Vinit Pakhale

5K posts

Vinit Pakhale

Vinit Pakhale

@VinitPakhale

.

New York, USA شامل ہوئے Aralık 2017
1.1K فالونگ199 فالوورز
Vinit Pakhale
Vinit Pakhale@VinitPakhale·
@Sidd_tiwari_97 @CowGirlKisser Stop blabbering shit overconfident retard. In Us you need to stop 25 feet behind school bus when it’s stopped and you can’t overtake it. Stop embarrassing us.
English
0
0
2
45
Siddharth Tiwari
Siddharth Tiwari@Sidd_tiwari_97·
@CowGirlKisser We can clearly see it's s mistake of bus driver he stopped his bus in middle of the road which is the main cause of this accident someone lost his life because of him.
English
88
0
46
64.2K
Vinit Pakhale ری ٹویٹ کیا
Vinit Pakhale ری ٹویٹ کیا
jss
jss@jsensarma·
when @ShekharGupta rues that a new 'enlightened' Hindu coalition is needed - he forgets that stalwarts like Tagore, Gandhi, Nehru and many Independence leaders (mostly Hindu) tried precisely this - to build a coalition across religions. And that project largely failed. Tagore in later life, became a critic of Islamic/Christian exclusivism. Instead of unity - a horrific bloody partition resulted which even Gandhi was unable to prevent. Nehru & his dynasty got a fresh start and ~40 years after Independence and that project too has also firmly run aground. A reasonable person would infer, that like the repeated failure of Communism, it was not because the execution of the idea or the people leading it were flawed. But that the idea itself doomed to fail. After all if a genius and an intellectual giant like Tagore could not leave a sustainable legacy of universalism and brotherhood behind, or even as popular and universal a leader as Gandhi prevent the Partition - who else could make these ideas work? IMO - just like Communism was fundamentally incompatible with the natural human greed, the idea of politics agnostic to religion - is fundamentally incompatible with human tribalism - and for the very necessary competition of ideas that is fundamental to how nature and evolution work. *Unless* the people have become largely irreligious or the religions reformed. The presence of unreformed originalist religions with believing masses, still competing with each other for 'souls', cannot allow this kind of politics. That is why today - we are even seeing countries like UK slip into religion based politics. Not because they have a dominant Hindu right - but much more simply because a importing of hordes of Islamist believers has gotten the centuries old 'enlightened' liberal/secular story unstuck. And this is just starting. It is amply clear where the responsibility of failure of Secular politics and Liberalism lies - and unless those who stand for these principles pull their head out of the sand and speak up and point the finger at where it should - no matter how politically incorrect and uncomfortable - religion based politics is here to stay - and to get worse in many other parts of the world.
English
31
250
993
105.9K
Vinit Pakhale ری ٹویٹ کیا
Potatoman, oneday celebrator
He’s okay with Pakistan existing as a religious supremacist state, and he even attended a party for it. He hangs out with Khalistanis who want a Sikhrael. Mamdanis answer is mealy mouthed nonsense.
Ben Burgis@BenBurgis

The question "does Israel have a right to exist?" has only ever been asked in bad faith but "no" falls into the trap. The best answer remains Zohran's last year--"yes" but (replying to the inevitable followup) as a "state of equal rights" not an ethnosupremacist "Jewish state."

English
1
26
211
3.2K
Vinit Pakhale ری ٹویٹ کیا
Derek Thompson
Derek Thompson@DKThomp·
When Lina Khan blocked the Figma-Adobe merger, and Figma later IPO'd‚—making lots of people very rich and even minting a few billionaires in the process—the left praised Khan's policies for creating all that value. Khan herself called it "a win" for investors. But now we're also hearing that wealth is inherently unethical and extractive. So, I guess I'm confused. Is it inherently evil to create billions of dollars of value as part of an enterprise in which you retain equity ownership? Or is it ... sometimes good? Or is it mostly only good when it's downstream of anti-monopoly measures?
Derek Thompson tweet mediaDerek Thompson tweet mediaDerek Thompson tweet mediaDerek Thompson tweet media
English
66
76
1.4K
178.2K
Deva Hazarika
Deva Hazarika@devahaz·
If you happen to introduce a couple or twenty great pals at Anthropic and OpenAI to some other close very rich VC and tech pals who happen to buy a bunch of their stock and then they send you a little thank you wire, that’s certainly not “brokering” or “dealing” anything!
English
18
5
584
48.9K
Vinit Pakhale ری ٹویٹ کیا
Arnav Gupta
Arnav Gupta@championswimmer·
Cloudflare having the most generous and empathetic severance package I have ever seen in a tech layoff so far. Really feeling for those affected. 🧡
Arnav Gupta tweet media
English
12
50
1.4K
111.3K
Vinit Pakhale ری ٹویٹ کیا
Kelsey Piper
Kelsey Piper@KelseyTuoc·
@HalSinger If the Democratic party is too far to the left for Ezra Klein, who is to the left of 80% of the electorate, it will never win an election in the United States again.
English
55
92
2.4K
103.6K
Vinit Pakhale ری ٹویٹ کیا
Ryan Petersen
Ryan Petersen@typesfast·
Financial Times perfectly illustrates our possible futures
Ryan Petersen tweet media
English
168
311
3K
432.6K
Vinit Pakhale ری ٹویٹ کیا
Dr. Shama Mohamed
Dr. Shama Mohamed@drshamamohd·
It did not show Muslims in bad light but Pakistanis in bad light ! Shame on you for confusing the two. People like you spoil the name of Muslims in India. You are most welcome to leave India & take the citizenship of Pakistan
Shoaib ali mohammed@Invisible0904

@drshamamohd How can you post this , this propoganda movie showed muslims in bad light . Shame on you

English
372
868
5K
317.8K