HeyAndrey.sol

The presale everyone’s talking about 👀 I’ve applied to the @AllDomainsFDN whitelist Application ID: VEF5C Get yours 👇 launch.alldomains.foundation/?v=1

Quest mode activated! ✅ Stacking beans and building alliances for Gassy Jack's beanstalk climb. Build a Gasless Future and unlock rewards together. LFGGasless! 🚀 ethgas.com/community/onbo… ethgas.com/community/onbo…

IF YOU KNOW WHAT SOLANA IS KEEP READING If you have used the sol-incinerator like this post if you enjoy using the sol-incinerator RT this post (collecting data for analysis) 🔥

Quest mode activated! ✅ Stacking beans and building alliances for Gassy Jack's beanstalk climb. Build a Gasless Future and unlock rewards together. LFGGasless! 🚀 ethgas.com/community/onbo… ethgas.com/community/onbo…

Every quest adds strength to the soil! I'm collecting beans to fuel Gassy Jack's climb out of the gassy world 💨 Invite others to multiply the growth and share in the rewards. Jump in now👇 ethgas.com/community/onbo… ethgas.com/community/onbo…

🚀Join me on @Gradient_HQ — The open layer for edge compute on Solana. Set up your #GradientSentry Node and be part of the future. app.gradient.network/signup?code=95… #GradientNetwork

He has no legal expertise. Putting him as chair is a blatant insult not only to those in the legal profession but to all of us taxpayers.

5. Lastly, the Supreme Court in Leonen’s ponencia emphasized that the House must follow due process. What Leonen forgets is that due process is not limited to the adversarial process that everyone is accustomed to - na may two sides who will rebut and counter each other then a Judge will listen and decide who is correct. Due process can also be embodied in an inquisitorial type of procedure which actually many jurisdictions in the world follow when deciding whether to file criminal charges. And that is in fact what the Constitution envisioned by separating the sole power to initiate or charge an impeachable officer with impeachment and giving it to the House versus the sole power to try impeachment cases and giving it to the Senate. The adversarial type of due process is embodied in the Senate trial while the inquisitorial type is embodied in the House. What the SC decision today requiring the House to follow more procedures is not just micromanaging it and violating the separation of powers. What the SC did is WORSE - it is effectively AMENDING the Constitution aka committing the legal sin of judicial legislation. The Constitution is clear - when 1/3 of the House sign and endorse an impeachment complaint, it becomes by operation of law THE Articles of Impeachment that is to be transmitted to the Senate where trial should proceed fortwith. Have we all forgotten Speaker Manny Villar transmitting the Articles of Impeachment forthwith to the Senate upon gathering 1/3 signature?? The Supreme Court is not empowered to insert MORE procedures from the time that 1/3 House members sign an impeachment complaint to the transmittal of the same constituting the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate. 6. As emblematic of a classic Leonen decision, it is full of obiter dictum especially in the beginning and in the end. He preaches like he is almighty and all knowing without ever actually realizing that he is making the wrong argument and an argument that is in fact more about him than whoever he thinks he is talking to. He says: “We understand our history. We have learned that in the past, momentary desires to do what is convenient and concede means to ends have inadvertently created precedents that weaken the succor of law for those who dissent, or those at our society’s margins, or those who may have fallen out of grace from the powers that be. We have learned that the clash of political interests in the past, often disguised by noble intentions, has obscured the need to address the real problems of corruption, inequality, poverty, and disempowerment faced by our people.” I wonder what history he is looking at. If Sara Duterte is the symbol of those who dissent or those at society’s margins, then Leonen is living in a different reality. #SeparationOfPowers #UnconstitutionalDecision

WHY THE SUPREME COURT DECISION DECLARING THE IMPEACHMENT OF SARA DUTERTE AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL IS WRONG; WITH ALL DUE RESPECT I’ve read the full Supreme Court decision written by the ponente Justice Marvic Leonen. MASSIVE INCONSISTENCIES or illogical writing permeate his ponente and justifications. 1. Leonen says that the first three impeachment complaints COMPLIED with the constitutional requirement that they be included in the Order of Business of the House of Representatives within ten (10) session days - with the 36th session day of the HoR falling on February 3 to February 5 - because the first three complaints were included in the Order of Business on February 5. (Page 64 of the decision) 2. However, Leonen made a logical jump or out of this world conclusion when he said in the same paragraph that: “Such action is incomplete if the first three impeachment complaints are to be considered initiated because they were still not referred to the proper committee, i.e. the Committee on Justice.” This quasi conclusion is confusing - the Respondents were arguing that the first three complaints did not initiate the one-year ban because they were not referred. And yet, here comes Leonen ADMITTING that the first three impeachment complaints were indeed not referred to the Committee on Justice on February 5 AND YET in the same breath wants to come to a forced conclusion that the first three complaints are still considered to be initiated… “because they were still not referred to the proper committee”??? 3. Then on Page 68 of the Decision, Leonen comes to the conclusion that “These turn of events show that the first three complaints were neglected or even willfully unacted upon.” How disgusting to presume and conclude that the House was negligent - why would they act on the first three complaints for referral to the Committee on Justice when that would already be unnecessary given the filing of the 4th impeachment complaint signed and endorsed by 1/3 of the House ON FEBRUARY 5 as well?? 4. Regardless, if the Supreme Court admits that the 4th impeachment complaint was filed, signed, endorsed by 1/3 Congressmen and referred to the Senate on February 5, then there can be no violation of the one year bar rule BECAUSE it was on the same day that the first three impeachment complaints “died” or “effectively dismissed.” 1/2

cardinal tagle pls clutch this one i can’t go back to a traditionalist church after experiencing the love from pope francis

Season 5 just started @nodepay 💵 My unused internet bandwidth is now generating real rewards. Sign up & get paid here: app.nodepay.ai/register?ref=2… #Nodepay #AI

Bruh the Chiefs are absolutely cooked. #SuperBowl

"I want to perform their favorite song, but you know they love to sue" - Kendrick Lamar

drake watching kendrick call him a pedophile in front of 100 million people

“Say Drake, I hear you like ‘em young” Why Kendrick look at the camera like 😭

Kendrick called Drake a Pedophile infront of the whole world

Drake watching Kendrick perform Not Like Us in front of the whole world

@itsPampaa This was definitely a failed project.

FAILED PROJECTS OR RUGPULLS? Let Me Take You A Trip Down The Memory Lane 👇

Not earning on Nodepay yet? app.nodepay.ai/register?ref=2…

BREAKING: Solana-based memecoin @bonk_inu has burned 1.69 trillion $BONK (worth approximately $50 million) from its total supply after the proposal was approved by Bonk DAO.