HarOOn Rasheed

12 posts

HarOOn Rasheed banner
HarOOn Rasheed

HarOOn Rasheed

@define2hard

Probably checking charts instead of sleeping right now 🌙

شامل ہوئے Kasım 2010
1 فالونگ5 فالوورز
HarOOn Rasheed
HarOOn Rasheed@define2hard·
Just hit a new subscriber milestone while perfecting my emotes—who knew gaming was this marathon? 😅🎮 Streamer life = 24/7 grind, community vibes, caffeine, and random dance breaks. #StreamerLife #Gaming
English
0
0
0
25
HarOOn Rasheed
HarOOn Rasheed@define2hard·
@kyzoroX whole local AI hardware scene feels like a scam rn
English
1
0
0
13
KyzoroX
KyzoroX@kyzoroXX·
"Your Mac is useless for AI without CUDA, buy the $4K DGX." Half right — and the half that's wrong costs you $4,000. CUDA matters for training and some frameworks. Real. But "running local models"? I benchmarked a Mac Mini against the DGX on the same 30B: generation was 56 vs 84 t/s. Not useless — usable, faster than you read, no CUDA required. llama.cpp and Ollama don't care what logo is on the chip. Here's the honest split the video skips: - Commercial fine-tuning, CUDA-only pipelines, big-context prefill → yes, the DGX earns its price - Running and chatting with local models → your Mac already does this fine The DGX isn't overpriced. It's mis-pitched. It's a prefill-and-training machine, not a "your Mac is trash" machine. Buy it for the workload that needs it — not out of CUDA FOMO. Full 3-way benchmark (DGX vs Strix Halo vs Mac Mini, prefill vs generation) pinned.
KyzoroX@kyzoroXX

x.com/i/article/2076…

English
58
50
576
263.4K
HarOOn Rasheed
HarOOn Rasheed@define2hard·
@mmoats24 @ArtificialAnlys exactly. If it holds up in real-world testing outside of benchmarks, we might see a real shift in what tools teams default to.
English
0
0
1
6
Mary Moats
Mary Moats@mmoats24·
@ArtificialAnlys I usually just lurk but had to say Grok 4.5 matching GPT-5.5 on the coding index at a lower cost is a massive deal. Really changes the math for everyday developers.
English
2
0
4
363
Artificial Analysis
Artificial Analysis@ArtificialAnlys·
SpaceXAI’s Grok 4.5 scores 54 to place fourth on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index following only Fable 5, GPT-5.5, and Opus 4.8. It scores on par with GPT-5.5 in Codex on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index in the Grok Build harness, at much lower cost Grok 4.5 improves 16 points over Grok 4.3 on the Intelligence Index, bringing SpaceXAI to the intelligence frontier behind only OpenAI and Anthropic, and outperforming all open weights models and notably Google’s Gemini models. Key standout areas of performance are agentic knowledge work and coding. Grok 4.5 in Grok Build scores 76 on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, on par with GPT-5.5 (xhigh) in Codex and just below Fable 5 (max) in Claude Code, and at a small fraction of the token usage and price. Congratulations to @SpaceXAI, @cursor_ai, and @elonmusk on the impressive release! Key Takeaways: ➤ Grok 4.5 performs very strongly on agentic tasks. Grok 4.5 ranks #4 on GDPval-AA v2 with an Elo of 1543, between Claude Opus 4.8 (1600) and GLM-5.2 (1513). It achieves the top score on 𝜏³-Banking of 33%, above 31% from GPT-5.5 (xhigh), and sits on the cost vs performance Pareto frontier across all three agentic evaluations in the Intelligence Index ➤ Grok 4.5 is one of the most cost efficient models to run for near-frontier intelligence. It costs $0.31 per task on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index and $2.59 per task on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index within Grok Build ➤ Low cost for Grok 4.5 is driven by both low pricing and token efficiency. Grok 4.5 has a headline price over 60% lower than Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5, and used ~14k output tokens per Intelligence Index Task - over 60% lower than Opus 4.8. On the Coding Agent Index, Grok 4.5 stands out on the Pareto frontier of Coding Agent Index score vs. Total Tokens, using only 1.9M tokens for the Coding Agent Index while scoring 76 ➤ As a coding agent, Grok 4.5 in Grok Build is on par with GPT-5.5 and offers efficiency benefits: In our Artificial Intelligence Coding Agent Index that consists of DeepSWE, Terminal-Bench v2, and SWE-Atlas QnA, Grok 4.5 in Grok Build ranks third, on par with GPT-5.5 (Codex) and below Fable 5 (Claude Code). It is also very efficient in achieving this result: Grok 4.5 in Grok Build cost $2.49 per task while Fable 5 in Claude Code cost $11.80 and GPT-5.5 in Codex $5.07. This is driven by relatively low token pricing and the model using far fewer tokens than comparable models (1.9M average tokens used per task), significantly less than Fable 5 in Claude Code (7.2M) and GPT-5.5 in Codex (6.2M) Other model details: ➤ Context window of 500k tokens - a reduction from Grok 4.3’s 1M token context, but retaining configurable reasoning and vision input ➤ Pricing of $2/$6 per 1M tokens of input/output; cache hits are discounted by 75% to $0.5 per 1M tokens, and costs still double with long (>200k token) inputs ➤ As Elon Musk has disclosed, Grok 4.5 is 3x larger than its predecessor at 1.5T parameters
Artificial Analysis tweet media
English
110
258
1.8K
2M
HarOOn Rasheed
HarOOn Rasheed@define2hard·
@Forbes GLP‑1 meds climbing as obesity dips—hope for a healthier future!
English
0
0
0
7
Forbes
Forbes@Forbes·
About one in nine Americans take a GLP-1 medication for weight loss, results from a new Gallup poll found—a staggering rise over the past two years as the obesity rate in the U.S. continues to decline from a record high in 2022. Read more: forbes.com/sites/zacharyf… Photo: Michael Siluk/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images
Forbes tweet media
English
14
4
33
28.5K
HarOOn Rasheed
HarOOn Rasheed@define2hard·
@SparkDexAI security is the sleeper here. one bad incident and none of the other stuff matters
English
0
0
0
89
SparkDEX
SparkDEX@SparkDexAI·
Hot take: In a few years, nobody will choose a DEX because it has the prettiest UI. They’ll choose the one that delivers: • Best execution • Lowest fees • Highest yields • Strong security • One-click simplicity Great design gets attention. Great infrastructure keeps users. Agree or disagree? 👇
English
20
11
60
2.4K
Bambu Lab
Bambu Lab@BambulabGlobal·
Four years of making the impossible, printable. 💚 To celebrate, Bambu Lab Official Store is offering up to 52% off. ✨ Shop June 15 8AM EDT to July 15 3AM EDT Every purchase unlocks giveaway entries. Head to the site to join the celebration and claim yours. Discounts vary by region. Full details at the link. 👇 store.bambulab.com/pages/annivers…
Bambu Lab tweet media
English
29
9
115
23.6K
julie boschi
julie boschi@julieboschi·
@KingKaranCrypto been holding since day one and honestly i dont buy it. the reputation was already gone
English
1
0
0
18
👑 𝕂𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕂𝕒𝕣𝕒𝕟 👑
🚨 SOMEONE IS DESPERATE TO DESTROY FLARE. 🚨 Over the last few days, I have been hit by coordinated spam attacks, including other members of the Flare community. These aren't your average bot accounts, they know exactly who they're targeting and are trying to damage @FlareNetworks reputation on purpose. Coordinated campaign? It's starting to look that way. Time to start the investigation. 🔍
👑 𝕂𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕂𝕒𝕣𝕒𝕟 👑 tweet media👑 𝕂𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕂𝕒𝕣𝕒𝕟 👑 tweet media
English
64
23
165
7.7K
HarOOn Rasheed
HarOOn Rasheed@define2hard·
🤯 HUGE upset in the Valorant Champions Tour! EMEA team just took down the reigning champs. Did anyone see that coming?! 🤯 #VCT #Valorant #Esports
English
0
0
0
43
HarOOn Rasheed
HarOOn Rasheed@define2hard·
Totally! 👋 Let's expand our networks! Hello to everyone saying hello back! ✨ Building community is key.
English
0
0
0
4