BridgeMind

1.7K posts

BridgeMind banner
BridgeMind

BridgeMind

@bridgemindai

Build the future. Over 55,000 on YouTube. Join the fastest growing Vibe Coding community on the internet: https://t.co/wPvrAeqHmM

شامل ہوئے Mart 2024
15 فالونگ23.5K فالوورز
پن کیا گیا ٹویٹ
BridgeMind
BridgeMind@bridgemindai·
BridgeVoice is here 🔥 Voice-to-text for vibe coding: - Instant on-device Whisper (private, offline) - Cloud mode: 100+ languages - Custom dictionary & instructions for perfect prompts I've used it for 63k+ words. Watch the demo. 50% off first 3 months BridgeMind Pro: BRIDGEVOICEFOUNDER → bridgemind.ai Voice > typing? Reply yes/no 👇
English
11
7
59
114.4K
BridgeMind
BridgeMind@bridgemindai·
Open source models are catching up faster than anyone expected. MiniMax M2.7 hallucination rate: 34%. MiniMax M2.5 was 89%. 55 point drop in a single generation. Out of 423 models on AA-Omniscience. M2.5 hallucinated at the same level as GPT 5.4. M2.7 just leapfrogged GPT 5.4. The gap between open source and closed source is shrinking every month. The frontier labs should be paying attention.
BridgeMind tweet media
English
4
11
129
6K
BridgeMind
BridgeMind@bridgemindai·
@DragonStacker Yea you are totally right. Didn’t think about it like that,
English
0
0
0
224
Torch Bearer
Torch Bearer@DragonStacker·
@bridgemindai They have to because the model companies are trying to become IDE companies. They have no choice and whomever foresaw this at Cursor a year ago is worth every penny, and whomever executed so well in that time frame needs a raise.
English
1
0
1
261
BridgeMind
BridgeMind@bridgemindai·
Composer 2 outperforms Claude Opus 4.6 Composer 2 scores 61.7 on Terminal-Bench 2.0. Claude Opus 4.6 at 58.0. $0.50/M input. $2.50/M output. 10x cheaper than Claude Opus 4.6. Cursor isn't just an IDE anymore. They're training their own models now. The IDE companies are becoming model companies.
BridgeMind tweet media
English
19
3
99
5K
BridgeMind ری ٹویٹ کیا
Matthew Miller
Matthew Miller@matthewmillerai·
This is how I vibe code now. 5 Claude Code instances running Claude Opus 4.6 in parallel. All inside BridgeSpace. BridgeVoice in the corner taking voice commands. Building a vibe coding platform using my own vibe coding platform. That's the whole point. If I wouldn't use it, I wouldn't ship it.
Matthew Miller tweet media
English
9
2
26
2K
BridgeMind
BridgeMind@bridgemindai·
BridgeMind is about to hit $48k ARR Insane
BridgeMind tweet media
English
7
2
31
893
DreW
DreW@devteamdrew·
@bridgemindai This is massive, huge congrats! Hockey stick activated
English
1
0
1
83
BridgeMind
BridgeMind@bridgemindai·
After 150 days of vibe coding an app until I make $1M... BridgeMind is about to cross $4k MRR Hockey stick growth activated
BridgeMind tweet media
English
11
1
29
2.4K
BridgeMind
BridgeMind@bridgemindai·
@elonmusk when can we expect Grok CLI? Grok 4.20 Beta is a solid model. #9 on BridgeBench. 93.4 overall. But that's not what vibe coders are waiting for. We need Grok CLI. Claude Code has Claude Opus 4.6. Gemini has Gemini CLI. OpenAI has Codex CLI with GPT 5.3 Codex. xAI is the only frontier lab without a CLI tool for agentic coding. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent already sits at #1 on BridgeBench. Put that in a terminal and it's over.
BridgeMind tweet media
English
5
1
21
1.2K
BridgeMind
BridgeMind@bridgemindai·
@webdevamin Appreciate that. Real-world testing over marketing hype every time.
English
1
0
0
358
BridgeMind
BridgeMind@bridgemindai·
Just cancelled my $250/month Google AI Ultra subscription. Gemini 3.1 Pro is inconsistent. Gemini CLI crashes mid-session. Antigravity loses context on complex tasks. $250/month for a model I can't rely on. Not worth it. Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT 5.4 stay on the stack. Gemini doesn't.
BridgeMind tweet media
English
120
35
733
42.2K
BridgeMind
BridgeMind@bridgemindai·
@Kailzer Reliability is the actual benchmark. Well said. No one cares about scores if it crashes in production.
English
0
0
0
558
Kailzer
Kailzer@Kailzer·
benchmarks dont matter if the thing crashes when youre in the middle of something. been building with all three and google is always the one that makes me switch tools halfway through. reliability is the actual benchmark nobody tracks
English
1
0
2
699
BridgeMind
BridgeMind@bridgemindai·
@JackedBasedMgr Claude has been solid. The rate limits are the only downside but at least it works when you need it.
English
0
0
1
299
BridgeMind
BridgeMind@bridgemindai·
@altf4andrei Hope so. But improvements need to be consistent, not just occasional good days.
English
0
0
1
350
Andrei
Andrei@altf4andrei·
@bridgemindai Understandable, it is a shit show. but i'm seeing improvements this week.
English
1
0
1
459
BridgeMind
BridgeMind@bridgemindai·
@savaerx Nailed it. Failing on complex tasks is the worst possible failure mode for a premium tool.
English
0
0
2
676
Savaer
Savaer@savaerx·
@bridgemindai cli crashes you restart. context loss mid-task is where it actually breaks. antigravity dropping on complex tasks means it fails exactly when you need it most.
English
1
0
3
890
BridgeMind
BridgeMind@bridgemindai·
Google won't refund a single dollar on my $250/month AI Ultra subscription. I paid for what I thought was a reliable, premium AI product. Gemini 3.1 Pro ranked #22 on BridgeBench. Gemini CLI crashes mid-session. Antigravity can't hold context. $250/month and they won't even prorate a refund. Just "subscription ends April 12." No refunds on a product that doesn't deliver is insane.
BridgeMind tweet media
English
58
13
318
23.7K
BridgeMind
BridgeMind@bridgemindai·
@BrosnanHoban That's the perfect way to describe it. Brilliant on benchmarks, unreliable in practice.
English
0
1
9
1.6K
Brosnan Hoban
Brosnan Hoban@BrosnanHoban·
@bridgemindai Gemini's like a moody genius brilliant until it ghosts you mid-sentence.
English
2
1
25
1.8K
BridgeMind
BridgeMind@bridgemindai·
@pranaV__790 They need to hear it from paying customers. Backlash is the only thing that drives change.
English
0
0
1
595
pranav_👾
pranav_👾@pranaV__790·
@bridgemindai A lot of backlash, I hope they finally listen and do something about it.
English
1
0
2
668
BridgeMind
BridgeMind@bridgemindai·
GPT 5.4 Mini completes BridgeBench tasks in 3.4 seconds. GPT 5.4 takes 704.4 seconds. 207x faster. 100% completion rate. Overall score 94.8 vs 95.5. 0.7 points of intelligence lost for a 207x speed increase. Ranked #6 overall. Ahead of GPT 5.3 Codex. Ahead of Grok 4.20 Beta. OpenAI got the mini model right this time. bridgemind.ai/bridgebench
BridgeMind tweet media
English
15
3
101
6.1K