KinkyReggae

@insatiablevine What does Miriam webster day 86 means ? Not that. What you morons don't understand it regardless of its definition, its protected speech

Hey Retards. Even Wokepedia disagrees with your conspiracy theory. 🤷‍♀️

@Bubblebathgirl Professor Turley says its a joke and will get dismissed To convict Comey, the Justice Department will have to show that his adolescent picture was a “true threat” under 18 U.S.C. § 871 and § 875(c). It is not.

James Comey indictment counts announced: — Threats Against the President and Successors — Transmitting a Threat in Interstate Commerce AG Todd Blanche isn’t messing around. DOJ wouldn’t have brought these charges without the goods. Comey desperately needs a sympathetic judge. These charges stem from a photo posted by Comey on social media featuring seashells arranged to form “86-47,” which everyone knows was Comey calling for President Trump to be taken out.

@niceblackdude I'm sure they'll be just as dissmissable as the Comey indictment

Alina Habba hints at looming indictments that could come down from the DOJ and any moment. HABBA: “Sit tight because things are coming.”

@SteveStevethe @Itx_judith True, because I've had to read all of your posts proving just how fucking stupid you are

@PunchAssPilot @Itx_judith Does it? You obviously know better than all of us.

Do you support AG Todd Blanche trying to send James Comey to Prison? 1.Yes 2. No 3. Depends on charges

@NQthing2see You only say that because you know the indictment is complete bullshit if it is based upon what you know so far

I’m pretty sure the federal grand jury who decided there’s enough evidence to indict Comey has seen more evidence than the public

Even Professor Turley thinks this indictment is a joke Shell Speech: Why the Second Comey Indictment is Likely to Fail jonathanturley.org/2026/04/29/she…

@pasbless @catturd2 Have someone read the first amendment to you Ask them to go real slow and to define any big words. Clearly you're too stupid to understand

@catturd2 Threatening the President of the United States, either verbally or physically, with death is a crime.

Remember when he thought this was funny? I bet it’s not anymore.

@catturd2 Its still funny, but now we're laughing at Trump's DOJ. This is getting dismissed in the near future

@SteveStevethe @Itx_judith it must hurt to be THIS stupid

@Itx_judith 1. He knew damn well what ‘86’ meant, and with his FBI & CIA connections it became a viable threat. When the just becomes unjust it’s time to make an example of them, so it stops!

@videojewels @Itx_judith It must hurt to be this stupid. This clown show will be dismissed shortly

That Beachcomber of distinction, James Comey, is becoming the beginning of the end of the weaponized justice system that was Barack Hussein Obama’s legacy to the American people. Comey wears his “8647” crown proudly, as he gets charged in court for his ongoing opinion that he wants our President killed. America is done with this loser, but it would be okay to say...

@Itx_judith He's not trying to send Comey to prison. He is trying to convince Trump that he will do ANYTHING trump wants so he gets the AG position. These charges are going to be dismissed real soon

@MikeCBurlew @EricLDaugh He's not going to jail moron.

@EricLDaugh I hope Comey gets a big Bubba friend. A friend to the end.

🚨 BREAKING: Disgraced former FBI Director James Comey just SURRENDERED himself and is under ARREST at the courthouse, due to his charges of threatening President Trump's life LFG! Finally, accountability for the traitor is here! 🔥 The case will be playing out in North Carolina instead of a deep-blue DC area suburb. Prosecute to the fullest extent! "Comey is in the courtroom."

@EricLDaugh @LucaTaner and that's ALL you'll get. Arrests, and charges dismissed. You fucking morons don't understand the constitution

@LucaTaner I voted for arrests!

@EricLDaugh "The Fullest Extent" is Comey getting this dismissed in short time. You clowns will be crying again soon

@Shem_Infinite 🤡

A couple of things. 1) Comey is a criminal, he threatened the Presidents life and he belongs in prison. The evidence was posted for everyone to see. He is guilty. 2) Just because he is charged with that doesn't mean he won't be also be charged with his many other crimes.

@AngelaBelcamino Well you probably feel that way because you have ZERO understanding of First Amendment Jurisprudence

No one is above the law. If Comey made a post that can be interpreted as a threat, he should be held accountable—period. We also need stronger protections so future presidents aren’t targeted through coded messages. Agree?

@Bwalkercox @C__Herridge @Comey Its neither. Don't be so fucking stupid. For one thing, look up "86" in the Webster's dictionary. There are several meanings, none of which is kill. And regardless of its meaning, THIS IS PROTECTED SPEECH" under the first amendment

I wonder how he will defend that. “86ing” someone has been in the vernacular for decades. It has one meaning: “kill”. How does a former director of the FBI argue that he does not know this? How does he argue that such a message is purely “political”, and does not come across as advocating precisely what that message says? It was both a threat, and an incitement.

Consciousness of Guilt Behavior: If the @comey case gets as far as discovery, his contemporaneous texts, emails and other communications will likely reveal his intent and unfiltered response to the public backlash over his Instagram post. Comey took down the Instagram post the same day, claiming he believed "8647" was political speech, not associated with violence.

@C__Herridge @Comey This is getting tossed, and its not going to take long

@JackPosobiec HAHAHAHA

BREAKING ANNOUNCEMENT After discussing with my family and with my legal team I am prepared at this time to fully turn myself into State's Evidence and cooperate in any way with the Department of Justice and testify against James Comey

@Robertus49BC @DefiyantlyFree This is going to get tossed, really quickly. If you think otherwise, you have NO understanding of First Amendment jurisprudence

To put it simply, Comey knew what he was doing. He tried to be cute, too cute by half, and is now going to pay the price. Grok confirms there's been "one major assassination attempt (with some sources describing it as the third overall since 2024), plus other security incidents that were not full assassination attempts" since Comey's "8647" post.

James Comey did not stumble onto a beach and innocently photograph some seashells. He is the former Director of the FBI. He spent decades studying exactly how coded language is used to signal violence against public figures. He led the Bureau through the rise of stochastic terrorism as a national security category. Then he posted “86 47” arranged in sand to hundreds of thousands of followers, with eighty-six being slang for elimination and forty-seven being the sitting President of the United States, who had survived two assassination attempts in the previous twelve months. He took the post down within hours, which is the move of a man who knew exactly what he had communicated and realized he had said it too plainly. Innocent posts do not get deleted within hours. The defense, that he simply did not connect the numbers to violence, is laughable. He was on a national press tour promoting his novel FDR Drive, a thriller about a public figure using coded messaging to incite his followers to commit acts of violence against political enemies. He told NPR the book’s central themes were free speech and “what happens when someone’s words incite violence.” A man cannot be on national radio explaining how coded incitement operates while simultaneously claiming he failed to recognize coded incitement in his own Instagram feed. That is not a coincidence. That is a confession delivered by a defendant who spent eight years building a public career on personal opposition to Donald Trump. The First Amendment is not a magic word. The Supreme Court ruled in Counterman v. Colorado in 2023 that true threats lose protection when the speaker consciously disregards a substantial risk his communication will be read as threatening violence. Comey’s expertise, his audience, his timing, his take-down, and his eight years of documented hostility toward the President all answer that question. He knew. He of all people knew. And in the end, the country needs to face what this case actually is: a former Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation posting a coded call for the removal of a sitting President during an active assassination threat environment, then asking the same Bureau he once led to believe he meant nothing by it. Stop it.