Nowicanjoin

@IanRunkle It’s so boring. These people need lives. They are sitting at a computer in front of a mound of mashed potatoes…isn’t that how Depp described them?

The anti- crowd are tiring. It's the same playbook: Troll for a block, crow about the block. It's like the greatest thing they can aspire to is not being persuasive, just being pests.

@C_3C_3 Now do the rest of Congress

And just like that… Ilhan Omar’s $30 million winery is gone. Poof. Like it never existed. Fraud.

@TheMissyLerch Who cares what you think?

See, LYK thinks that if Karen and TB had a “good faith” basis to believe what they were saying/pushing was true, it is not defamation. This is simply not the case. In Massachusetts, simply believing a statement is true is not enough to shield someone from defamation liability because truth is not an absolute defense if actual malice (defined as "malevolent intent" or "ill will") is proven, particularly in private matters. Under M.G.L. c. 231 § 92, a truthful statement can still result in liability if published with malicious intent, distinguishing Massachusetts from many jurisdictions. Look up Noonan vs. Staples where actual malice includes “ill-will”. This is a case where even malice “ill-will” trumped even the truth. But, anyone with half a brain knows that TB’s, and Karen’s (through TB) statements were not true. Under Massachusetts law, defamation requires proving five elements: (1) a false statement of fact, (2) about the plaintiff, (3) published to a third party without privilege, (4) with at least negligence by the defendant, and (5) either causing economic loss or qualifying as defamation per se. Defenses are truth, opinion, privilege and sometimes retraction. You can’t sue someone for saying they are “crazy” for example. You can sue someone for saying “has a documented mental disorder” if this false. If you state something as fact, “this person is a murderer” vs “I believe with the evidence I have seen that this person might have committed the crime”. The latter is an opinion. Words matter. Some categories of false statements—called libel per se or slander per se—are so widely understood to be harmful that they are presumed to be injuries. Examples include statements that falsely claim that someone: 1) committed a crime 2) has an infectious disease (often a sexually transmitted infection) 3) lacks professional integrity or competence, or 4) engaged in improper sexual conduct. Then, you have public vs. private individuals. Public figures must show that they were defamed with actual malice. In other words, they must show that the person who defamed them made the false statement knowing it was false, or with reckless disregard for the truth. Public figures include politicians, movie stars, professional athletes, and celebrities. Private figures only need to show that the person who defamed them acted negligently(carelessly) when making the false statement. So, my prediction is that TB is listening to YouTube lawyers and he is going to double down on the evidence that he thinks makes the witnesses culpable and double down on his statements. He’s wrong🤣

@BrotherCounsel @LawyerYouKnow Isn’t there something else, anything else, to talk about? You content creators are too invested in the circular firing squad of commenting on each other’s comments. There’s nothing to learn here. Just so boring.

Well, that was our point, Julie—to amuse you. @LawyerYouKnow and I are just making our best pitch to get on your show.

BREAKING: A Virginia Circuit Court has just ruled yesterday's redistricting vote UNCONSTITUTIONAL, and has issued an injunction BLOCKING the results from being certified, per @KenCuccinelli This is BIG. It’s NOT over yet! 🔥 It's very likely this will end up at the state Supreme Court, who will make the final decision. Keep fighting!

@WDWActiveCrime What will it take before WDW limits Alcohol consumption in the parks? I think I know the answer, sadly.

🚨 EPCOT Arrest (April 21, 2026) Guest accused of grabbing & shaking a Cast Member during an Encanto meet-and-greet. wdwactivecrime.com/articles/alleg…

@RealJamesWoods The uniparty won. Citizens lost, again.

Republicans lose, because they don’t want to win. Arguing with Democrats is like appeasing a drunk. No matter what you say or do, they always have an answer. And when you finally put your foot down, they cover their ears and scream like a toddler.

A damning new public records request shows that Greg Connor was very involved in the Karen Read prosecution, and he lied about it. 🗣 In February 2026, when he announced his run for District Attorney, Norfolk County Chief Trial Counsel Greg Connor said he had no involvement in the Karen Read case or the murder investigation into John O’Keefe. He even pointed to the fact that Hank Brennan was brought in as a special prosecutor for the second trial, as if that cleared him completely. Spoiler: It doesn’t. Because if Connor truly had nothing to do with this case, especially the second prosecution, then why are there 7,428 emails after the July 2024 mistrial? That is not a small number. That is not someone on the sidelines. That is someone actively involved. We already saw him sitting in the courtroom during trial one, taking notes. At the time, it seemed minimal. Now it looks like that was just what was visible. The emails tell a much bigger story, and it directly contradicts what he told the public. This is a major credibility problem for Connor. You cannot say you had no involvement when the records suggest the opposite. 🤯 Connor held a public-facing role and his communications are subject to public records laws. He knew that. Which makes this even worse, because it shows a willingness to say one thing publicly while doing another behind the scenes. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Connor is shaping up to be Morrissey 2.0. If people are not paying attention when they vote, we will see more Karen Read’s in the future.

@BrianEntin But Richard Allen was sent to prison…not jail…for allegedly murdering two girls.

Anna Kepner's stepbrother -- accused of raping and murdering the 16-year-old on a Carnival Cruise -- waived his appearance in Federal court today and entered a not guilty plea. He still has not spent a night in jail and is living with an uncle. youtube.com/watch?v=M8KTmo…

@Williamjkelly @cookerann Wow. What 16 YO is running their social media?

Looks like NBC Chicago took this down but how embarrassing. 😳 H/T @cookerann

@JennyENicholson I’ll wait for it to come to Disney+.

The energy in this clip is so strange, I think it's mostly all the cutaways to Baby Yoda slowing the momentum but probably if you work there and you ever suggest not showing Baby Yoda you get fired

Pass the SAVE America Act. Require voter ID. Require proof of citizenship. Secure our elections.

@LeaderJohnThune Have you seen that your approval rating is under 50%? Pass the SAVE America Act.

@LeaderJohnThune @POTUS Republicans are doing nothing to secure our elections. It’s been 112 days that we’ve been asking you to pass the SAVE America Act.

@SenateGOP We’ve been asking for the SAVE America Act for 112 days.

@BrianEntin Before Kohberger was identified, Drs Brucato and Burgess had a profile that was spot on for Kohberger. They are amazing and fascinating to listen to. I always learn something when I watch them on YT.

Blown away by the intelligence of this group and their ability to get into the criminal mind. Dr. Ann Burgess Dr. Gary Brucato Dr. Casey Jordan More on an upcoming project soon.

Report: SAVE Act (mostly) dead in Senate thanks to Republican leadership notthebee.com/ta648

BREAKING NEWS: Top U.S. Nuclear Chief Caught LEAKING Sensitive National Security Information to Stranger, Reveals Army Chemist Was Exposed to U.S. Chemical Nerve Agent, Confirms U.S. Strike Killed Children in Iran, Discloses U.S. Plans to ‘Kill Iran’s New Supreme Leader’ “If he [Mojtaba Khamenei] doesn't change his ways, yeah, they're [United States] going to kill him.” “The easiest way to get intelligence…send a pretty girl, talk to the guy…I have to resist your eyes.” “Your eyes have mesmerized me so much…Almost like you're an intelligence.” Andrew Hugg, a U.S. Chief of Chemical Nuclear Surety, was caught on hidden camera casually revealing sensitive information to a stranger in a public restaurant. Andrew Hugg, Chief of Chemical Nuclear Surety, in charge of nuclear and chemical safety was caught on hidden camera releasing information regarding the U.S. Nuclear Information. He claims the U.S. still possesses nerve agents and says a U.S. Army chemist recently died from exposure. He also acknowledges U.S. airstrikes have killed children in Iran, calling it “collateral damage,” and revealed to the journalist how nuclear launch decisions are made in real time. Hugg described how the United States could assassinate Iran’s next leader if he “doesn’t change,” while admitting the U.S. has no plans to use nuclear weapons: “We’re not going to nuke anybody.” All of this was casually revealed to an undercover journalist in a restaurant. This raises serious questions about this official's judgment, security, and what’s really happening behind closed doors. We have reached out to the Pentagon and U.S. Army for comment and they are working on a response. @USArmy @DeptofWar

Thank you to all the voters who turned out to vote against this egregious power grab. The race was much closer than the left expected because Virginians know a 10-1 map is not Virginia. I urge the Virginia Supreme Court to rule against this unconstitutional process that will disenfranchise millions of Virginians.

@SenateGOP Senate Republicans are walking away from the SAVE America Act. You ran on election integrity. Now, you’re running away from election integrity. If you don’t pass the SAVE America Act, we are going to DEFEAT Cassidy & Cornyn. Do your job.