julietenglish

534 posts

julietenglish banner
julietenglish

julietenglish

@homeedsupport

Veteran home educator in the UK serving home educators by offering support, resources and information. https://t.co/zrh6Pbwkyk

شامل ہوئے Mart 2017
93 فالونگ454 فالوورز
Nat Wei
Nat Wei@NatWei·
Parents need to be aware - the state is dangerously close to finalising over-reaching powers to bring in Digital ID for under 18s, monitoring all online use and creating the right to implement digital curfews. @BigBrotherWatch politico.eu/article/uk-eye…
English
2
9
14
368
julietenglish
julietenglish@homeedsupport·
@KevTwitta @LBC @AliMirajUK You say that as if exam results are the only way to measure success? There are so many paths to "successful" adulthood. Richard Branson is a prime example of this. School attendance does not equal education.
English
2
0
0
17
LBC
LBC@LBC·
'All my friends are jealous I'm able to make that choice.' 15-year-old Jasmin has been homeschooled for the past three years and shares her experience with @AliMirajUK.
English
9
2
12
10.8K
julietenglish
julietenglish@homeedsupport·
@fionajnicholson It’s absolutely shocking that peers don’t see the implications of her amendment.
English
1
0
1
12
julietenglish
julietenglish@homeedsupport·
CWS Bill Report Stage in HOL. Can't help but be annoyed that gov seem to think that, even though parents pay taxes that fund schools, home educators should not expect assistance to access exams. Tightfisted when it suits! parliamentlive.tv/event/index/d2…
English
0
0
0
19
Bridget Phillipson
Bridget Phillipson@bphillipsonMP·
We’re creating good, local schools with specialist SEND places and well trained teachers and support staff. Needs met Parents involved Children thriving Support without a fight That is Labour’s vision for a renewed SEND system.
English
325
68
226
26K
julietenglish
julietenglish@homeedsupport·
@bphillipsonMP Ummm, is this the same minister that silences negative comments on her posts? That's the kind of nasty you find under totalitarian governments, so no wonder you're performing so badly in the polls!
English
0
0
2
10
Bridget Phillipson
Bridget Phillipson@bphillipsonMP·
We now have two versions of the nasty party in Britain, and they're both competing to see who can be nastier. Only Labour takes action to make sure your background doesn't determine what you can go on to achieve. Only Labour will tackle child poverty. inews.co.uk/news/politics/…
English
1.6K
123
507
90.7K
julietenglish ری ٹویٹ کیا
Nat Wei
Nat Wei@NatWei·
The government recently refused to help home ed families get better local access to sit exams. With extra cost and bureaucracy in the CSW Bill linked to home ed & Budget cuts, will more schools/centres be forced to deny families/children this basic right? schoolsweek.co.uk/home-education…
English
0
17
32
862
julietenglish
julietenglish@homeedsupport·
LA's seem to have great difficulty knowing how to do their jobs properly, even when they have all the power they need. Badly written law + inept LA's is a recipe for harm and harassment. We need to stop the CWS Bill now!
Nat Wei@NatWei

Today’s LCSP review: Sara Sharif’s murder was committed by her father and not prevented due to serious LA safeguarding errors. Home education was not to blame. Yet the same overstretched LAs will now oversee new home-ed registers. Will this prevent harm or cause more errors?

English
0
3
4
82
julietenglish
julietenglish@homeedsupport·
@NatWei Thank you so much for highlighting that this is purely down to LA safeguarding failure. If they cannot protect a child that they already know about, why would a so-called "register" magically get them to do the job they are already empowered to do?
English
0
4
11
92
Nat Wei
Nat Wei@NatWei·
Today’s LCSP review: Sara Sharif’s murder was committed by her father and not prevented due to serious LA safeguarding errors. Home education was not to blame. Yet the same overstretched LAs will now oversee new home-ed registers. Will this prevent harm or cause more errors?
English
14
48
59
2.6K
julietenglish ری ٹویٹ کیا
Nat Wei
Nat Wei@NatWei·
"Buried inside the Children’s [...] Bill lies the blueprint for Starmer’s surveillance state. [It] convert[s] every child’s NHS number into a digital tag linking their school records, medical[...]and family details into one government-controlled network" citizengo.org
English
0
13
12
299
julietenglish ری ٹویٹ کیا
Michelle Dewberry
Michelle Dewberry@MichelleDewbs·
I don’t get this concept of us parents being ‘out of pocket’ by giving our own children breakfast. Isn’t feeding our own kids a basic premise of parenting responsibility, why would any parent regard themselves ‘out of pocket’ for doing so🤔
UK Prime Minister@10DowningStreet

Parents shouldn’t be out of pocket by setting their children up for school. That’s why we are rolling out free breakfast clubs and from next September, schools will be required to limit branded items of uniform. Saving families £500 and giving kids the best start in life.

English
1.5K
2.3K
18.8K
639.7K
julietenglish
julietenglish@homeedsupport·
At least 4 barristers (and I know of a 5th) have provided legal opinions that confirm that the Children's Wellbeing & Schools Bill is discriminatory, and could be challenged legally if it passes as is. Take off the blinkers and earplugs and start listening @bphillipsonMP . /2
English
2
6
8
87
julietenglish
julietenglish@homeedsupport·
I had the joy of joining the @stopthecwsbill protest yesterday in London. @UKLabour want to dismiss the march as "sparsely attended", but remember that for each one that attended, there are at least 10,000 people who feel the same! #AreYouListeningNow /1
English
3
6
10
166
julietenglish ری ٹویٹ کیا
Alison Widdup
Alison Widdup@AlisonWiddup·
IMPORTANT! There's currently no checks and balances to protect families from ultra vires LA behaviour. If this Bill becomes law, there still won't but stakes will be higher with prison if home ed families don't comply with bullying LAs @Keir_Starmer @bphillipsonMP @_RobbieMoore
The Critic@TheCriticMag

“The parents I spoke to … had been let down, bullied and lied to by the authorities” — @JSMilbank defends home educators thecritic.co.uk/nationalising-…

English
1
4
7
149
julietenglish ری ٹویٹ کیا
Nat Wei
Nat Wei@NatWei·
It's time to pause and reflect on the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill, contravenes ECHR Article 14 according to KC Aiden O'Neill. Read more in the long version of my speech below and repost to your local MP/Peer and Advisors. (5/5) tinyurl.com/ProtectHE @LabourList
English
3
52
66
1.4K
julietenglish ری ٹویٹ کیا
Nat Wei
Nat Wei@NatWei·
It is a matter of historic record that when Parliament passed the Education Act of 1944, it deliberately safeguarded the right of parents — not the state — to determine their children’s education, as a bulwark against totalitarianism. (4/5) @LabourList
English
0
52
61
1.6K
julietenglish ری ٹویٹ کیا
Square Peg
Square Peg@teamsquarepeg·
Agreed. We must be so careful in commodifying children as assets, eroding the importance of childhood in and of itself, not as a hothouse for a future we can neither predict nor control. Parents feel it deeply. Children and teens need the chance to be present, to explore, develop, experiment, fail, evolve, play, think, rest, thrive. EYFS is not about school readiness. School readiness is not about industrialised employment. It’s about so much more. When we only focus on the destination, we lose sight of the value and importance of the journey itself.
English
3
15
61
3.4K