animixar, phd

3.9K posts

animixar, phd banner
animixar, phd

animixar, phd

@animixar

researcher, artist, tinkerer, investor. building @TaoBotLabs: DeAI x DeFi. no financial advice. tweet/RT are not endorsement. (ττ, 🟧, 🦇🔊)

metaverse شامل ہوئے Haziran 2021
370 فالونگ1.3K فالوورز
animixar, phd
animixar, phd@animixar·
@JosephJacks_ All that it says is you come from money. Formal education is not a choice for most. And not all learning or testing is about memorization either.
English
0
0
0
124
JJ
JJ@JosephJacks_·
I have zero formal training in … anything. I was homeschooled entirely and have no elementary school degree, no college degree, .. and of course no degrees in anything. But that doesn’t explain it clearly — I wasn’t actually tested in ANY memorization based learning. No GED. No SAT. I was never graded on anything as a kid.
Robert Ziman@robziman

@JosephJacks_ Do you have formal physics training? (just curious)

English
25
10
207
26.6K
animixar, phd
animixar, phd@animixar·
.@DarioAmodei is just selling his business here. nothing more. @bittensor $tao solves this elegantly at scale. @dwarkesh_sp should bring @const_reborn on. let's talk about open source app layer. that's what these models will power eventually.
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei on Open-Source AI Models. "I don't think open source works the same way in AI that it has worked in other areas. Primarily because with open source you can see the source code of the model. Here we can't see inside the model, it's often called open weights instead of open source to kind of distinguish that. But a lot of the benefits, which is that many people can work on it and that it's kind of additive, don't quite work in the same way. So I've actually always seen it as a red herring. When I see a new model come out I don't care whether it's open source or not. If we talk about Deep Seek I don't think it mattered that Deep Seek is open source. I think I ask, is it a good model? Is it better than us at the things that matter? That's the only thing that I care about. It actually doesn't matter either way. Because ultimately you have to host it on the cloud. The people who host it on the cloud do inference. These are big models, they're hard to do inference on. When I think about competition I think about which models are good at the tasks that we do. I think open source is actually a red herring. It's not free. You have to run it on inference and someone has to make it fast on inference." --- From 'Alex Kantrowitz' YT channel

English
0
0
3
433
animixar, phd ری ٹویٹ کیا
Ashley
Ashley@AshleyDCan·
I purchased this Taproot Wizards NFT last year for $18,000 today it’s worth $5
Ashley tweet media
English
828
33
1.4K
98.8K
animixar, phd
animixar, phd@animixar·
So, now all $tao mining can be done by agents. Bad news? No - the incentive layers make sure that this becomes a HUGE advantage for #bittensor. Thousands of humans and millions of agents working to produce best intelligence. #Gemini or #OpenAI- ultimately all flows into $TAO
English
0
1
3
150
animixar, phd
animixar, phd@animixar·
@benjamincowen oh Ben, of all the cool engineering you could have done. here you are obsessing on btc price charts. forever. don't you miss science?
English
0
0
0
8
animixar, phd
animixar, phd@animixar·
dear @muneeb , please bring @EricTrump on board to @Stacks advisory board. the world needs $stx to e able to make $btc usable for everyone. best, rekt holder
English
0
0
0
156
animixar, phd
animixar, phd@animixar·
i've been buying the $eth dips for over 4 years and $tao dips for over 1 year now. but all i see are more dips. 🫠
English
0
0
0
84
animixar, phd
animixar, phd@animixar·
@const_reborn @Pop_Collapse the thing about this is: you can say similar things about wtao itself. and it just goes to show how much "trust" people are putting on anon actors without any good third party audits.
English
0
0
0
46
const
const@const_reborn·
Post Mortem: you invested your wTAO into clear ponzi: it was an EVM (not on Bittensor) contract which took your money and leveraged it to buy a subnet token. It wasn’t built on Bittensor. It was built on Ethereum. Subnets on Bittensor can’t be rugged by builders, they can’t have that type of vulnerability. We built it that way to reduce the likelihood of people getting hurt. Turns out the impulse towards ruin for some is extreme. There were multiple people that came into the channel (from the Bittensor community) that told people not to get involved. Multiple times people pointed to the insecurity of the EVM contract. That the team was undoxxed. Multiple times people questioned the nature of the subnet. Those messengers were attacked. The people that attacked them? Investors you cheered on. You didn’t care. Now you’re in the comments of 127 (another financial scheme) egging it on. My guidance: look in the mirror.
English
33
20
260
10.1K
Barbie True Blue
Barbie True Blue@Pop_Collapse·
The fallout from Bittensor $TAO subnet 67 has been deeply disappointing. Not just because of the extreme financial losses, but because of the silence that followed. For many participants like myself, subnet 67 was not a casual experiment - it represented my chance to be apart of the actual permissionless ecosystem as a miner. When the subnet collapsed in a rug pull, the absence of any meaningful communication from the creator (@const_reborn) has been....confusing. Even a post-mortem, explanation, or acknowledgment would have gone a long way toward restoring some measure of trust or closure - at least for those impacted. Equally frustrating has been the lack of visible response from the @opentensor Opentensor Foundation. While it’s understood that OTF is not an enforcement body and does not control subnets, its role as a steward of the ecosystem carries an expectation of leadership during moments like this. Silence during a high-profile failure risks being interpreted as indifference, even if that is not the intent. Permissionless systems necessarily involve risk, and no one expects guarantees. But transparency, communication, and accountability - especially after significant harm - are essential for the long-term credibility of the network, IMO. Without them, participants are left to fill the gaps with speculation, which ultimately damages trust more than the loss itself. If Bittensor $TAO is to continue attracting serious builders and long-term capital, moments like this cannot simply pass without acknowledgment. The community deserves clearer norms around communication, post-incident analysis, and expectations for subnet operators.....particularly when things go wrong. There is a small trusted group of us working tirelessly to gather any and all evidence related to this incident. The amount this small group has been able to uncover so far is astounding. I can barely hold a candle to these guys in regards to their technical expertise. I'm grateful for them - because without them, I'd be all on my own.
fuτileτurtle 🐢@futileturtle

The Bittensor Tenex (SN67) disaster—15,000+ $TAO stolen (> $4M USD). It's not just numbers; real people had their savings devastated. Folks poured blood, sweat, and conviction into earning that TAO, only to feel abandoned after the hack. The silence from @opentensor and @const_reborn is a little disheartening. No postmortem, no explanation on the exploit, no steps to prevent future rugs. How can we trust and build without core team guidance? The community's rallying, but we need accountability and would appreciate some insight from the team at large. x.com/SubnetSummerT/… #Bittensor

English
32
8
51
16.8K
animixar, phd
animixar, phd@animixar·
genuine question: does the ICE helmet say $BTC?
animixar, phd tweet media
English
0
0
0
43
animixar, phd
animixar, phd@animixar·
someone suggested this for their $tao bags. do what you want to do with your bags, but i can't relate with this. i'm infact buying more $tao on monday with this month's wage. 🫡 if you are listening to a TA expert on youtube to sell ur bags, you likely never had high conviction
animixar, phd@animixar

1/3 no one could have predicted the poor perf of the fundamentally strong alts, howmuchever Ben wants to take credit for it. while @benjamincowen happened to be right about holding btc over alts throughout this cylcle, it is imp to remember...

English
0
0
1
117
animixar, phd
animixar, phd@animixar·
3/3 b) he may again be absolutely wrong about 2026 being equivalent to 2019. and if you end up going from your ATL high conviction coins to ATH metals, only u would be responsible for your pf perf. not Ben. he has been happily stacking btc for years with ur subscription fees. :)
English
0
0
0
31
animixar, phd
animixar, phd@animixar·
2/3 a) that he was absolutely wrong about the extended cycle in 2022. and many of his followers got rekt in that narrative and so, PLEASE stop believing these "TA influencers" blindly.
English
1
0
0
28
animixar, phd
animixar, phd@animixar·
1/3 no one could have predicted the poor perf of the fundamentally strong alts, howmuchever Ben wants to take credit for it. while @benjamincowen happened to be right about holding btc over alts throughout this cylcle, it is imp to remember...
English
1
0
0
169
animixar, phd
animixar, phd@animixar·
pumpfun casino on @solana, @MustStopMurad's army of meme coiners and @realDonaldTrump's $trump and $melania destroyed the crypto imho. everyone doing max extraction for themselves. and giving fs about the ethos.
English
1
0
0
94