Away

6.7K posts

Away banner
Away

Away

@avyzan

110/111

09 Jumādā al-ʾAwwal شامل ہوئے Nisan 2012
132 فالونگ173 فالوورز
پن کیا گیا ٹویٹ
Away
Away@avyzan·
KUFR OF SALAR 🧵 This thread will explore the KUFR of this mentally ill person who is raised by scummy parents I think. Part I: Lies about Islam. Intentionally lies about Islam to ‘ragebait’ Indians.
Away tweet mediaAway tweet media
kaetijj@_kaetijj

Haye haye su chu mae lakut boyi Cxe Kyo gayi

English
3
3
10
8.7K
Away
Away@avyzan·
@quirkyophelia this is only problematic if someone is a prude.
English
0
0
0
7
monadarling_
monadarling_@quirkyophelia·
A great writer once said: Men read basic decency as sexual intent, because they themselves wouldn't offer kindness to a woman unless they were hoping to get into her pants.
English
4
1
15
644
Away ری ٹویٹ کیا
حمزة الحنفي
حمزة الحنفي@paleohanafi·
anyone who says child marriage is disgusting has left islam, and upon him is the curse of allāh
English
0
2
3
73
Away ری ٹویٹ کیا
jordan academia
jordan academia@JordanAcademia0·
I'm unsure why everyone is not only repeating an obviously inauthentic hadith by both Western and traditional scholars. The misinformation being spammed is baffling. Also known as "al-Zutt". (1) The hadith itself is genuinely weak, according to traditional Muslim scholars. (2) Even if it says 'sahih', the hadith itself has nothing sexual about it. The verb used is also used in Q72:19 without any implication of sexual activity (from @Rurouni_Phoenix). The verb is probably closer to "clinging onto", similar to when Jacob wrestled with God (Gen 33:22-32). The verb itself in some versions of the story actually mean "followed him" like Al Buhayqi it says "فازدحموا عليه". 𝐲𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐚𝐛𝐮̄𝐧𝐚 simply has no sexual meaning to it. (3) Nobody, not even before the year 2000 likely viewed this hadith in any sexual connotation. John of Damascus, nor any opponents used this hadith as a criticism of Muhammad, or Islam for that matter. If the hadith originally had a sexual connotation to it, then we would likely see some form of polemics attached to this hadith, but we don't. The idea of 'al-Zutt' being a sexual scandal is a 21st century fictional product. (4) Several verses, both in hadith & the Qur'an explicitly punish sodomy. That automatically makes any sexual interpretation of the story to be illogical. Virtually all tafsirs, and all Muslim scholars prohibited sodomy. What differed was what the punishment would be (burning, crucifixion, etc, see: Tafsīr al-Qurṭubī: 7/243 or Tanbīh al-Ghāfilīn, p. 142). (5) If this story had a sexual meaning to it, then we would see Muslims attempt to hide it or distort it. But no Muslim ever viewed it as embarrassing or attempted to hide it, probably because it was never meant to be sexual to begin with. (6) There's no evidence of (a) Arabs knowing the concept of 'Sindh' people(s), (b) or any evidence of people from the Sindh region inhabiting the Hijaz region, or (c) any motive for Sindh people(s) to even come to the Hijaz region to begin with by 630 C.E. It all, clearly makes no sense. (7) The idea of "al-Zutt" or Sindh people(s) arriving to hadith probably come just a decade after Muhammad's death, where the Rashidun caliphate attacked the Rai dynasty of Sindh in present day Pakistan. (8) The original story isn't meant to be about any actual people(s) but about Jinn. Q72:1-19 and Q46:29-32 have the story about a group of jinn listening to Muhammad recite the Qur'an. Virtually most hadith except a couple all agree that it was about 'Jinn', not some people from Sindh.
jordan academia tweet mediajordan academia tweet media
Alex Jones@RealAlexJones

MAJOR HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT: Researchers Have Discovered The Source Of The Prophet Muhammad's Super Human Strength! According To Holy Islamic Writings, The Prophet Muhammad Received A Powerful Injection From 30 Black Men That Gave Him The Strength Of 30 Men! 🔴WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM HERE: x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

English
10
26
139
7.7K
Cloudburstinggg
Cloudburstinggg@Cloudburstinggg·
I did so much backbiting with my best friend of this one Ktwitter user . Jitna bura bol skte thai bol diyaaa .
English
4
0
11
506
Aftab Ahmad Siddiqui
Aftab Ahmad Siddiqui@UrHanafi_mutual·
Well Nafderlin, we are still waiting for you to share the links of these "videos". Or is it justified to call you ‘Nafi al-Kadhāb’ from now on, since the label suits someone like you who doesn’t retract, admit their mistakes/lies, or apologize for them?
Aftab Ahmad Siddiqui tweet mediaAftab Ahmad Siddiqui tweet media
Nafderlin@mobiusdisk

Anyone: “So I was having a banana…” Barelvis: “May Allah curse you and your entire lineage should you lie upon the greatest of Imams, the logician, theologian, Mujaddid, Mufakkir, Mufassir, Muhaddith, economist, mathematician, physicist, chemist, Shaykh al-Islam Ahmad Rida Khan.

English
6
3
25
1K
Away
Away@avyzan·
@ladyyhahahaha you're right, it's very easy. im not joking. that's why good men are cautious and don't give women complete freedom the same as a man.
English
0
0
0
40
م🦢
م🦢@ladyyhahahaha·
It was fine until I saw the word “manipulate.” You’re a man whether a woman is intelligent or not,men still manage to manipulate her. It’s not exactly rocket science for you guys.
English
1
0
3
495
Away
Away@avyzan·
@nyatsot I'll find something.
English
0
0
0
12
Away
Away@avyzan·
Why is there a trend among some Kashmiri girls to put the cross ✝️ necklace around their neck. What is this trend ?
English
3
0
5
178
Sina
Sina@Bluehopium·
@avyzan @adrift_mp3 LGBTQ+ people are the last freedom fighters of Balestine.. have some decency to recognize them as the true allies of Muslims
English
1
0
0
14
Away
Away@avyzan·
@adrift_mp3 How does it feel knowing that your homeland is ruled by low iq muslims? We don't need to know about the history of losers.
English
1
0
0
28
🦔
🦔@adrift_mp3·
@avyzan You're a muslim so ur iq is extremely low. Being illiterate is a virtue in islam, just like that pedo. That's the way to keep their slaves chained to this violent religion. But I still suggest that you read a history book because iran's culture precedes islam by at least 2000 yrs
English
1
0
0
31
Away
Away@avyzan·
@adrift_mp3 There was no Arab Colonisation. Muslims conquered your land and made it part of the Islamic Empire. You can either be thankful that they allowed you to be part of them or take pride in being a loser forever.
English
1
0
0
31
🦔
🦔@adrift_mp3·
@avyzan Trigger? On the contraty you can trigger people by calling arab colonization, arab colonization
English
1
0
0
33
Away
Away@avyzan·
@Bluehopium @adrift_mp3 I thought you loved LGBTQ+? why are you using f4ggi as an insult? 😭😭😭
English
1
0
0
26
Sina
Sina@Bluehopium·
@avyzan @adrift_mp3 I know.. you’re sick. Try telling these to liberals and LGBTQ+ people, since they seems to be the only ones who still didn’t realize the true nature of Islam
English
1
0
0
20
Sina
Sina@Bluehopium·
@avyzan @adrift_mp3 Yeah people everywhere hate Islam so that’s normal…
English
1
0
0
22
Away
Away@avyzan·
@Adam1_2_ don't expose me 💔💔💔
English
1
0
0
232
Away
Away@avyzan·
@Its_KimWexler @adrift_mp3 Colonization didn't exist during that time. I don't need to read a book to know that. Colonisation is a modern phenomenon. Muslims never colonised anywhere. They conquered and defeated the people and made them part of their empire.
English
1
0
0
7
Away
Away@avyzan·
@Its_KimWexler @adrift_mp3 Mad about what. I'm not Iranian. Idc what happens there. I don't even like Shia. You are just in your own bubble.
English
1
0
0
4
الحنفى Thīīnkēr
الحنفى Thīīnkēr@Stillyourbhai·
@avyzan I asked same question once, got blocked by lot of k twitter "men", almost landed in. Jail😭👍🏻
English
1
0
1
10