Motahhare Eslami

John Zimmerman presenting at #CHI2025 Catch him and Ask about our AI Literacy paper — best paper honorable mention @meslami2 We thank @d19fe8 @koedinger @amyogan @HanZiyuh @du_yanlin for their feedback on this journey. programs.sigchi.org/chi/2025/progr…

Excited to share our workshop on Responsible Crowdsourcing for Responsible Generative AI at @hcomp_conf ’24 ✨ Apply to join a group of organizers from industry, civil society, and academia to discuss topics on engaging crowds in AI audit!! See more at …sponsible-genai-crowd-audit.github.io

@scyrusk I haven't got there yet! but will let you know if I got:D

Hey fellow academics, have you ever had the feeling that "you've made it"? If so, what made you feel that way?

Excited to share our @ACM_CSCW 23 in-person workshop on ✨supporting user engagement in testing, auditing, and contesting AI✨. We plan to have a set of engaging activities for attendees! Please visit cscw-user-ai-auditing.github.io for workshop information and the submission form!

Tech companies increasingly engage users in testing AI systems for harmful behaviors (e.g., through user reporting & bias bounties). Excited to share our #CHI23 work that explores current practices, challenges, opportunities, & risks around user-engaged algorithm auditing. (1/9)

@mark_riedl Wow, so sorry to hear that; I once got a 1.5 CHI review and I'm still thinking about it:( thanks for sharing this that such things happen less to people...

I once received a review of a paper (another conference) in which the reviewer stated that my paper should not have been written and that no one should work on the research I was working on. As a pre-tenure assistant professor it was devastating at the time...

Hey @IJCAIconf this is a really rude paper reviewing score classification.

@eegilbert Ah, sorry to hear that Eric :( hope you feel better soon

I tested positive too after #chi2022. Looking back, I thought the _conference itself_ was one of the safest things I did last week.

@syardi This is great, thanks Sarita for doing this. I know @uhleeeeeeeshuh @wes_deng @seyunkim_hci would love to talk to you if there'd be space

@dmetaxak I'm so sorry to hear that Danaë. This takes a lot of courage; thanks for stepping up. I can't imagine what you've gone through, but what you did has saved many who might have gone through the same painful experience in the future. So proud of you

If you're interested in detecting and mitigating harmful algorithmic biases, this is a study to sign up :) Thanks.

@eshwar_chan @IllinoisCS @Illinois_Alma Congrats Eshwar :)

🎉🎊😎 I'm super excited to announce that I'll be starting as an Assistant Professor of Computer Science at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in Fall 2020!!! 🎉🎊😎 @IllinoisCS @Illinois_Alma

@snchancellor haha, I always do that, and am happy to hear I'm not alone :D

Does anyone else just go straight to their own website to find/read previous papers papers because it's way slower to find them in any reference manager? Asking for a friend....

@DavLedo Hi David, I'm Motahhare, a PhD student at UIUC, and I was wondering if I could use this picture in my talk today at CHI if you're ok with it. Thanks :)

Lining up to see talks? 😯 #CHI2019

@uppajung @Hotwire I'm studying such misrepresentations in rating algorithms, but for this one I think it's possible that a multi-factor rating causes this.

@uppajung @Hotwire Can't it because the customers rate more than one factor about their stay, and one could not like one feature but liked the other features?