Project Guiding Light

"My name is Yahya Mahamid. I'm an Israeli, I'm an Arab, I'm a Muslim, and I am a proud soldier of the Israeli Defense Forces. I grew up taught to hate, but I fell in love in Israel. I'm proud to be a Muslim Israeli soldier." Yahya, you are a light in the darkness. ❤️

It’s reported that Umar Al-Fāruq رضي الله عنه said: Beware of gorging on food, for it induces laziness in prayer, corrupts the body, and bequeaths illness. And indeed Allāh — blessed and exalted be He — detests the fat scholar. Rather, adhere to moderation in your sustenance, for it is closer to rectification, further from extravagance, and stronger for the worship of Allāh. And verily, a servant will not be destroyed until he gives precedence to his desires over his religion. [al-Jūʿ by Ibn Abī al-Dunyā, no. 81] This is about the Muslim, what about the fat Munafiq scholar of the Taghut?

مرحبا ومسهلا بشيخنا 🌹: سالم الطويل حفظه الله

⚠️WARNING: VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED — filthy language and actions⚠️ Now imagine if I were to come out and say look at how the students of Sālih al-Fawzān are, look at how the students of Rabī bin Hādi al-Madkhali are, or Muhammad bin Hādi al-Madkhali, or Raslan, etc. “Look what they teach,” or “look at what their Manhaj teaches or yields,” etc. This would be the epitome of dishonesty. Despite my disagreements with them, and my belief in their creedal violations — I know their manhaj does not include or promote openly being filthy degenerates in such a way. It may include minimizing and distorting the Kufr of Tawali of the Kuffār, it may include concealing the truth, it may include distorting the principles of Emān and Kufr. One thing however, to the best of my knowledge, they do not preach and teach, or support the filthy behavior, as seen in the attached video. In fact, I’d say if such actions were brought before them, they’d rebuke it in the harshest of manners. Allah Says: وَإِذَا قُلۡتُمۡ فَٱعۡدِلُواْ وَلَوۡ كَانَ ذَا قُرۡبَىٰۖ And whenever you give your word (i.e. judge between men or give evidence), say the truth even if a near relative is concerned Being just even against your ideological enemies is important, for if you were the bearer of truth, then the truth is enough of a refutation. If you resort to intentional deceit and slander, then you are following the sunnah of the Kuffar of Quraysh. May Allah guide the sincere ones involved in this slander and deception against our beloved Shaykh Ahmad Musa Jibril حفظه الله تعالى, and if not, make it a means of a painful punishment for them in this Dunya and Ākhirah.

How our beloved Shaykh sees clowns who unleash their misguided tongues on him, with slander.

The Shāfiʿī school has stood firm for nearly 1,300 years transmitted with precision, preserved through chains of knowledge, and carried by scholars across generations.

Khariji makes takfir on Ibn Taymiyyah for the view of udhr bil jahl in shirk, this is what happens when an AMJ watcher stays consistent with his principles

"لا يعذر بذلك من أقام في بلد التوحيد، لا يعذر فيه بالجهل، وما دام بين المسلمين، ليس في فترة من الزمان، ولا في محل بعيد عن أهل الإسلام، بل بين المسلمين لا يعذر في التوحيد، بل متى وقع الشرك منه أخذ به" انظر يا احمق، كيف جعل العذر في الأخذ، وكما يخفى عن ذليل جهلك، ان الأخذ هنا القتل، وهو حكم التكفير. اما تسمية فاعل الشرك بالمشرك، فهذا لاحقا بالفاعل حتى قبل الرسالة، فضلا ان يكون بين اظهر المسلمين.

In a country in which tawheed is known, is the one who makes sujud to a grave excused by ignorance? The author’s answer in summary, this is a matter of difference of opinion/ijtihad among the scholars, some make takfir and some don’t. He takes the opinion of Udhr bil Jahl.

“Udhr bil Jahl in the Hukm of Takfir” 😂 This complete jahil hasn’t read what the author said that such person is hopefully excused by ignorance because he believes in Allah and His Messenger, thus they are still Muslims in his view. Is the author a filthy Murji, yes or no?

حتى تتضح الأمور ويقل الخلاف والجدال العقيم: 1. الذي عليه إخواننا في الأخضر ومن معهم هو أن الشيعة الإمامية مسلمون من أهل القبلة، وهذا هو المعتمد عند علماء المسلمين. 2. كونهم من أهل القبلة لا يعني موافقتهم في بدعهم وانحرافاتهم، ولا فيما ارتكبه ساستهم من جرائم في بلاد إ