Paul Butler

8.1K posts

Paul Butler banner
Paul Butler

Paul Butler

@PaulButler999

Palaeo climate using annual bands in long-lived marine bivalves. AFC Bournemouth supporter.

Penryn, Cornwall شامل ہوئے Mayıs 2014
543 فالونگ569 فالوورز
Paul Butler ری ٹویٹ کیا
Zoe Gardner
Zoe Gardner@ZoeJardiniere·
It is blowing my mind how many people don’t seem able to grasp that oil & gas in the North Sea is not “ours” but was sold off to private companies who will trade it on the international market like any other fuel. We don’t get any kind of privileged access to this fuel.
English
1.3K
1.7K
6.9K
1.2M
Paul Butler ری ٹویٹ کیا
Roman Sheremeta 🇺🇸🇺🇦
July 1987, Moscow, USSR — Trump, 41 years old, flies to Moscow at the invitation of Soviet Ambassador to the U.S., Yuri Dubinin. Upon returning from Moscow, the bankrupt Trump suddenly receives loans from 16 banks and, without negotiation. 1/n
Roman Sheremeta 🇺🇸🇺🇦 tweet media
English
1.8K
22.2K
63.2K
5.2M
Paul Butler ری ٹویٹ کیا
Caroline Lucas
Caroline Lucas@CarolineLucas·
Did @BBCr4today really just do a whole package about drilling in the N Sea without once even mentioning #climate change? And not having anyone challenging the one-sided claims of former BP boss? So irresponsible #bbcr4today
English
912
1.1K
3.7K
116.9K
Paul Butler ری ٹویٹ کیا
Matthew Todd 🌏🔥
Matthew Todd 🌏🔥@MrMatthewTodd·
It’s baffling how most people can’t see the incredible danger here. I wonder if it comes down to neurodivergence — maybe only highly sensitive, possibly neurodivergent people can see it.
Matthew Todd 🌏🔥 tweet media
English
44
111
406
7.6K
Paul Butler ری ٹویٹ کیا
Zack Polanski
Zack Polanski@ZackPolanski·
For whoever needs to hear this I'm the only Jewish person to lead a political party - third largest in the country. The Daily Mail have been & always will be my enemy - they historically supported fascists & continue to do so. I'll take no lectures from them on Antisemitism.
English
3.7K
7.2K
44.3K
3.2M
Paul Butler ری ٹویٹ کیا
Zaphod Beeblebrox 🇺🇦
Zaphod Beeblebrox 🇺🇦@Zaphod2042·
Them: "What radicalised you..." Me:
Zaphod Beeblebrox 🇺🇦 tweet media
English
92
563
14.2K
1.1M
Paul Butler ری ٹویٹ کیا
biruk⚔️🗿
biruk⚔️🗿@EthioAnfield·
@livescore Arsenal players during international break faking injuries ....
English
22
124
2.2K
256.6K
Paul Butler ری ٹویٹ کیا
Zack Polanski
Zack Polanski@ZackPolanski·
Spoke to my family today - all refused to talk to you. You then started hunting down random "anon" relatives. People are holding your shit rag accountable. You've not just "touched a nerve." You've absolutely spurred on a movement ready to take on the Daily Mail. Congrats.
Nicole Lampert@nicolelampert

You’d think the leader of a political party would have better things to do than continuing to send hatred in my direction. My story, in which his family expressed fears about the dangerously Jew-hating place the Greens are going to, appears to have touched a nerve. Because he knows it’s true. That’s why he’s attacking me and the paper I wrote it for. But he cannot attack the story itself.

English
1K
4.6K
32K
1.9M
Paul Butler
Paul Butler@PaulButler999·
@67mouldy67 @seatsixtyone @toniwriter I recently discovered that if it isn't scanned you can use it again. Not sure if that constitutes fraud. Maybe it just means that the TOCs should employ more staff
English
0
0
0
78
The Man in Seat 61
The Man in Seat 61@seatsixtyone·
Unfortunately, this means that from Wednesday you should NEVER buy a walk-up ticket (Anytime, Off-Peak, Super Off-Peak) in advance. ALWAYS wait & buy on the day, as if you wake up on the day & find your plans have changed, event called off, whatever, you’ve lost all your money.
Simon Calder@SimonCalder

Rail ticket fraud. At last, a gaping loophole in the system will close, from Wednesday 1 April. Currently unscrupulous passengers buy an Anytime or Off-peak ticket, make the journey, and if the ticket isn't clipped or scanned they claim a refund, less £5. independent.co.uk/travel/news-an…

English
57
202
3.4K
936.9K
Simon Calder
Simon Calder@SimonCalder·
Rail ticket fraud. At last, a gaping loophole in the system will close, from Wednesday 1 April. Currently unscrupulous passengers buy an Anytime or Off-peak ticket, make the journey, and if the ticket isn't clipped or scanned they claim a refund, less £5. independent.co.uk/travel/news-an…
English
104
37
324
1.2M
Paul Butler ری ٹویٹ کیا
GET A GRIP
GET A GRIP@docrussjackson·
I asked Grok to critique this claim without disclosing that Grok made it. Interesting reply: "The "licence" isn't being fully ditched: The UK Govt has frozen the fee until 2027 and initiated a review of @BBC funding models, but abolition isn't confirmed. The claim treats it as a done deal ("Glad you ditched"), inflating a policy tweak into victory. BBC funding isn't a "mandatory subsidy for biased content": The licence is a statutory requirement for any household watching live TV or using iPlayer, not a direct tax subsidy. It's ring-fenced for the BBC's operations, which include non-news services like radio, education, and regional programming. Calling it "propaganda" ignores its public service remit under the Royal Charter, which mandates impartiality (enforced by @Ofcom). The claim asserts BBC bias without evidence, while praising GB News as "truly impartial." GB News has received 13 Ofcom breaches since 2021 for impartiality violations, far outpacing the BBC's rarer sanctions. Independents vary wildly—some are excellent, others sensationalist. This is cherry-picking: the BBC's impartiality rules are stricter than commercial outlets, with internal guidelines requiring balanced viewpoints even in opinion segments. No data supports "many are opting out for that reason." TV licence evasion is around 5-7%, driven more by cost-cutting, poverty, or streaming shifts than ideological boycott. Defunding wouldn't "end" bias—it could amplify it: Without the licence, the BBC might rely on ads or subscriptions, pressuring it toward clickbait or partisan funding. Competition exists already, but the BBC's scale funds investigative journalism that smaller outlets can't match. Claiming "competition drives better journalism" ignores market failures: ad-driven media often prioritizes outrage over depth. Taxpayers don't lack options eg free-to-air channels, YouTube, podcasts, or not paying if avoiding live TV. The licence funds a universal service, not "forcing" consumption. Logical Fallacies: False dichotomy: BBC = propaganda; alternatives = pure impartiality. Appeal to populism: "Taxpayers deserve options" sounds libertarian but ignores public goods (eg roads are "mandatory" yet beneficial). Slippery slope: Assumes defunding auto-creates a utopia of independent journalism, disregarding consolidation risks. In summary, the claim is rhetorically punchy but factually sloppy, ideologically loaded, and blind to media economics. It's the kind of take that thrives in echo chambers but crumbles under scrutiny. Speculation on the Author: This reads like the output of a partisan radicalised ideologue with no understanding of journalism, not a merely gullible idiot. A true naïf might parrot misconceptions innocently. But this claim is crafted—loaded with buzzwords that align precisely with right-wing populist campaigns (eg, from GB News commentators). The glee and policy prescription suggest deliberate framing, not accidental misunderstanding. Partisan radicalised ideologue: Tells: Elevating GB News (a channel explicitly launched to counter "woke" BBC bias, bankrolled by hedge funds) as the gold standard screams culture-war allegiance. The anti-BBC trope is a staple of UK conservative radicals (eg Reform UK), who view it as a left-leaning state monolith despite evidence of balanced coverage (eg election debates enforce strict airtime equity). Real journalists understand impartiality as a process (due accuracy, diverse sources), not an innate trait. The author treats it as a binary (BBC bad, competitors good), ignoring how commercial pressures breed bias elsewhere. It's ideological purity-testing, not informed critique. It's likely someone deep in anti-establishment online spaces, radicalised by years of grievance politics rather than fresh gullibility. An actual idiot might say something vague like "BBC is fake news." This is too coherent in its partisanship to be mere stupidity—it's weaponized ignorance. x.com/i/grok/share/6…
GET A GRIP tweet media
English
10
30
53
12.3K
Paul Butler ری ٹویٹ کیا
Adrian Reid
Adrian Reid@extradryingtime·
@DoctorVive As an environmentalist under permanent surveillance, yes, we are being branded as terrorists for saying solar is a good idea. This planet is beyond stupid
English
2
10
94
1.1K
Paul Butler ری ٹویٹ کیا
Small Town American Media
Small Town American Media@smalltownmedia1·
@atrupar The people fighting for clean water in your town are "terrorists" now. Meanwhile the companies dumping chemicals in your creek get deregulated. Who's actually threatening your family's health here?
English
0
3
21
405
Sam Coates Sky
Sam Coates Sky@SamCoatesSky·
Greater Manchester Police say they have no evidence of family voting after an extensive investigation, including speaking to Democracy Volunteers and seizing CCTV: We’ve concluded our investigation into alleged ‘family voting’ at last month’s Gorton and Denton by-election, finding no evidence of any intent to influence or refrain any person from voting. Our investigation into alleged influencing of voters at a polling booth (under Section 62C Representation of the People Act 1983 (Ballot Secrecy Act 2023)) began after a criminal report from the Reform UK party following a public statement made by independent electoral observers at Democracy Volunteers. We have spoken to the four Democracy Volunteers observers present at polling stations on the day of the by-election (26 February) who have shared with us their eyewitness account. This includes some instances of more than one voter going into a booth at the same time, and instances of people looking over the shoulder of voters. The information they have provided to us estimates this may have happened on 32 occasions across 15 polling stations. The observers do not allege any verbal instruction or physical conduct that indicated one person was directing or coercing another regarding how to vote. This is a crucial part of the legislation to prove such an offence was committed. Our investigation team, led by an experienced senior investigating officer, spoke to all four volunteers from Democracy Volunteers as part of our enquiries – obtaining a copy of their observations. We also spoke to the Presiding Officers at 15 stations as well as the Acting Returning Officer, none of whom received any reports other than from Democracy Volunteers. We have received no further criminal reports. For us to investigate allegations, we require an understanding of who the potential suspects may be, and evidence that may corroborate eyewitness accounts. For an investigation to meet the criminal threshold for prosecution, we require admissible evidence of intent or action aimed at influencing the vote. We have asked Democracy Volunteers for descriptions of those alleged to be involved, and timings on when these are believed to have occurred. These details were not documented by observers or the complainant, and we have not been provided with any identities or descriptions to pursue. The absence of this information means there is no remaining reasonable line of enquiry. This also includes limitations with CCTV as an absence of descriptions, and votes not being time-stamped, meaning we are not able to identify individuals from footage. We have approached all 45 polling stations in the Gorton and Denton constituency to ask for CCTV from the day. Forty-one of those polling stations told us they did not have CCTV activated in the building as it would have compromised the secrecy of the vote during polling day, in line with advice given. We have seized and viewed CCTV from three of the remaining four polling stations. These are three polling station that Democracy Volunteers visited. We have spoken to the Presiding Officer from each one. However, these stations do not show any evidence of anyone directing or coercing another regarding how to vote – the crucial part of the legislation to prove such an offence was committed. There is no evidence to suggest any intent to influence or refrain a person from voting as stated in the Ballot Secrecy Act 2023. We have been liaising with the Electoral Commission, who we have shared our findings with. We have also shared our findings with the Returning Officer. We have updated the complainant about the work of our investigation and the conclusion we have reached.
English
631
740
2.1K
723.6K
Paul Butler ری ٹویٹ کیا
Zack Polanski
Zack Polanski@ZackPolanski·
The morning after Hannah won I was asked time and time again about this. There was no evidence for it. Instead the establishment media fuelled the fire. It was Islamaphobic. And it's because those in power are scared of us ending rip off Britain.
Sam Coates Sky@SamCoatesSky

Greater Manchester Police say they have no evidence of family voting after an extensive investigation, including speaking to Democracy Volunteers and seizing CCTV: We’ve concluded our investigation into alleged ‘family voting’ at last month’s Gorton and Denton by-election, finding no evidence of any intent to influence or refrain any person from voting. Our investigation into alleged influencing of voters at a polling booth (under Section 62C Representation of the People Act 1983 (Ballot Secrecy Act 2023)) began after a criminal report from the Reform UK party following a public statement made by independent electoral observers at Democracy Volunteers. We have spoken to the four Democracy Volunteers observers present at polling stations on the day of the by-election (26 February) who have shared with us their eyewitness account. This includes some instances of more than one voter going into a booth at the same time, and instances of people looking over the shoulder of voters. The information they have provided to us estimates this may have happened on 32 occasions across 15 polling stations. The observers do not allege any verbal instruction or physical conduct that indicated one person was directing or coercing another regarding how to vote. This is a crucial part of the legislation to prove such an offence was committed. Our investigation team, led by an experienced senior investigating officer, spoke to all four volunteers from Democracy Volunteers as part of our enquiries – obtaining a copy of their observations. We also spoke to the Presiding Officers at 15 stations as well as the Acting Returning Officer, none of whom received any reports other than from Democracy Volunteers. We have received no further criminal reports. For us to investigate allegations, we require an understanding of who the potential suspects may be, and evidence that may corroborate eyewitness accounts. For an investigation to meet the criminal threshold for prosecution, we require admissible evidence of intent or action aimed at influencing the vote. We have asked Democracy Volunteers for descriptions of those alleged to be involved, and timings on when these are believed to have occurred. These details were not documented by observers or the complainant, and we have not been provided with any identities or descriptions to pursue. The absence of this information means there is no remaining reasonable line of enquiry. This also includes limitations with CCTV as an absence of descriptions, and votes not being time-stamped, meaning we are not able to identify individuals from footage. We have approached all 45 polling stations in the Gorton and Denton constituency to ask for CCTV from the day. Forty-one of those polling stations told us they did not have CCTV activated in the building as it would have compromised the secrecy of the vote during polling day, in line with advice given. We have seized and viewed CCTV from three of the remaining four polling stations. These are three polling station that Democracy Volunteers visited. We have spoken to the Presiding Officer from each one. However, these stations do not show any evidence of anyone directing or coercing another regarding how to vote – the crucial part of the legislation to prove such an offence was committed. There is no evidence to suggest any intent to influence or refrain a person from voting as stated in the Ballot Secrecy Act 2023. We have been liaising with the Electoral Commission, who we have shared our findings with. We have also shared our findings with the Returning Officer. We have updated the complainant about the work of our investigation and the conclusion we have reached.

English
638
2.3K
11.6K
306.1K
Paul Butler ری ٹویٹ کیا
anyone_want_chips
anyone_want_chips@anyonewantchips·
Trump has 5 kids with 3 women he cheated on. Elon Musk has 14 kids with 4 women he cheated on. Pete Hegseth has 7 kids with 3 women he cheated on. RFK Jr has 7 kids with 3 women he cheated on. The Republican Party protects pedophiles. Family values - my ass.
anyone_want_chips tweet mediaanyone_want_chips tweet mediaanyone_want_chips tweet mediaanyone_want_chips tweet media
English
1.2K
20.3K
57.3K
665.2K
Paul Butler ری ٹویٹ کیا
Garry Kasparov
Garry Kasparov@Kasparov63·
When mail-in voting is limited or eliminated, then selected polling stations are closed or surrounded with "security checks", when poll workers are replaced by ICE "for security", when ballots are confiscated for "fraud", maybe you’ll take it seriously. Too late.
Garry Kasparov@Kasparov63

Anyone who thought creating the largest internal security force in the country, answering only to the president, was for anything else hasn’t been paying attention.

English
692
4.3K
11.2K
350.7K