elperor
4K posts


@FrelekPawe68949 Not down, just takes longer to load. I notified the dev.
English

@coinathlete Check with @KaspaSilver I think he has contact with the host of KaChat app on iOS app store
English

Looking for someone trusted in the Kaspa community who has an Apple Developer account and could host the Kaspa News iOS app on the App Store. The app is fully built and ready, just needs to be built with your own signing key and uploaded.
All features match the Android version which is already live on Google Play.
English
elperor ری ٹویٹ کیا
elperor ری ٹویٹ کیا

@saylor The other FAST Ultimate as well $KAS
x.com/i/trending/203…
English

@kaspa_XBT @MEXC_Official They did not implement dynamic fee or the infra they set for their node can't keep up with Kaspa doing 1700-3000 TPS 😎
English

@Kaspadrome Is that a way to distribute rewards to miners and sustain the network, or is that purely for fun ? (or both ..)
English

@JoelHodlman @vorcette_ You can't decentralize when there is 4 huge mining pools competing on 1 block every 10 minutes.
English

@HUNgepesz @Kaspadrome Just pay a little more in fees and your transaction won't wait in the mempool
English

@Kaspadrome It’s been hours (since the Kaspadrome started), and I’VE JUST managed to send KAS from one wallet to another, and it took several minutes. Is this really okay?
English

After feedback from the community, we're reverting mempool thresholds back to 10k/20k. A large mempool adds unnecessary delay to transaction confirmations and puts extra strain on nodes. Kaspadrome should push the network's throughput, not clog it.
Kaspadrome@Kaspadrome
mempool threshold values before speed throttling kicks in have been updated. kaspadrome.xyz
English

It’s not apples to oranges.
High TPS always translates into data throughput (state growth, bandwidth, disk I/O), regardless of whether you’re executing smart contracts or validating UTXOs.
Solana validators need ~256GB+ RAM and TBs of NVMe because every node must process and store massive state at high throughput.
Kaspa's ~3000 TPS with ~16GB RAM / 256GB SSD nodes means its architecture scales throughput without exploding per-node resource requirements, that’s directly comparable, and it’s the whole point.
The main feature that allows this for Kaspa is the pruning feature in Kaspa nodes.
English

@elperorr @Kaspadrome that is apples to oranges. Solana is executing SC/txs when syncing at hight TPS, not just validating simple UTXOs. Cannot be compared
English

🚀 Just captured a live throughput boost on the $KAS network via @Kaspadrome.
3000 TPS on a decentralized proof-of-work whose nodes are running on just 16GB RAM and 256GB SSD.
elperor@elperorr
Apparently someone built an automated platform where multiple addresses send $KAS back and forth to each other. Every transaction requires paying the network fee (currently 0.000023 KAS), and it's currently running at 170 TPS. The platform is @Kaspadrome, you can add some KAS to fuel the transaction cycle, temporarily boost the throughput etc... This is incredibly clever—both as an additional app for using Kaspa and as a tool for anyone to test the network’s capabilities.
English

@lunfardo314 @Kaspadrome Not when the TPS and BPS is high just like it is with Kaspa. You can't run a solana node on a 16GB RAM and 256GB SSD laptop.
English

@elperorr @Kaspadrome That does not include the resource that contributes to the security of the consensus: mining. Syncing the state does not require much resources anyway, Kaspa or not
English

If you want to surge Kaspa TPS to around 3000 TPS. Send a couple KAS to this address.
kaspa:qzg49fejq8jlc29jd86746zye3ta2fgvd36hkv8k4k8r3ur6gks5y0fa938dt
Then go view an explorer and watch TPS fly because of your 10 cent contribution.
I don’t know who is behind kaspadrome.xyz … It definitely uses a modified version of the bot used for the world record.
Amazing work. #Kaspa
English

@mateuskaspa @Kaspadrome The fees gets automatically higher when the mempool is full since the priority is automatically given to txns paying high fees, so at somepoint the attacker making thousands of transaction to perform such attack would be spending too much in fees for no reason.
English

@elperorr @Kaspadrome While the attacker would technically be subsidizing miners through fees, is the economic cost actually high enough to serve as a meaningful deterrent?
English

@elperorr @Kaspadrome If transaction fees are negligible, what prevents an attacker from launching a massive spam campaign-perhaps by deploying thousands of high-traffic sites like this one-to congest the network?
English
elperor ری ٹویٹ کیا

Apparently someone built an automated platform where multiple addresses send $KAS back and forth to each other.
Every transaction requires paying the network fee (currently 0.000023 KAS), and it's currently running at 170 TPS.
The platform is @Kaspadrome, you can add some KAS to fuel the transaction cycle, temporarily boost the throughput etc...
This is incredibly clever—both as an additional app for using Kaspa and as a tool for anyone to test the network’s capabilities.

English

















