Absolute Darling 🌻 | (scRota)

Sempre estimulo a melhoria, mas acho q é possível também trabalhar em outras portas, se a porta da arte fechar. Mangá incrível com arte feia, é possível? youtube.com/watch?v=ucz5uO…

@miriammartinho tua persistência no ad hominem já revela tua pobreza cognitiva, mais fundada na emoção, pra não dizer histeria. falácia do comentário 1: a de generalização apressada /mentirosa, combinada com um viés de confirmação e uma falsa equivalência.->

@ScarrletEl Você não tem capacidade para entender o que as pessoas escrevem. Imagine saber fazer ironia. Muita comédia. 😏

🧠 🇻🇦 Papa Leão XIV tem QI estimado em 145, formação em matemática e teologia e fala 7 idiomas.

@nrken19 incredible how your conclusion is way more honest compared to some individuals i ve seen recently

More readable article about the new study. “How farming changed us: Ancient DNA reveals natural selection sped up in recent human evolution” phys.org/news/2026-04-f…

isso, os Hispanos eram um dos grandes guerreiros da antiguidade. mas o BR médio prefere endeusar os vikings.

@robertsepehr @SamanthaTaghoy being redhead has nothing to do with blue eyes in those regions...

@SamanthaTaghoy It takes a very low IQ to not be able to grasp that demographics of a given geography can change over thousands of years, especially given wars, migrations, and the Arab slave trade. The Mesopotamian Bronze Age and early civilizations were White, as was Jesus's Davidic bloodline.

Nigéria é incrível mesmo

@al_batalyawsi cabeça de pica

¿Por qué esa obsesión con enlongar los cráneos?

@Aquele_Mesm @MilanBillPaul @Jonnn1Jonn @VidaemOrbita_ @levisback quem não tem útero, não tem opinião. simples

@MilanBillPaul @Jonnn1Jonn @VidaemOrbita_ @levisback A diferença é que tu defende matar por conveniência

"Onde quer que haja adoração a animais, ali haverá sacrifício humano". G. K. Chesterton

@Jonnn1Jonn @VidaemOrbita_ @levisback burro demais

@VidaemOrbita_ @levisback Se matares uma pessoa em coma ou com anestesia, ela tbm n vai sentir dor, é esse o teu argumento patético para justificar o assassinato de seres humanos indefesos?

rivalidade entre as línguas chegou até aqui na América do Sul

se f0der, q capas lindas! #howdowerelationship #GL #yuri

@daydrea1995 produto de soft power. melhor te vacinar hem

@ScarrletEl @seleavril @shakivagal Kkkkkkkkkkkkkkk ué

n entendo essa devoção que brasileiro tem por japonês, se eles soubessem o que o japonês médio pensa de brasileiro...

@seleavril racismo interno todos sabem disso. mas usar o lugar mais fértil para o bolsonarismo não me parece suficiente.

@ScarrletEl @shakivagal @daydrea1995 e esse aqui?

@revenuenexus this is not what the study concludes. plus we don't have data of other groups to compare with.

@doctorveera @Nature @aliakbari23 How embarrassing! Even the most liberal of white liberals are biologically supreme 😂

A new paper in @Nature from David Reich, @aliakbari23 and colleagues breaks the conventional understanding of recent human evolution. The field believed that strong selection in the recent past (~10,000 years) was rare, with few exceptions like the lactase persistence locus. In this paper, the authors challenge that belief, showing that we weren't looking at the problem right. Previous studies that looked for evidence of selection using ancient DNA addressed the problem cross-sectionally, asking if allele frequencies differed across populations more than what one would expect based on genetic drift and migration. Most arrived at the conclusion that population structure primarily explained the observed differences. Here, the authors addressed the problem longitudinally, accounting for when ancient individuals lived by explicitly modeling time as a variable in the analysis. It turns out doing it this way dramatically increases power, increasing the number of genome-wide significant selection signals by 20-fold! Looking at why accounting for the time variable led to such dramatic changes in results, the authors find that previous studies missed so much because selection often happened not on new variants leading to dramatic sweeps (the conventional model: new variant -> selection -> increase in frequency) but on already existing variants driven by transient environmental pressures. Many of these variants underwent reversals, selected up when a pressure existed, then purged when it disappeared or the trade-off cost became dominant. A great example is the TYK2 variant, where an allele boosting immunity was selected for thousands of years because it protected against TB, then got purged as TB endemicity declined and the autoimmune cost took over. The scale of what they found is striking: hundreds of loci showing strong selection in the past 10,000 years with a median selection coefficient of ~0.86%. This number is pretty big in evolutionary terms, meaning allele frequencies have been shifting by ~1% per generation in a consistent direction. Previous selection scans found a maximum of 20 loci, and this one finds hundreds. That isn't an incremental change. It fundamentally reframes our understanding of how common strong selection has been in recent human history. Some of the most striking findings come from polygenic selection, where hundreds of small-effect alleles were pushed in the same direction simultaneously. Polygenic scores based on large-scale GWAS of today predict recent negative selection for traits like body fat, waist circumference and schizophrenia, and positive selection for others like cognitive traits. One important caveat is that GWAS phenotypes are measured in industrialized societies today, and how well they capture what was actually being selected in ancient environments is debatable. For me personally, these findings have direct implications for drug discovery. When using human genetics to find drug targets, we often fixate on the benefit and risk profiles of variants visible today. But we need to be aware that a variant's benefit:harm ratio might be environmentally contingent, and could reverse when the wrong environment manifests. An evolutionary understanding of a variant's association with traits is therefore essential. The same logic applies, perhaps even more urgently, to embryo selection. Selecting embryos based on polygenic traits is humans making permanent, heritable decisions for their offspring with a narrow view of today's environment. The ancient DNA record now shows that cost-benefit landscapes flip over time. So, an embryo carrying man-made selections is carrying those changes into an unpredictable future environment. The broader takeaway is that human evolution didn't freeze in the last 10,000 years. We just lacked the tools and datasets to see its movement. The current findings are based on European populations. I am curious to see these analyses extended to other populations too, like South Asian, East Asian and African populations, which might be holding more surprises to blow our minds. Akbari et al. Nature 2026 nature.com/articles/s4158…

@AvelinoReAu "deus mandou uma pedra pra moisés" isso explica pq viu a sarça ardente, fumou uma

Se a nossa civilização passar por um evento de extinção em massa e sobrarem poucos humanos, boa parte do nosso conhecimentos será perdido. SPOILER: Esse é exatamente o enredo de Foundation, do Isaac Asimov. Bem, não é um spoiler pq o livro tem mais de 70 anos e você já deveria ter lido. Em uns 60 anos, restarão poucos indivíduos capazes de escrever ou entender como computadores funcionam. Desde o silício até a camada de aplicação mais alta. 99,99999% do nosso conhecimento está digitalizado. Agora entendo porque os antigos egípcios escreviam em pedra. E, de certa forma, porque Deus mandou uma pedra pra Moisés e não um computador. Acredito que existiram civilizações antes da nossa com mais tecnologia do que temos hoje, mas não temos muitos registros dessas civilizações exatamente por isto.

@seleavril @shakivagal @daydrea1995 usar Santa Catarina como exemplo é o fim da picada

@shakivagal @daydrea1995 sim, e os brasileiros são anjos que respeitam todo mundo

@shakivagal poder do soft power. mais efetivo que armas

@miriammartinho nunca haverá debates se não há interesse em apreciar o argumento do outro. não aguentou a ironia.

@ScarrletEl Ah, vai se tratar, mané! 🤖sem noção.

Amigos russos e japoneses, Vocês já viram ou ouviram falar de alguma animação brasileira? A distribuição dela chegou aí? Vocês teriam curiosidade ou interesse em assistir nossas obras nacionais???

Con esto de la traducción automática me dí cuenta que los japoneses son insoportables, cómo pueden ser tan moralistas con la historia sangrienta que tienen a cuestas wn ajhsjs