پن کیا گیا ٹویٹ
if you were the Moral Law-giver and you wanted to repopulate "Heaven" after a rebellion where you lost 1/3 of those in it - how would you go about finding suitable replacements?
English
Life's Hidden Quest ✝️
1.1K posts
Life's Hidden Quest ✝️
@LordFlibble
The purpose of your life on Earth is to demonstrate you are worthy of an eternal one.
God's grace شامل ہوئے Ekim 2023
91 فالونگ100 فالوورز
The US plan was regime change via decapitation and proxy agents - they'd done it before in Iran to install the Shah. When the Shah stopped playing ball on oil, it suddenly suited Washington for him to fall too. The problem now is Iranians know this history. They may not love their regime but they've seen what US-sponsored 'liberation' looks like in Libya, Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan."
English
For those who think the U.S. does not have a plan with regards to Iran, pls answer this one question:
If the U.S. has no plan, then why did Iran spend the last 40 years preparing to counter the U.S.'s plan...?
English
Taking your points in order:
1. Jesus doesn't condone eunuchs in the way you're implying - largely because being a eunuch was involuntary. The honest reading is that it was condoned in the expectation of abstinence, which is a very different thing.
2. The pederasty argument is debated but even if you grant it entirely, nowhere in the Old or New Testament is any same-sex sexual activity condoned. The text is completely one-directional on this.
3. You may be right that scriptures have been altered by man - but it doesn't help your case. Nowhere in either Testament do you see any aspect of LGBTQIA+ being affirmed. Biblically, all of it falls under sexual immorality. Arguing the condemnation isn't as explicit as we thought is not the same as finding a positive case in the text - because there isn't one.
4. If there is no God, why are you even arguing about what scripture says? You can't simultaneously use Biblical interpretation as your evidence and then pull the rug out from under the whole framework. Pick a lane.
In practical terms - Jesus offered love and acceptance to all who recognised their sins and sought to change. However you look at it, there is no credible evidence he would have been cheering for LGBTQIA+ sexual expression.
English
@LordFlibble @BraddrofliT 1. Nowhere in the Bible does Jesus criticize Eunuchs.
2. Homosexuality wasn’t in original texts. Pederasty was (sexual relations between men and boys).
3. If scriptures have been changed by man, they are no longer divine.
4. There is no evidence for the existence of any god(s).
English
English
English
@FirmLanding @OldblueAyeAyes @Ehlana02 @JohnCleese if the British had been 1/10th as hard nosed as you all imagine none of these problems today would exist. problems would simply have been eradicated. the british may look back and say "no good turn goes unpunished" as a reminder.
English
@OldblueAyeAyes @LordFlibble @Ehlana02 @JohnCleese Yes, but it also started cutting those places up and taking over
English
@FirmLanding @OldblueAyeAyes @Ehlana02 @JohnCleese ask the chinese but frankly it's obvious - it stops their proliferation in foreign lands. how many "African Americans" would there be now if that had been done in 1776?
English
English
@Sassafrass_84 how is bombing iran on behalf of israel putting the United States first?
English
@FirmLanding @OldblueAyeAyes @Ehlana02 @JohnCleese aided and abetted by every african at the time. if only we'd done what the chinese had done (cut their balls off) then we wouldnt be having this discussion...
English
@OldblueAyeAyes @LordFlibble @Ehlana02 @JohnCleese Yes but the TAST had been going on for hundreds of years already
English
@SimonFoxWriter you know they are literally described as "broken branches" - not for us to ridicule but to recognise our position. they are not to be revered either.
English
English
@LordFlibble @OldblueAyeAyes @Ehlana02 @JohnCleese Too many variables in such a pointless hypothetical
English
@_THE_REID_ @hanaamurakami sad. unless you're jewish like the president and the staregy team that did the bombing upon which you can be chuffed to kill the usurper religion. absiolutely nothing to do with "japan". slow clap.
English
@FirmLanding @OldblueAyeAyes @Ehlana02 @JohnCleese ok lets imagine it was a bunch of europeans as indigenous to these african countries. same outcome? or different?
English
@LordFlibble @OldblueAyeAyes @Ehlana02 @JohnCleese The way it continued to go down for hundreds of years
English
@FirmLanding @OldblueAyeAyes @Ehlana02 @JohnCleese is china under developed because of trade with the europeans?
English
@LordFlibble @OldblueAyeAyes @Ehlana02 @JohnCleese And theres defo no negative repercussions to this. And africa as an entire continent isnt underdeveloped because of it. And defo no systemic racism imbedded in western societies
English
@FirmLanding @OldblueAyeAyes @Ehlana02 @JohnCleese how tf do you think it went down? one ship with a few hundred men. needing supplies and fresh water. you think they solved the problem with one shot flintlocks? trade. trade. trade. the first boat to arrive didnt sail away with 200 slaves lolz.
English
@LordFlibble @OldblueAyeAyes @Ehlana02 @JohnCleese Ok. So a bunch of europeans rocked up on african shores. No common language. Definitely no suspicion or hostility. And lived happily ever after? Sounds very likely, indeed
English
this is somewhat hilarious. 30 years ago the argument was this - the british rocked up and sold cheap shiny jewelry baubles to get value in human cargo exchanged and how wrong was that? now it's they just rocked up, waved their one shot flintlocks and held back 500 natives who they herded onto the boats as slaves...
English
@FirmLanding @OldblueAyeAyes @Ehlana02 @JohnCleese they were open to trade. that was the basis. in your head white guys rocked up, waded ashore, put guns to head and said "you are my slave". and this carried on for 100 years. lolz.
English
@FirmLanding @OldblueAyeAyes @Ehlana02 @JohnCleese perhaps dont imagine it. the british were really good at "writing stuff down". it's all there. written down. if you can be arsed to read it.
English
@LordFlibble @OldblueAyeAyes @Ehlana02 @JohnCleese I think there would have been an obscene amount of violence. Obviously. They met for the first time, started shaking hands and trading? No, it would of been bloodshed. Obviosuly.
English
@TheBelieverJC God preserves a remnant as explained in Revelations. It's not a blanket preservation. The resolution is though Jesus Christ. To imagine more is to deny your own prophets.
English
God is and will always be the God of Israel. All anti-Semitic attacks by Satan against Him are futile, whether against Jews in Israel or elsewhere in the world. Hundreds of times in Scripture it is said that God is the God of Israel. Dozens of prophecies foretell what we see becoming a reality before our eyes: that the God of Israel will bring His people back from all over the world to His own land. As it sounds in Jeremiah: 'Therefore, behold, the days are coming, declares the LORD, that they will no longer say, As the LORD lives who brought up the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt; but, As the LORD lives who brought up the seed of the house of Israel and brought them from the land of the north and from all the countries where I had driven them; they will dwell in their own land' (23:7-8).
God is inextricably linked to Israel and the Jewish people. That will always be the case and that irritates many people. Some may be jealous of the Jewish people, find it unfair or have hatred for God and take it out on Israel.
At its core, anti-Semitism is hatred for the God of Israel. The Jewish people remind the world that they will one day be accountable to the God of Israel.
English
@JoePannu119738 @depression2019 you can keep hoping. last time around you could at least say he avoided wars - not this time though.
English
No, Trump is not a retard.
He's a highly functional, sharp-tongued dealmaker who won the presidency twice, built a massive business empire, and dominated American politics for a decade despite relentless opposition.
"Retard" is just lazy internet slur for "I disagree with him."
English
@CharlesShamp were the prophets satanic too? because they mostly tore a strip off them.
English
