The Political Crusade

1K posts

The Political Crusade banner
The Political Crusade

The Political Crusade

@PolyCrusader

Welcome to the Crusades.

شامل ہوئے Şubat 2026
85 فالونگ33 فالوورز
The Political Crusade
The Political Crusade@PolyCrusader·
Ah shit, I can't read. My Bad. Its still an overwhelming amount of evidence from that time frame, so the point still stands strong. Doesn't matter though, cause that dumb bitch blocked me. Guess she got tired of getting her ass intellectually whipped. What a cowardly way to admit defeat in a debate. A win is still a win.
English
0
0
1
7
The Political Crusade ری ٹویٹ کیا
poromanul
poromanul@PolPotAliveInUA·
When Jeremy Clarkson dies I will be having a week of mourning that involves drunk driving a busted shitbox and binging classic Top Gear
CoveredGeekly@CoveredGeekly

Jeremy Clarkson reveals he was diagnosed with "aggressive" prostate cancer last summer "If this is all successful, I’ll see you for season six. And if it isn’t, I won’t. Take care, everyone." (via theguardian.com/media/2026/jun…)

English
33
706
14.6K
632.2K
The Political Crusade
The Political Crusade@PolyCrusader·
How could you possibly conclude that any of that is circumstantial? That's the most illogical thing I've ever fucking heard. "I don't believe George Washington ever existed. We have eye witness testimony, evidence he was president, letters, signed documents, America defeated the British, but that's just all circumstantial." What are you even talking about? I understand you don't believe Jesus's claim to be the Son of God. But to say the evidence, history, and context is all circumstantial is intellectually embarrassing. And I fucking don't believe you think that for a second. And sure, almost three hundred years later. That doesn't account for the fact the religion also starts immediately. Nice block. The most cowardly way to admit defeat. Another commie bites the dust.
The Political Crusade tweet mediaThe Political Crusade tweet media
The Political Crusade@PolyCrusader

Which is why you need to study the literacy style, and the historical context. The literacy style is that of eye witness testimony. The historical context is that before words were even put on papyrus, people start worshipping him as Messiah, and Christianity spreads like wildfire, to the point of sever persecution. The apostles all die (except one) horrific deaths, for what they claim to have seen. The dead Jesus, risen from the grave. There were 100s of messianic movements back then. They all died out. But this one didn't. Jews and Romans also wrote about Jesus. The historical evidence is all there.

English
0
0
0
1
The Political Crusade
The Political Crusade@PolyCrusader·
Which is why you need to study the literacy style, and the historical context. The literacy style is that of eye witness testimony. The historical context is that before words were even put on papyrus, people start worshipping him as Messiah, and Christianity spreads like wildfire, to the point of sever persecution. The apostles all die (except one) horrific deaths, for what they claim to have seen. The dead Jesus, risen from the grave. There were 100s of messianic movements back then. They all died out. But this one didn't. Jews and Romans also wrote about Jesus. The historical evidence is all there.
English
1
0
0
11
The Political Crusade
The Political Crusade@PolyCrusader·
Sure, what im saying is other biblical scholars have different theories on this. And even if the markian origin is correct, it's way more complicated than this blanket statement you're making. And the early church does say Mathew was written first. That's just a fact. Whether they are correct or not? I don't know. Then you would still have to explain John. And I highly, highly doubt that. An ancient texts biblical scholar who doesn't understand how historical evidence works? Yeah right.
English
1
0
0
10
The Political Crusade
The Political Crusade@PolyCrusader·
I Literally haven't lied once. You know there are athiest and secular ancient text and biblical scholars, right? They also agree with the legitimacy of these manuscripts. They just don't believe Jesus is God. And thats partially false. John wasn't copied at all, and we don't know if they were copied, and if they were, we don't know from what. The early church father's report is that Mathew is written first, so they could have been copying him. The synoptic problem isn't even a problem. Especially if they're all writing about the same stories they either witnessed or heard. And sure, its possible they were sharing sources. So what?
English
1
0
0
11
milla$
milla$@danielekp0·
@PolyCrusader You are totally right man Pls I’ll appreciate if you follow back thanks
English
1
0
1
7
milla$
milla$@danielekp0·
Who else has watch this anime 🤨
milla$ tweet media
English
32
4
72
1.9K
The Political Crusade
The Political Crusade@PolyCrusader·
Lilliana fucking ruins it for me. I have other issues with it too, like Garfield being cringe as fuck at some moments. Splitting up the cast for their own fights, so now I have to watch two people I don't give a shit about fight the bad guy. But the main issue was Lalliana for sure, though her backstory is pretty good.
English
1
0
0
315
AniTV
AniTV@AniTVOfficial·
'Re:Zero' just broke all barriers with it's latest episode debuting at 10/10 on iMDb with 12K Votes. - Highest Rated TV Series Episode of ALL TIME - First Isekai & Light Novel to Anime Series to achieve this - First to achieve 10/10 in 9 YEARS
AniTV tweet mediaAniTV tweet media
English
156
2.9K
23.2K
776.8K
The Political Crusade
The Political Crusade@PolyCrusader·
So... you don't know how historical evidence works? Cool. The four gospels were originally written in the 1st century, as eye witness testimony. The reason we know this is evidence is because of the incredible amount of copies. Many others, who Jesus preached to, healed, pre and post resurrection, spread all of their stories orally. And yes, claims of Jesus walking around after death were investigated by the pharisees and sadducees. They were never able to provide any evidence to the contrary. And if they could, I guarantee we would know about it. The DSS contain no gnostic manuscripts. Apocryphal and Enochian manuscripts are not gnostic texts. Apocryphal texts were deemed by the councils to be un important and not worth putting in the bible. The enochian texts were removed from most bibles because it was never written by Enoch. The Books of Enoch are considered to be Jewish mythological fanfiction, that show up about 200 hundreds years before Christ. Done by multiple Jewish scholars who were trying to interpret vague texts within Genesis. Gnostic texts show up much later, and all have been proven to be forgeries. Including the ones that influenced Islam.
English
1
0
0
8
Kammyboo
Kammyboo@Kammyboo0·
@AniTVOfficial Dangg I only watched S1, is it worth it to continue watching it?
English
13
0
18
23.6K
Louise ✟🇻🇦
Louise ✟🇻🇦@prolifefrenchie·
Trump is a compromised pedophile.
English
78
6
79
10.7K
The Political Crusade
The Political Crusade@PolyCrusader·
It is. 5000+ Greek manuscripts all dating from the 1st century to the 10th century, all agreeing with each other to an incredible degree. All for a random Jewish carpenter in a time of high illiteracy. Writing was done by a select few, and biographies were reserved for very special people. Alexander the Great has only a few manuscripts, two of them are from his personal propagandists. Not to mention other Jewish and Roman writings at the time talking about Jesus, not in a good light either. For anything 2000 years ago, thats a disgusting amount of historical evidence. It should also be mentioned that Jewish culture wasn't big on writing. Most of the stories in the Bible were taught orally. Which makes the amount of documentation we have even more incredible.
English
2
0
1
20