CyberChief

Ladies! You know that when you kiss a frog you get a prince. Ira is an absolute prince! With just a kiss, You can be his princess! Good news is he isn't a frog! You get to skip to the good part! Hit my boy up!

FORGET ALL THE GARBAGE HE SAYS HERE. Listen to him try to breathe. As fucking if this guy runs marathons… …HE CAN’T EVEN RUN UP THE STAIRS. (Everything about him is a fraud wrapped in lies.)

SECRETARY RUBIO: "A country that cannot build ships, or produce medicine, or control immigration, or access vital resources cannot defend its people, cannot defend its interests, and cannot defend its way of life."

"An LA Carol" Vote Spencer Pratt

I’m really not liking this pattern that’s emerging This is one of those rare occasions that Israel 🇮🇱 should tell the United States 🇺🇸 “No.”

UPDATE: Amar al-Sbayi has been removed from the Ontario Solicitor General employee database. The position & phone number that was previously associated to Amar al-Sbayi is marked as "Vacant" on their website. Although not a confirmation, it's most likely he was terminated.

🚨 BREAKING international law development‼️ The current foreign minister of the Islamic Republic of Iran insisted today that the "ceasefire between Iran and the US is unequivocally a ceasefire on all fronts, including in Lebanon." This is a MASSIVE admission that must not go unnoticed because it confirms that widespread popular rhetoric claiming the 🇺🇸 + 🇮🇱 attacks against 🇮🇷 violate international law involving the resort to force has been erroneous all along. Here's why. First off, both @POTUS @realDonaldTrump & @IsraeliPM @netanyahu, as well as their respective governments, have consistently justified Ops Epic Fury & Roaring Lion, respectively, in part because of Iran's direct support for regional proxies such as #Hamas #Hezbollah #Houthis etc. So even if #IRGC had never fired a single rocket @Israel, direct support for terrorist proxies would constitute an adequate legal justification to attack Iran. This is one reason official statements from both 🇺🇸 & 🇮🇱 consistently refer to an "ongoing armed conflict" when explaining the legal basis for such attacks (pic 1, top for an example from 🇮🇱; pic 1, bottom for an example from 🇺🇸). Iran directly supports & controls proxies such as Hezbollah; the nature, duration & intensity of attacks against 🇮🇱 rise to the level of armed conflict; so attacks against 🇮🇷 - whether by 🇮🇱 or 🇺🇸 - involve engaging in an ongoing armed conflict. That's been the consistent position of both 🇺🇸 & 🇮🇱. What about Hezbollah? Do they consider their conflict against 🇮🇱 to be tied directly to the conflict in 🇮🇷? Yes, of course - and they always have. For example, Hezbollah suspended its campaign of attacks directed against 🇮🇱 when a bilateral ceasefire agreement between 🇮🇱 & 🇱🇧 was signed in late Nov 2024. Any guesses what event led Hezbollah to resume attacks against 🇮🇱? That's right! The joint 🇺🇸 🇮🇱 targeting mission early in Ops Epic Fury & Roaring Lion that killed Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Trump announced the death on Truth Social on Feb 28 & Iranian state media confirmed the same later that day. The next day, Hezbollah announced it launched drone & missile attacks directly against 🇮🇱 "in retaliation for the pure blood of the" Ayatollah (pic 2). Fastforward from March 1 to earlier today, and we see messaging from Trump confirming he has talked both to Bibi & Hezbollah. And as Trump summarizes the discussions, "Israel will not attack them (Hezbollah), and they will not attack Israel" (pic 3). Of course, initial reports tonight indicate that arrangement was short-lived. But the broader context of the arrangement was a warning from 🇮🇷 that any ceasefire agreement must cover "all fronts, including in Lebanon" (eg post QTd here). But why is that exactly? The closest straight-line distance between 🇮🇷 & 🇱🇧 is ~440 miles or so. Most personnel & equipment formally assigned to IRGC is positioned in 🇮🇷 - what's left of it, anyway. So why would 🇮🇷 insist that "ceasefire between Iran and the US is unequivocally a ceasefire on all fronts, including in Lebanon." Simple. Because Iran directly controls, supplies, & supports Hezbollah, and Hezbollah is carrying out attacks against Israel as Iran's proxy (geographically) next to Israel. That's how Iran regards the relationship, as this QTd post from the FM explicitly affirms. That's how Hezbollah sees it, since they renewed attacks against Israel "in retaliation for" the death of Ayatollah Khamenei (again, pic 2). And that's what 🇺🇸 & 🇮🇱 have been saying all this time (again, pic 1). This proxy relationship & the resulting legal justification for directing attacks against 🇮🇷 is clear to all the relevant stakeholders, and they've been making decisions & engaging in armed hostilities accordingly. So, is there anyone out there who seems to have ... missed the memo? Absolutely. For starters, every single academic & "international law expert" in the West who has claimed all along that the military campaign by 🇺🇸 & 🇮🇱 against 🇮🇷 violates international law involving the resort to force. Consider, for example, the letter published in April @Just_Security written by @tomdannenbaum @bechamilton @AdHaque110 @oonahathaway @RonaGabor & signed by "over 100 international law experts" expressing "profound concern about serious violations of international law" in relation to the conflict in Iran (pic 4). Now, I have been asked to assist with a critical analysis of the main points raised in this letter as part of a group project the results of which will hopefully be published in the not-so-distant future. So I am thoroughly familiar with this particular publication & can affirm there is actually little it gets right regarding the analysis of international law - despite the seemingly impressive qualifications of many of its contributors & signatories. Even so, for present purposes I will focus just on the jus ad bellum (int'l law involving the resort to force) concerns raised in the letter. As you can see from the attached screenshot, the experts claim, "The strikes launched by the United States and Israel on February 28, 2026 clearly violated the United Nations Charter prohibition on the use of force" (pic 4). After presenting a standard summary of the existing use of force framework reflected in the Charter (a standard summary that should be revisited btw), the authors simply state, "Iran did not attack Israel or the United States" (again, pic 4). Read that statement again. "Iran did not attack Israel or the United States." What do you think about that claim, based on all the evidence presented above? None of the relevant stakeholders seem to agree, yet here are "over 100 international law 'experts'" asserting simply that Iran didn't attack Israel in the lead up to Ops Epic Fury & Roaring Lion. Indeed, if you navigate to the article (justsecurity.org/135423/profess…) & search for keywords like "proxy" or "Hezbollah" or "Hamas" or "October 7", guess how many returns you'll find. That's right. None. Not a single mention of the proxies 🇮🇷 has been using to attack 🇮🇱 since 10/7, and no acknowledgement of the "ongoing armed conflict" justification repeatedly provided by 🇺🇸 and 🇮🇱. The governments of the United States and of Israel get it. Hezbollah gets it. And if it wasn't clear before, it's explicitly understood now - Iran gets it. But an overwhelming majority of "international law experts" throughout the West obviously do not get it. Of course, there is an important discussion to be had regarding why so many "international law experts" don't understand international law as it is actually applied in practice, regarding the longstanding pacifist / progressive ideology that fosters such widespread errors, regarding how public perception is misled - indeed manipulated - in large part because the news media reports on these fallacies since they are purveyed by "experts" & media professionals don't themselves typically know any better, regarding how these widespread misunderstandings artificially erode public support for such operations by erroneously characterizing them as "illegal", regarding how this phenomenon ends up supporting the strategic objectives of our adversaries, and so on. There will be time & opportunity to address these & similar concerns related to the broader context in due course. For now, simply remember this. Iran explicitly considers Lebanon & its terror proxy Hezbollah as a "front" in the current conflict & links any ceasefire agreement in 🇮🇷 directly to that "front" in 🇱🇧. This is consistent with the long-standing understanding of stakeholders such as 🇺🇸 + 🇮🇱 + Hezbollah as well. This is considered a "front" by 🇮🇷 because it directly funds, arms & supports its terror proxy Hezbollah in 🇱🇧 as it attacks 🇮🇱. And as 🇮🇷 explicitly acknowledges, then, this "front" is part of the same ongoing armed conflict both 🇺🇸 & 🇮🇱 have repeatedly cited when providing the international law justification for attacks against 🇮🇷. And for all these reasons, popular allegations by "international law experts" throughout the West that attacks by 🇺🇸 & 🇮🇱 directed against 🇮🇷 "clearly violated the United Nations Charter prohibition on the use of force" are, in a word, false. #TheMoreYouKnow #legaldisinformation

Some ideas become accepted simply because they're repeated often enough. James Sinkinson challenges five hoaxes that shape the Palestinian narrative.

🚨 INSANITY: A 2,000-year-old religious heritage site is being erased before our eyes. At Khirbet Farsin, an ancient Second Temple/Talmudic-era village in northern Samaria, illegal PA-backed agricultural takeover is destroying antiquities, flattening state land, and burying layers of Jewish history under plows, roads, fences, and illegal construction. This site contains a mikveh, burial caves, underground passages, ancient structures, and the preserved memory of Jewish life in Samaria going back thousands of years. And the authorities have allowed the destruction to continue. Regavim has sent an urgent letter demanding immediate enforcement before another piece of our national heritage is lost forever. This is what “facts on the ground” looks like: erasing Jewish history, one archaeological site at a time.

@Tablesalt13 @grok What if she refuses service to a trans person?

.@grok if prostiution becomes fully legalized in Canada and a prostitute refuses service to a minority is she breaking the law?

@joe_warmington *the Prime Minister then appoints an islamist to manage anti-semitism* One can only assume that the control @MarkJCarney the corrupt @Brookfield bankster would like to have is a control that will increase violence against Jews not the opposite.

PM admits the attacks on Jewish Canadians are out of control

@Tablesalt13 "left a bad taste in my mouth".... 😭 For me this video is funny because she obviously learned nothing.

❗️Canadian pro$titute bans Indians and Pakistanis because they ask for a discount ...and they often refuse to shower before services ... are also "very aggressive" because of their "r@pe culture"

Why is Hodan Secondary School in Thornhill, Ontario, one of the most heavily Jewish-populated areas in the world, hosting Ginella Massa to speak to children? Massa has repeatedly posted antisemitic propaganda on X, including the claim (2 days after October 7th) that Israel provoked the October 7th massacre and the false accusation that Israel bombed the Al-Ahli Arab Hospital. It has been established that the hospital explosion was caused by a misfired rocket from Palestinian Islamic Jihad terrorists which was intended to slaughter Jews. This individual should not be allowed anywhere near schools. Contact the school below: 905-660-1397

@EYakoby Beautiful 🤩

BREAKING: With internet partially restored, videos are now trickling out of Iran showing just how badly the mullahs were dominated.

@l_stone He's also one of Mark Carney's ministers in a government that openly welcomes IRGC terrorists into Canada and includes ministers like Omar our new anti-Semitism specialist who is a terrorist supporter himself so frankly this kapo can get hard and feathered with the rest of them.

AI Minister Evan Solomon, whose family has attended the Holy Blossom temple for generations, says we have to be honest about “this urgent and dangerous moment across the country.”

Canada’s downfall was electing Liberals. Under Harper: -We had the richest middle class -The biggest corporate tax cut in history -Entrepreneurship & investment was booming -Life was affordable Now, Liberals are looking to cut benefits from the seniors that elected them

Footage from east Beirut aired on Lebanese media shows a Lebanese Christian raising a glass in support of the IDF: "God willing the IDF reaches Batroun. Our prayers and hearts are with the IDF." The guy isn't scared. @ItayBlumental

No matter how much she cries, don't feed her ego after midnight...

In Canada they will pay for unlimited healthcare benefits for illegal immigrants who have been denied their asylum claims unquestioningly but when you get old after having paid into the system for decades they will insist on cutting your benefits and killing you at the first opportunity. Sodom and Gomorrah levels of depraved.