marginofdanger

2.2K posts

marginofdanger banner
marginofdanger

marginofdanger

@marginofdanger

Sharing my personal views, not investment advice. Please do your own work.

شامل ہوئے Kasım 2022
118 فالونگ7.3K فالوورز
پن کیا گیا ٹویٹ
marginofdanger
marginofdanger@marginofdanger·
This year I present a handful of my top ideas for 2026 (in alphabetical order of tickers). Some of these names are fairly uncorrelated with the market (and a few definitely are not). As a reminder please do your own work and be mindful of the low trading liquidity in many of these. $BWEL JG Boswell at $459/share (LOW RISK / HIGH REWARD) JG Boswell has been the deep value stock that even the most disciplined investors have lost patience with (including yours truly!). Despite the last year being horrible for both tomatoes and cotton, $BWEL put up ~$40mm of adj. EBITDA. It is extremely rare for both of its core crops to be bad at the same time (i.e., something good should happen with one of them this year) and their pistachio crop will generate increasingly material cash flow for the next 10 years as it matures. Creation value per acre is around ~$3k (or lower) depending on your assumptions which compares to FMV of $15k/acre. There's a lot of room for the stock to appreciate and still trade poorly! $MLP Maui Land & Pineapple at $17 (LOW RISK / HIGH REWARD) This name has seen a recent cluster of insider buying by the CEO (Race Randle), Chairman (Scot Sellers) and controling shareholder (Steve Case). The company's undiscounted land value is ridiuclously high relative to its stock price (like 8-15x) but the open question is the time to monetize. In a frothy stock market, this seems like an interesting, low risk place to deploy capital. $PLAY Dave & Buster's at $16 (MEDIUM RISK / VERY HIGH REWARD) Dave & Buster's is in the midst of a turnaround, with tangible signs of progress, but an exasperated investor base. Valuation is ~4.5x EBITDA which compares to its long history of 6-10x+ EBITDA. It's also worth pointing out that within this business is a bowling business called Main Event which is ~half of the company's TEV and worth ~8-10x if sold separately. $PLAY is going through a capital intensive remodel phase (with mixed results). The company recently put in a new CEO and results are turning, but the street is rightly worried about the staying power of the improvement. 2026 could be disappointing on the topline, but my gut is that there is a lot of low hanging fruit that will result in nicely improving results in 2026. There are no near-term liquidity issues and this is a nice multi-year option. I think it's highly asymmetric, wherein downside should be limited given b/s duration + low hanging fruit on costs with colossal upside on any real turnaround (every ~1x EV/EBITDA revaluation upward is around 100% on the stock). Don't waste your time on this one if you can't handle the volatility. $TIPT Tiptree at $18.27 (SAFE PLACE TO PARK CASH) This is by far my lowest beta pick. $TIPT is essentially doing the opposite of a de-SPAC. It is morphing from an operating company to a cash shell. It has agreements to sell its assets and will have $24.60/share in net tangible book value upon closing of Fortegra in 1H26. Post closing, the company will return the cash, make a large acquisition or a combination thereof. One of $TIPT's directors recently bought stock at $18.21/share and most importantly insiders own ~35% of the company. Upon completion of the Fortegra divestiture, I expect this to pull toward 85-95% of TBV ($20.91-23.37/share) representing a 14-28% return. Further upside potential when they announce an acquisition. If this were a true SPAC (with a 24 month put) I think this management team would trade at a premium. $WEBC Webco at $218 (warning: VERY ILLIQUID) Webco ended the year near its ATH, however, it is incredibly cheap at ~0.5x TBV and ~4x EBITDA. About a year ago, the company did a privately negotiated buyback of ~15% of its stock at $200, which was a premium to the prevailing $185/share trading price. No surprise, but in the last few quarters, the results have turned and the company should generate meaningful FCF in 2026. I believe the take private valuation for this company is ~$350-400/share. And a few other old favorites that I'll throw in here: $CBBI CBB Bancorp at $11 (LOW RISK + HIGH REWARD) This name has been discussed on FinX extensively and I'm not going to break new ground here. But I will say that the new board member gives me some hope that something will happen in the name in the short-term. $FMBL at $8,349 + $QUCT at $2,100. (LOW RISK) Both of these names had an amazing 2025 due to the company taking shareholder friendly actions (for FMBL, raising a $200mm pref, for QUCT signalling asset sales and having improved results). Both of these names continue to very cheap relative to their take private valuations. And, due to conservatively positioned balance sheets they both have little downside. $FPH at $5.59 (LOW RISK + HIGH REWARD) It feels like hubris to re-recommend $FPH as a top pick for the upcoming year and I do think that at this price it's not as interesting (obviously). However, there are a lot of good catalysts coming with this name, including the announcement of JV partners in both Valencia and SF and the potential favorable resolution of the litigation against $TTEK (in addition to continued high value land sales in Irvine). $10-15/share continues to be where I think this goes to over time.
English
7
4
119
20.2K
marginofdanger
marginofdanger@marginofdanger·
@Ron284Ron Nice results out of $LICT. One of the more solid value situations that most other OTC investors have neglected.
English
0
0
1
140
marginofdanger
marginofdanger@marginofdanger·
Big special dividend at $BOIVF but no stock movement on it. Anyone have a view?
English
1
0
2
2.6K
marginofdanger
marginofdanger@marginofdanger·
$HHH I spoke with an insurance team CEO yesterday who told me that @BillAckman overpaid for Vantage by $400-500mm and that its combined ratio was pretty high for rather benign market conditions. And, Ackman is also responding to AI women on X. Meanwhile the stock is now below the $66 threshold that was used as the base for Pershing Square's incentive fees. The guy seems like he's on some sort of life tilt and feels pressures to IPO Pershing Square right now. The best thing that Ackman could do with $HHH (unfortunately can't undo Vantage buy) would be to initiate a dividend because otherwise this is a boring company that will behave with the volatility of owning a zero coupon bond on margin.
marginofdanger tweet media
English
7
3
41
18.7K
marginofdanger
marginofdanger@marginofdanger·
Open market purchase by $TIPT CFO
marginofdanger tweet media
English
0
0
6
1.3K
BoujeeBanker
BoujeeBanker@boujee_banker·
@marginofdanger @BillAckman There is some partial logic to it. The more permanent your time horizon, the higher your multiple right? And the better you can improve the business, in this case reallocating the investment portfolio towards higher returning equities, the higher your expected ROE is.
English
1
0
1
224
BoujeeBanker
BoujeeBanker@boujee_banker·
@marginofdanger @BillAckman Cringe that I am even typing this, BUT didn’t Ackman say that $HHH had the ability to pay a higher price for an insurer given it’s permanent capital as well as ability to extract higher returns via its speciality in equity investing
English
2
0
2
542
marginofdanger
marginofdanger@marginofdanger·
@partners_road It’s really cheap, interesting that it traded up on earnings. Feels bombed out.
English
1
0
2
1.1K
RiverRoadPartners
RiverRoadPartners@partners_road·
V interesting to see record-high system-wide guest satisfaction scores at Vail Resorts $MTN in spite of a v disappointing weather environment in ‘25/‘26. I owned Belmond Hotels when it was acquired by LVMH in ‘19; I’m not sure you can write off possible interest in Vail Resorts.
English
5
0
30
7.9K
marginofdanger
marginofdanger@marginofdanger·
@Crawdad_Capital lol, dude if you agree it’s likely to go to 21.5, what are we arguing about?
English
1
0
0
161
Crawdad Capital
Crawdad Capital@Crawdad_Capital·
@marginofdanger I mean sure … it might trade up to 21.5… I’m not arguing against that - best of luck to you, but I think there are better r/rs out there (you also mentioned the potential for them buying a business with the cash…). Yeah is a share buyback possible.. sure.
English
1
0
0
75
marginofdanger
marginofdanger@marginofdanger·
$TIPT letter to shareholders. Stock was down 5% today to $16.17/share. Meanwhile, there will be $24.40/share of net cash sitting on B/S shortly, with mgmt owning 34% of the company. Mgmt could literally generate a 50% return for shareholders by simply returning the cash or finding a deal that trades at book value. Note founding principle #4 in the attached letter.
marginofdanger tweet mediamarginofdanger tweet media
English
2
3
39
10.2K
marginofdanger
marginofdanger@marginofdanger·
@Crawdad_Capital You are emotionally skewed due to your (incorrect) view that they made a bad deal by selling Fortegra at 4x book value. This is a dollar bill selling at 70c - that’s the thesis.
English
1
0
1
169
Crawdad Capital
Crawdad Capital@Crawdad_Capital·
@marginofdanger so your thesis is they are going to buy something good (even though they already had something good) and sell it for a good price this time? There’s an old saying: “Fool me once, shame on... shame on you. Fool me—you can't get fooled again” - George Bush
English
1
0
0
90
marginofdanger
marginofdanger@marginofdanger·
Curious timing given Pershing Square fund performance highly negative YTD and the only controlled position $HHH at its lows. Would love to see you think more creatively at $HHH and creativity isn’t buying a newly created insurance business for $2bn, crystallizing a nice profit for Hellman and Friedman and Carlyle—-greenfielding an insurance business would have been a much better deal for $HHH shareholders given the new fees there.
English
2
0
15
2.9K
Bill Ackman
Bill Ackman@BillAckman·
Today, Pershing Square Inc. (PSI), an alternative asset management company, filed to go public along with Pershing Square USA, Ltd. (PSUS) a new closed ended investment company managed by Pershing Square.    In the combined offering, investors in the IPO of PSUS will receive shares in PSI for no additional consideration. For example, if an investor buys 100 shares of PSUS in the IPO, they will receive 20 shares of PSI at no additional cost.    I explain the transaction in detail in a letter that can be found here:   sec.gov/Archives/edgar… [sec.gov]   The prospectus for PSI can be found here:   sec.gov/Archives/edgar… [sec.gov]   And the prospectus for PSUS can be found here:   sec.gov/Archives/edgar… [sec.gov] The PSI and PSUS Registration Statements have not yet become effective.  The securities described therein may not be sold, nor may offers to buy be accepted, prior to the time the Registration Statements become effective.  Before you invest in the combined offering, you should read the Registration Statements for more complete information about the PSI, PSUS, and the combined offering.
English
409
179
2.4K
573K
marginofdanger
marginofdanger@marginofdanger·
Yeah, the structure of the transaction was not friendly to shareholders relative to selling the whole business. However, there was no bid for the whole business, the bid was for Fortegra. They also had Warburg Pincus owning some of that asset too. They own a lot of stock so their incentives are mostly aligned with shareholders, notwithstanding the economics they will take in the new transaction. Lot of room for the stock to work and for mgmt to get their fill.
English
1
0
0
235
Crawdad Capital
Crawdad Capital@Crawdad_Capital·
@marginofdanger Did you see how TIPT structured this transaction? They literally could not care less about shareholders. This cash is going to be used for C-suite bonuses
English
3
1
2
475