they are doing it. Then realizing I can’t do anything & even if I could, it was too late. After maybe 30 seconds with no loud bang, I start thinking this has taken too long. There is some amount of time that passes, but eventually the Tornados come on the radio & apologized for a false alarm. Their sensors had picked up & interpreted a heat plume from the ground & sounded the alarm. I don’t know if the Tornado dispenses flares automatically or not, but it looked cool when the flares all came out. Viper pilots don’t apologize. You should never expect an apology from a Viper pilot. I was probably in the wrong for endangering them. I didn’t say it on the radio, but I wanted to say “what fucking alarm, dude, you bailed & didn’t say a damn thing to the brightest meatball in the sky”. What I said is something along the lines of “no problem, join up left wing, we’re trailing the drogue”. Hope you liked the story! As a coincidence, this is what I find questionable about video of an F-35 flying in a straight line & doing nothing after an IR missile is launched against it, then just keeps flying in the same straight line after getting hit & I wonder what the wingman was doing, too. P.S.: new tankers & military cargo jets have sensors now, too. You can google “LAIRCMS” & go down the rabbit hole. Enjoy! Also, picture is not related to the story.

English
0
0
1
18
Alex Boge
Alex Boge@alexboge·
Viral clips aren’t evidence - they’re how bad narratives spread. And the F-35 “shot down by Iran” narrative is already getting out of hand. Here’s what’s actually confirmed: U.S. Central Command says a Lockheed F-35 Lightning II returned to base after a mission over Iran and made an emergency landing. Pilot is safe. Cause is still under investigation. That’s it. Everything else - including the viral “missile hit” video - is unverified. Now the bigger point: There is no such thing as an untouchable aircraft. Never has been. • Lockheed U-2 - designed to be unreachable. Shot down in 1960. • Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk - stealth pioneer. Shot down in 1999 by a decades-old system. • In Ukraine, low-cost drones are destroying multi-million-dollar assets on both sides. High-tech systems don’t eliminate risk - they shift the odds. Even if an F-35 were hit, that wouldn’t be some shocking failure. The F-35 is a stealth aircraft, but like all stealth platforms, it’s not invisible, and it’s designed as a multirole system rather than a pure air-dominance stealth platform like the Lockheed F-22 Raptor. Stealth reduces detection and engagement probability. It does not make an aircraft invincible. It should also be noted: F-35s have flown thousands of combat sorties across multiple theaters. And despite that, there has not been a confirmed combat shootdown of an F-35. If this incident turns out to involve damage from hostile fire, it would be notable - not because it’s impossible, but because it’s rare. ⸻ Also worth noting something I’m seeing all over X: The accounts pushing this the hardest - with the most dramatic “CONFIRMED shootdown” headlines - are the same ones that consistently: • portray the U.S. as weak or incompetent • amplify adversary narratives • and frame every incident as a catastrophic failure That pattern matters. Because it tells you this isn’t just analysis - it’s narrative building. And one last reality check: There’s no reason to assume Iran would only be using “low-tech” systems. If anything, this is exactly the kind of scenario where more capable, modern air defenses would be used. Bottom line: One unverified clip + motivated amplification ≠ confirmed shootdown, and even a confirmed hit ≠ collapse of advanced airpower It’s just warfare doing what it always does: Testing systems, exposing edges, and driving the next round of adaptation.
Alex Boge tweet media
English
4
1
13
319
Terrible Maps
Terrible Maps@TerribleMaps·
The weirdest foods in each U.S. state
Terrible Maps tweet media
English
668
182
2.8K
939.6K
Jade Helm
Jade Helm@UncleBosey1·
This is out of Houston. Two “meteors” is the same frame.
English
789
1.4K
6.5K
408.8K
Paul
Paul@paul_vk6·
Nothing to see here.. Got chemtailed this morning.. I hate the governments.
Paul tweet media
English
16
8
23
571
Kasumi
Kasumi@KasumiKriss·
Are there still people out there who think this is normal?
Kasumi tweet media
English
313
320
1.2K
26.7K
Dominique Blanchard
Dominique Blanchard@dominochef·
@mtntallpaul @KasumiKriss Wrong ! Not any longer. They ALL contain TOXIC METALS AND POISON. Silver iodide? Mercury? Strontium? Aluminum? Is that normal? NO! You can even gather enough on your windshield some day. Some took samples for analysis and its written in the patents! Research it. DOD DARPA. 😈
English
8
0
0
248
Thyme2Choose
Thyme2Choose@ranchette1·
It used to a rare thing when a person could get a photo of a crime while it was taking place.
Thyme2Choose tweet media
English
12
34
132
1.5K