Project Guiding Light

fayyadreturns@fayyadreturns

75

214

94.9K

Project Guiding Light@ProjectGuiding·27m

قال الإمام ابن جرير الطبري رحمه الله تعالى في تفسيره: ﴿أَمْ أَمِنْتُمْ مَنْ فِي السَّمَاءِ﴾ وهو الله وقال الإمام البغوي رحمه الله تعالى في تفسيره: ثُمَّ خَوَّفَ الْكُفَّارَ فَقَالَ: ﴿أَأَمِنْتُمْ مَنْ فِي السَّمَاءِ﴾ قَالَ ابْنُ عَبَّاسٍ: أَيْ: عَذَابَ مَنْ فِي السَّمَاءِ إِنْ عَصَيْتُمُوهُ

Closing replies doesn’t really help but this doesn’t answer the inconsistency in approach. You will have people from the same group as you using this verse and taking it literally: ءَأَمِنتُم مَّن فِی ٱلسَّمَاۤءِ أَن یَخۡسِفَ بِكُمُ ٱلۡأَرۡضَ فَإِذَا هِیَ تَمُورُ﴿ ١٦ ﴾ Al-Mulk, Ayah 16 So why is there an inconsistency in approaching it? Why take one as being the God of those in the heavens and the earth here and then the above verse take it literally (whatever that means)? The inconsistency in the approach is quite apparent.

العربية

fayyadreturns@fayyadreturns

1

7

237

Project Guiding Light@ProjectGuiding·41m

The level of intellectual discourse by those who claim to champion the Aql, is honestly abysmal. Not sure if he’s straw-manning, or is just ignorant to the fact that the principle of Ahlul Sunnah isn’t to blanket-take every Ayāh that Mentions Allah جل جلاله, literally. It’s to submit to how the righteous Salaf understood them. Not how Jahm bin Safwan and those who followed him understood it. Ironically, he translates في as “in,” even though في has different meanings, depending on the context. The verse is simple: Allah is worshipped within the lands and within the heavens. Imam Ibn Jarir At-Tabari رحمه الله تعالى رحمة واسعة said regarding this Ayah: يقول تعالى ذكره: والله الذي له الألوهة في السماء معبود، وفي الأرض معبود كما هو في السماء معبود، لا شيء سواه تصلح عبادته؛ يقول تعالى ذكره: فأفردوا لمن هذه صفته العبادة، ولا تشركوا به شيئا غيره.

The Qur’an also says He is an Ilah IN the earth (وهو الذي في السماء اله وفي الأرض اله وهو الحكيم العليم). It says both in the heavens and in the earth. So now the question is, if you take one literally and the other not then why is that the case? There should be some form of consistency. Otherwise it is merely picking and choosing and you effectively become like other deviants.

English

ETIDAL | English@etidalorg

2

16

439

Project Guiding Light@ProjectGuiding·16h

Saudi Government entity calling Judaism and Christianity “monotheistic” is Kufr and Shirk by consensus of everyone who’s smelt the scent of Islam. Of course Madkhalis will burry their head in the sand, and ignore it. What a pitiful state of a people, where their deen is “guided” by the foreign policy of a Taghut government. For those who claim this is not a government entity, see below. Anyone who is honest will not hesitate to see the Kufr and Zandaqa of such an evil government. Let alone ascribe it to Salafiyyah.

Respect for the monotheistic religions elevates the value of life and limits hatred and conflict among religions #Etidal #WorldInterfaithHarmonyWeek

English

17

85

3K

Project Guiding Light@ProjectGuiding·22h

@jijgtf Madkhalis:

GIF

Filipino

@OmarJa465199 x.com/projectguiding…

4

73

Project Guiding Light@ProjectGuiding·23h

Was waiting for a Zindīq Madkhali to try and deflect. It’s a non-profit, because it has other Kuffār from outside countries, on its board of directors. It’s still government funded, government founded cesspool of Kufr and Shirk. (See below from various government-linked Saudi outlets, the entity itself, and the UN counter terrorism center). Now the question remains, what’s the Hukm on a government who founds such an entity, funds it, is clearly okay with its mission, and actively promotes it? Don’t be shy.

أمين@ameeniooo

English

7

13

79

6.3K

Project Guiding Light@ProjectGuiding·23h

Fyi.

QME

1

194

Omar Ja@OmarJa465199·23h

@ProjectGuiding Literally says non governmental org

English

0

1

180

Project Guiding Light@ProjectGuiding·23h

@cxliphate No problem akhi, wa Iyyakum.

Indonesia

87

Al-Shāmī@cxliphate·23h

@ProjectGuiding جزاك الله خيرا Thank you for sharing this, I genuinely didn’t know

@cxliphate x.com/projectguiding…

0

83

Project Guiding Light@ProjectGuiding·23h

Was waiting for a Zindīq Madkhali to try and deflect. It’s a non-profit, because it has other Kuffār from outside countries, on its board of directors. It’s still government funded, government founded cesspool of Kufr and Shirk. (See below from various government-linked Saudi outlets, the entity itself, and the UN counter terrorism center). Now the question remains, what’s the Hukm on a government who founds such an entity, funds it, is clearly okay with its mission, and actively promotes it? Don’t be shy.

QME

0

1

143

Al-Shāmī@cxliphate·1d

@ProjectGuiding Brother you’re right, but the account explicitly states it’s a non-governmental organization. This doesn’t change anything concerning the Saudi government but in this particular case, this is not something the government said

English

1

2

260

Project Guiding Light@ProjectGuiding·23h

Fyi.

Was waiting for a Zindīq Madkhali to try and deflect. It’s a non-profit, because it has other Kuffār from outside countries, on its board of directors. It’s still government funded, government founded cesspool of Kufr and Shirk. (See below from various government-linked Saudi outlets, the entity itself, and the UN counter terrorism center). Now the question remains, what’s the Hukm on a government who founds such an entity, funds it, is clearly okay with its mission, and actively promotes it? Don’t be shy.

QST

1

5

1K

Project Guiding Light@ProjectGuiding·2d

1) Your reading comprehension is non existent. 2) The Hadith, if Sahih, isn’t shirk to begin with — so your npc conclusion you slandered I made, is entirely made up on your end with no basis in what I said. 3) The only point of dispute is if it’s Sahih, not whether it’s Shirk. 4) The education system in America clearly failed you.

English

0

38

797

Anti-Tajsim force@Jdxdd1356·2d

@ProjectGuiding @HarounKanj So Imam Ahmad committed shirk not knowing the hadith promoted quburism? Gotca. Now that we have a Wahhabis who can authenticate the hadith, it becomes shirk. You have no honor for your principles. The khawarij who faught Ali(r.a) were better than you.

English

4

0

8

780

Project Guiding Light@ProjectGuiding·3d

The only way to deal with such Zanadiqah, at least online. In person, their prescribed punishment would probably be a bit more colorful.

English

11

9

118

8.2K

Project Guiding Light@ProjectGuiding·2d

According to the Hadith — which is weak — Allah created Angels who were tasked with guiding others who are lost along their travels — and you call them “magic specially gps knowing angels?” The action, if truly attributed to Imam Ahmad, is not correct because the Hadith is weak, not because the necessitation of his action is Shirk — you dimwit. So on that basis, no you shouldn’t. Hard to believe you Zanadiqa are aql over naql when you have zero aql yourselves.

English

4

64

2K

Project Guiding Light@ProjectGuiding·2d

The authenticity of the Hadith is not the premise of the response you dimwit. The premise is that it’s not shirk, since these angels are locally present, alive, and able — since they were tasked with this purpose by Allah, as the narration states. You Mushrikeen will try and fit a square into a circle, if it “justifies” making Duā to other than Allah. Truly a cursed people.

English

3

72

3.1K

Anti-Tajsim force@Jdxdd1356·2d

@ProjectGuiding @HarounKanj Ok cool, can I act like Imam Ahmad and call upon those magic specially gps knowing angels and ask for the way if I'm lost?

English

0

5

768

Anti-Tajsim force@Jdxdd1356·2d

@ProjectGuiding @HarounKanj The authenticity of the hadith makes 0 difference for the fact that Imam Ahmad acted upon it. Takfir him if you have any principles.

English

0

5

1.2K

Project Guiding Light ری ٹویٹ کیا

Brother Unknown@BrotherUnknown0·2d

@HarounKanj @ProjectGuiding How is your Istigatha to Trump coming along?

English

3

27

1.3K

Project Guiding Light@ProjectGuiding·2d

Dear Brother, For those who are harsh/slander the Muslims (dead/alive), Mujahideen or otherwise the lay amongst us, or the Scholars, I’m justifiably harsh with them. As for the Laymen, or anyone who is respectful in their disagreement, I have always been gentle in my discussions with them. When you slander the Muslims, I treat it like you’re slandering my own blood brother and will approach you harshly. That’s always been my approach akhi.

English

2

109

Abel H@AbelH0100·2d

@ProjectGuiding @haqqelberry For example your videos may Allah give barakah in them. I feel like when they are directed towards muslims like the murjiah they are too harsh. If you were to switch and have a dawah mentality then potentially they will have more effect.

English

The Muslim Cowboy@MercifulMessage

0

2

99

Project Guiding Light@ProjectGuiding·6d

The filthy Kafir wanna-be cowboy strikes again, not sufficing himself with calling The Prophet a “non-Muslim prior to the Risālah,” والعياذ بالله. He has doubled down by adding “belying The Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم” to his list of heresies, and likewise belying the applied understanding of the Scholars from the Sahabah رضي الله عنهم. The Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم Said in a clear Hadith: “Whoever changes his religion [from Islam], then unalive him.” [Bukhari 6922] The very next Hadith entry by Imām Al-Bukhari رحمه الله تعالى رحمة واسعة, is an incident where the Noble Sahabi Mu’adh Ibn Jabal applies this Hadith, during The Life of The Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم: “…Then Mu’adh ibn Jabal followed him. When he arrived, Abu Musa laid out a cushion for him and said: ‘Dismount.’ And behold — there was a man beside him, bound in fetters. Mu’adh said: ‘What is this?’ He said: ‘He was a Jew, then he embraced Islam, then he returned to Judaism.’ Abu Musa said: ‘Sit down.’ Mu’adh said: ‘I will not sit down until he is unalived. It is the judgment of Allah and His Messenger’ — three times. So he gave the order, and the man was unalived…” [Bukhari 6923] Again, this Zindiq’s logic is so stupid, it’s not even worth directly responding to. Suffice for the Muslim, is the Hadith of The Messenger, and likewise the applied understanding of The Sahabah, in order to understand it.

If this is true, how come the Prophet ﷺ never killed a single person who apostated during his life? Not one

14

15

114

12.2K

Project Guiding Light@ProjectGuiding·2d

@ZakHu18111965 @abolore12345 @AhmedSheriffdin The fact they think this is a “gotcha” is so pathetic.

@HarounKanj You brain dead Mushrik, how is acting on a weak Hadith, which states that Allah created specific angles that are not All-Hearing, solely for the purpose of guiding travelers, the same as making Duā to dead people? Being a Mushrik is undoubtably tied to being stupid.

English

0

4

234

Zakir_0131@ZakHu18111965·2d

@abolore12345 @AhmedSheriffdin @ProjectGuiding Non-Salafis: "Imam Ahmad was a mushrik (according to your beliefs) because he called upon angels." This question was answered a hundred times. Imam Ahmad was acting upon a hadith which said to call upon angels of the road to guide him to his destination.

English

0

2

129

Project Guiding Light@ProjectGuiding·2d

@HarounKanj You brain dead Mushrik, how is acting on a weak Hadith, which states that Allah created specific angles that are not All-Hearing, solely for the purpose of guiding travelers, the same as making Duā to dead people? Being a Mushrik is undoubtably tied to being stupid.

English

3

7

138

11.8K

Haroun Kanj al-Ikhwani Salafi Ash'ari Sufi Shia@HarounKanj·3d

@ProjectGuiding Why are you defending Shirk, you Shirk loving Jahmi?

English

5

1

69

3.3K

Project Guiding Light ری ٹویٹ کیا

Project Guiding Light@ProjectGuiding·12 Oca

These are the people that @Haqiqatjou is taking guidance from, and recycling centuries old emotional arguements from. May Allah continue to expose this Zindīq. Answer the question, and don’t be a coward: If someone goes to a Buddha statue, and sits next to it and says, “O Buddha, grant me Rizq, or grant me a child (etc),” whilst believing that Allah is The One who facilitates this by giving this Buddha statue the ability to fulfill his request. Is this person labeled a Mushrik, yes or no? If someone were to say yes, is Shaykh Al-Islam Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhāb رحمه الله تعالى رحمة واسعة the one who “innovated” this position? Yes or no. Again, don’t be a coward, and try to name drop @FarisHammadi, who if anything, rivals you in Zandaqa and deviance.

English