bitscoop ױ
1.9K posts

bitscoop ױ
@_bitscoop
Life for good !!! Discord: _bitscoop | qubic |


Per diem is killing me @DeFiMomma let me inside the circle ffs 😩 qubic-network:native high-life 🥂





What you describe here is not a scandal, it is a project crossing into reality. The moment a network starts funding developers, moderators, marketing, infrastructure, and governance, you inevitably get budgets, power structures, and internal politics. Not because someone suddenly became “evil”, but because systems cannot scale without them. Every serious blockchain has gone through this: #Bitcoin, #Ethereum, #Solana, all of them now have foundations, treasuries, paid roles, and gatekeepers. Thwy didnt betrayed their ideals, but otherwise they would have stayed irrelevant. So, i personally would not ask: “Why are there paid mods or CCF expenses?” I would rather ask: Are these structures transparent, accountable, and aligned with the long-term health of the network? Criticism of this is healthy and necessary! But pretending a $100M AI compute network can operate like a small anonymous DAO is in real life fantasy. $Qubic is at the exact transition point: from idealistic experiment to real infrastructure. That phase is uncomfortable, but thats where projects either become system-relevant… or disappear. What makes people uncomfortable is not the existence of the CCF or paid roles. It is the lack of transparency around who was paid, for what, and what the deliverables actually were. The @talentnodes situation is a perfect example of why people are asking questions. According to multiple community reports, TalentNodes received a lot of money per month from the CCF, while at the same time secretly working on @amadeusprotocol ?! Now that project is presented as something “new”, even though publicly visible Discord and on-chain traces suggest the server and branding already existed back in january 2023 and that TalentNodes was already more than just involved back then?! That alone does not prove wrongdoing. But it absolutely creates a conflict-of-interest question that the community has a right to ask: • What exactly did TalentNodes deliver for $Qubic for that level of funding? • Where are the reports, milestones, or measurable outputs? • How was Amadeus separated from CCF-funded work? And what makes this worse is that these questions cannot even be discussed in the official Discord, posts get deleted and people get muted or banned for raising them. That kind of moderation does definetely not protect a community, it suppresses accountability. When tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars flow from a community fund into individuals who later launch private projects, transparency is not optional, it is essential!! This is not an attack on CFB or Qubic’s technology. Qubic’s tech is exceptional. But the way how money, visibility, and power are handled, is definetely something what needs to be changed at some point. If everything was clean, publishing the details would only strengthen trust. Silence and moderation instead of transparency does the opposite. These are not hostile questions. They are the questions of people who actually care about $Qubic’s future.












