Michael E. Smith

22.4K posts

Michael E. Smith banner
Michael E. Smith

Michael E. Smith

@MichaelESmith

Archaeologist, Arizona State Univ. Aztecs, Teotihuacan. Ancient & modern cities. Transdisciplinary, materialist, historical, occasionally musical. Kino the dog.

Tempe, AZ Katılım Haziran 2011
3.4K Takip Edilen7.7K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Michael E. Smith
Michael E. Smith@MichaelESmith·
My book is now out in paperback! It is a comparative perspective on early cities, from a social-science perspective (population, economics, politics). I cover both top-down & bottom-up influences on urban life. 29 case studies, and many illustrations. bit.ly/40iU33d
Michael E. Smith tweet media
English
5
16
146
7.5K
Michael E. Smith retweetledi
Sam Haselby
Sam Haselby@samhaselby·
The engine of social mobility and democracy is cheap, high quality public education: CUNY, the great land grant universities, the state schools, community colleges, HBCUs. In the scheme of things, a few token poors at U of Chicago or Harvard means nothing.
Ihtesham Ali@ihtesham2005

A four-year degree at the University of Chicago costs $386,000. They just made it free for almost every family in America. Starting Fall 2027, any household earning under $250,000 a year pays zero tuition. Under $125,000, the school also covers the dorm, the meal plan, and every fee. The most expensive university in the Midwest just became one of the cheapest options in the country for almost anyone who can get in. To understand how absurd this is, look at what you used to have to pay. UChicago undergraduate tuition for 2025 to 2026 is $73,266. Full cost of attendance with room, board, fees, books, and living expenses is roughly $93,000 a year. Across four years, the full price tag runs close to $386,000. That is the cost of a house in most American states. For a single college degree. The school had a previous free tuition threshold sitting at $125,000 of household income. They just doubled it overnight. The first thing nobody is saying out loud is what the $250,000 number actually means. The median household income in the United States is roughly $80,000. Households earning $250,000 sit in the top 5% of the entire country. UChicago is now telling 95% of American families that the sticker price does not apply to them. The most selective private university in the Midwest, the school that produced more Nobel laureates per capita than almost any institution on Earth, just stopped charging tuition to almost everyone who could realistically get in. The second thing nobody is saying is what happens to the families just under $125,000. They are not getting a discount. They are getting a fully paid four-year residential education at one of the top ten universities in the world. Tuition, dorm, meal plan, fees, all of it. Zero. A family making $120,000 a year is sending their kid to a school whose advertised cost is $93,000 a year and writing checks for nothing. The third thing is the part that should be making every other elite university nervous. UChicago is not the first to do this. MIT moved to $200,000 last year. Harvard moved to $200,000. Stanford moved to $150,000 with free room and board under $100,000. Princeton has had a version of this for years. Penn just announced a similar policy. The number is climbing every cycle and the trigger for each new announcement is the previous announcement. Every school watching this is now under pressure to match or get embarrassed in the next admissions cycle. UChicago just set the new ceiling at $250,000. Somebody is going to push it to $300,000 within twelve months. The reason the ceiling keeps moving is not generosity. It is competition for the same 3,000 students. The top 20 universities in America are fighting for the same applicant pool every year. When MIT made tuition free under $200,000, every kid in that bracket who got into both MIT and a school still charging full price stopped weighing the decision. The free school wins. The sticker price has stopped being a price for the people the universities want most. It has become a posted number that only the rich actually pay, and the rich do not need a discount to attend. The endowments are what make this possible. UChicago is sitting on $10.4 billion. Harvard is at $53 billion. MIT is at $25 billion. Stanford is at $36 billion. These are not schools running on tuition revenue. They are hedge funds with classrooms attached, and the tuition line on their balance sheet is a rounding error compared to investment returns and donor giving. Free tuition under $250,000 costs them almost nothing relative to what they earn each year on the endowment alone. The cruel reality is that the schools that can afford to make this announcement are exactly the schools that did not need to. The state university charging $30,000 a year cannot copy this. The small private liberal arts college running on a $400 million endowment cannot copy this. The cost of college in America is not going down. It is bifurcating. The top of the pyramid is now functionally free for almost everyone who gets admitted. Everything below it is getting more expensive every year. The student loan debt in America just crossed $1.8 trillion. The average graduate owes around $37,000. Forty-three million Americans are carrying education debt right now. And the schools that produce the smallest percentage of that debt are the ones that just made themselves free. There is a generation of kids growing up right now whose parents earn $200,000 a year and quietly assumed UChicago, Harvard, MIT, and Stanford were out of reach. They were wrong. The schools they thought they could not afford are the only ones they actually can. The hardest part of attending the University of Chicago in 2027 is no longer paying for it. It is getting in.

English
8
40
228
11.3K
Michael E. Smith retweetledi
pxt
pxt@paulxt·
Today at the magazine: We've unearthed a never-before-seen essay by Joan Didion on the Grateful Dead. powmag.net/p/a-little-dee…
English
1
50
219
58.9K
Phil Sledge
Phil Sledge@PhilSledge·
Post the latest photo of your pet on your phone. I’ll go first. No cheating 👀
Phil Sledge tweet media
English
292
38
425
8K
Michael E. Smith
Michael E. Smith@MichaelESmith·
@TheEXECUTlONER_ Google AI: "Air conditioners are placed on roofs in Arizona primarily to maximize efficiency by improving airflow, keep units above dusty ground-level debris, & save valuable ground space." Also prevents copper theft, & simplifies installation for homes with attic-based ductwork
English
0
0
1
62
👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈
👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈@TheEXECUTlONER_·
This man is in Phoenix, Arizona visiting his daughter. It is 108* there!🥵 He noticed this unit on top of her house and wondered why it isn’t on the ground like most houses. He asked her and she said that was the way it was when they bought the house. Why would this be on top of the roof? I’ve lived in 5 different states and never seen them on the roof. And notice how big it is, it’s huge! Why would they be on the roof? What’s the reasoning? And 108*? Are people really digging a 108* weather? Could you handle that?
English
4K
300
3.5K
6M
Michael E. Smith
Michael E. Smith@MichaelESmith·
@kathrwn @scientistsorg Your intro is far to fast, its hard to follow. You need to say who this guy is, why should anyone care what he says. More involved: it would help if you could add a few text items, for example, a list of the different positions that he outlines.
English
1
0
2
71
unregistered hyperkate 2
it finally happened: i'm in front of a camera for a @scientistsorg vid. eek! in the first installment of How Do You Govern the Future? i sat down with my friend/colleague/british guy Dr. Ollie Stephenson to talk effective AI policy in the time of doom/hype cycle 🔗below
unregistered hyperkate 2 tweet media
English
4
0
7
288
Solar Heavy
Solar Heavy@SolarHeavy·
have you heard this?
English
2
7
42
112.9K
Michael E. Smith
Michael E. Smith@MichaelESmith·
Kino and I enjoyed “Dog days at the garden” this morning at the Desert botanical garden. Kino liked the wikiup.
Michael E. Smith tweet mediaMichael E. Smith tweet mediaMichael E. Smith tweet media
English
0
0
9
152
Phil Sledge
Phil Sledge@PhilSledge·
Post the recent photo of your pet on your phone. I’ll go first. No cheating 😂
Phil Sledge tweet media
English
963
58
1.2K
42K
The Figen
The Figen@TheFigen_·
Don't laugh at the Buffalo. 😂
English
358
1.5K
20.2K
1.4M
Michael E. Smith
Michael E. Smith@MichaelESmith·
@xriskology This is one reason I am very happy to be retiring from teaching next week. My research nd writing will go on, of course
English
0
0
0
20
Dr. Émile P. Torres (they/them)
absolute disaster: many students learn literally nothing throughout the semester, and this is one BIG reason I left academia (it's collapsing). I frequently speak with profs who feel the same way: what is even the point of standing in front of students lecturing? Or assigning
English
4
3
96
2.7K
Dr. Émile P. Torres (they/them)
No, unfortunately! I experienced this first-hand at my university. My professor friends complain about it constantly. Even the students I speak with say that no one reads or writes anymore (those who want to are pressured into using AI for competitive advantage). It's an
Dr. Émile P. Torres (they/them) tweet media
Taylor Lorenz@TaylorLorenz

YUP

English
10
12
212
34.7K
Phil Sledge
Phil Sledge@PhilSledge·
Post the last photo of your pet on your phone. I’ll go first. No cheating 😂
Phil Sledge tweet media
English
754
37
913
29.5K
Amelia Collins
Amelia Collins@ameliacute01·
Bro really thought he was playing GTA in real life and just casually sent her off the map. 😭 My soul would have left my body the exact second I went over that edge. There is not enough money on this entire planet to get me to sit on that slide. 📉💀
English
671
211
1.7K
2.8M
Mark Collard
Mark Collard@profmarkcollard·
"Some of our archaeologist co-authors were just really distressed." I'm pretty skeptical about this claim. Seems like hype to me. I've had a lot of conversations with fellow archaeologists since the aDNA 'revolution. I've also sat through innumerable archaeological talks over the same time period. And 'distressed' is not a word I'd use to describe the archaeological community's reactions to the findings of aDNA research. Mostly, the responses have been along the lines of "that's really cool." The negative reactions have mainly focused on aDNA researchers lack of familiarity with debates in archaeology. Oh, and, ironically, the hyping of findings.
Dwarkesh Patel@dwarkesh_sp

David Reich on how much ancient DNA evidence has overturned so much consensus thinking how ancient cultures spread. "It wasn't peaceful, it wasn't friendly, it wasn't nice. Some of our archaeologist co-authors were just really distressed."

English
30
16
121
21.1K