
This is a perception problem on your end. You haven’t combed through all documents. You have no idea if what information you’ve been shared is genuine or maliciously designed to push a group consensus. Yes he’s been mentioned as a prior business partner, but no where in the released files is there a shred of evidence he went to the island or was inappropriate with children. You cannot derive guilt just because everyone says so. That’s not how law in this country works.
The difference between us, is I can acknowledge it’s possible he did those things, but I also know not one piece of evidence so far suggests that’s the case.
You haven’t arrived at your conclusion naturally. If you had, you would see things through a more pragmatic lense. Start questioning your perceived reality and ask yourself if I’m being subjugated to propaganda.
English


























