✨Siren✨

23.5K posts

✨Siren✨ banner
✨Siren✨

✨Siren✨

@SirensCallCo

NY Cosplayer | B.S. Chemistry | M.S. Energy Policy and Climate | VA in training | Next Build: C1-10P | Next Con: ???

30 | She/Her | 🇬🇷🇵🇷🇫🇮 شامل ہوئے Aralık 2009
1K فالونگ1K فالوورز
پن کیا گیا ٹویٹ
✨Siren✨
✨Siren✨@SirensCallCo·
✨Pinned Post✨ Welcome Aboard! I’m SirensCallCo, but please call me Siren ❤️ I’m a New York cosplayer, chemist and climate scientist. You can find my current content on 🦋 You can find all of my platforms here; bio.link/sirenscallco
English
0
0
5
1.6K
✨Siren✨ ری ٹویٹ کیا
Donny
Donny@DonnnySins·
Yo doods @PokeTCGAlerts and I are going in together to give everyone another chance at a Switch 2 + Pokopia digital copy! To enter: Like + Retweet Winner chosen 3/28 rolled live for proof (no attendance required). 30 Days of Switchmas continues! Please follow my friend :] ❤️
Donny tweet media
English
732
7.2K
7.8K
213.7K
✨Siren✨
✨Siren✨@SirensCallCo·
@WillowCreativ Ughhhh!!! I wish I was there to see this masterpiece in person 😭❤️✨
English
0
0
1
51
Willow Creative
Willow Creative@WillowCreativ·
Shyvana debut at megacon orlando today 💪
English
19
57
812
8.1K
✨Siren✨
✨Siren✨@SirensCallCo·
I love being a woman in my 30’s
✨Siren✨ tweet media✨Siren✨ tweet media
English
0
0
4
69
✨Siren✨
✨Siren✨@SirensCallCo·
This is me hinting that I knew and could not say anything 😉
English
0
0
2
33
✨Siren✨ ری ٹویٹ کیا
Nicki 🫧🪷
Nicki 🫧🪷@nickimoraa·
Women will literally say 'idk maybe I'm just crazy' right before accurately predicting a sequence of events with 100% psychic precision.
English
79
6.9K
51K
610.1K
✨Siren✨ ری ٹویٹ کیا
Jerome Foster II
Jerome Foster II@JeromeFosterII·
You could watch the news 24/7 & not know that: Our planet is at its hottest in 120,000 years. Methane levels are their highest in MILLIONS of years. CO2 levels their highest in 3 MILLION years. We're in a climate crisis. The Good News: solutions are ready to scale.
Jerome Foster II tweet mediaJerome Foster II tweet media
English
306
213
490
45.5K
✨Siren✨
✨Siren✨@SirensCallCo·
Unconfirmed but- if Evelynn is going to be in the Fall Riftbound set, you bet I’m going to commit to the game then.
English
0
0
1
67
✨Siren✨ ری ٹویٹ کیا
✨Siren✨ ری ٹویٹ کیا
Chris Bataille
Chris Bataille@bataille_chris·
It’s almost like climate science was a … science, with testable and nullifiable hypotheses, not vibes. And that anthropogenic climate change, and its rate and drivers, are actually supported by observed data …
Jerome Foster II@JeromeFosterII

It's very remarkable how well climate predictions from decades ago have held up. Retrospectively comparing future model projections to observations provides a robust test of accuracy. agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.10…

English
71
796
4.2K
55.8K
✨Siren✨ ری ٹویٹ کیا
Sukh Sroay
Sukh Sroay@sukh_saroy·
🚨BREAKING: If you've used ChatGPT for writing or brainstorming in the last 6 months, your creative ability may already be permanently damaged. A controlled experiment just proved the effect doesn't reverse when you stop using it. 3,302 creative ideas. 61 people. 30 days of tracking. Researchers split students into two groups. Half used ChatGPT for creative tasks. Half worked alone. For five days, the ChatGPT group outperformed on every metric. Higher scores. More ideas. Better output. AI was making them better. Then day 7. ChatGPT removed. Every creativity gain vanished overnight. Crashed to baseline. Zero lasting improvement. But that's not the bad part. ChatGPT users' ideas became increasingly identical to each other over time. Same content. Same structure. Same phrasing. The researchers called it homogenization. Everyone using ChatGPT started producing the same ideas wearing different clothes. When ChatGPT was removed, the creativity boost disappeared -- but the homogenization stayed. 30 days later, same result. Their creative range had been permanently compressed. Five days of use. Permanent damage 30 days later. A separate trial confirmed it. 120 students. 45-day surprise test. ChatGPT users scored 57.5%. Traditional learners scored 68.5%. AI reduces cognitive effort. Less effort means weaker encoding. Weaker encoding means less creative raw material. You're not renting a productivity boost. You're financing it with your originality. The interest rate is permanent.
Sukh Sroay tweet media
English
895
4K
15.2K
3.3M
✨Siren✨ ری ٹویٹ کیا
Ewan Morrison
Ewan Morrison@MrEwanMorrison·
Please bookmark this to read. It's important and it exposes how AI companies have been lying to us about the capabilities of AI. AI hallucinations/errors cannot be gotten rid of. The technology has reached its plateau.
Nav Toor@heynavtoor

🚨BREAKING: OpenAI published a paper proving that ChatGPT will always make things up. Not sometimes. Not until the next update. Always. They proved it with math. Even with perfect training data and unlimited computing power, AI models will still confidently tell you things that are completely false. This isn't a bug they're working on. It's baked into how these systems work at a fundamental level. And their own numbers are brutal. OpenAI's o1 reasoning model hallucinates 16% of the time. Their newer o3 model? 33%. Their newest o4-mini? 48%. Nearly half of what their most recent model tells you could be fabricated. The "smarter" models are actually getting worse at telling the truth. Here's why it can't be fixed. Language models work by predicting the next word based on probability. When they hit something uncertain, they don't pause. They don't flag it. They guess. And they guess with complete confidence, because that's exactly what they were trained to do. The researchers looked at the 10 biggest AI benchmarks used to measure how good these models are. 9 out of 10 give the same score for saying "I don't know" as for giving a completely wrong answer: zero points. The entire testing system literally punishes honesty and rewards guessing. So the AI learned the optimal strategy: always guess. Never admit uncertainty. Sound confident even when you're making it up. OpenAI's proposed fix? Have ChatGPT say "I don't know" when it's unsure. Their own math shows this would mean roughly 30% of your questions get no answer. Imagine asking ChatGPT something three times out of ten and getting "I'm not confident enough to respond." Users would leave overnight. So the fix exists, but it would kill the product. This isn't just OpenAI's problem. DeepMind and Tsinghua University independently reached the same conclusion. Three of the world's top AI labs, working separately, all agree: this is permanent. Every time ChatGPT gives you an answer, ask yourself: is this real, or is it just a confident guess?

English
54
2K
6.3K
194.6K