ℍ𝕚𝕟𝕕𝕤𝕚𝕘𝕙𝕥 ♟️ ℂ𝕒𝕡𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕝

When evaluating the claim of deep bag-biased Quantum agitpropagandists, it’s always more useful to look at what they are NOT telling you. Recent claims suggest a Quantum computer using neutral atom arrays would require only (!) ~20,000 logical qubits to break Bitcoin. What they tell you is that this is significant because researchers at Caltech recently demonstrated a 6000 (!) logical qubits array. What they do NOT tell you is that those qubits weren’t not entangled, which is a requirement to run Shor’s algorithm. So what is the state of the art in terms of actually entangled logical qubits under the neutral atoms architecture? NINETY SIX (96) qubits. How long did they maintain coherence? 1-2 seconds. How long did the new Oratomic paper suggest the algorithm they designed should run? DAYS! So not only must state of the art in SIMPLE qubits entanglement increase more than 2 orders of magnitude, their ability to maintain coherence across circuit depth must be preserved ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND times longer than they currently do. Suffice to say they have no idea how to even get there but that shouldn’t get in the way of a headline worthy paper!

Google just published a paper on quantum vulnerabilities in crypto, estimating a 2029 post-quantum transition. Their findings are so sensitive that Google decided to publish a ZK proof instead of the actual circuits. @Google generated their ZK proof using @succinctlabs SP1 zkVM. This is one of the most consequential applications of ZK proofs ever. Responsible disclosure of a novel vulnerability protecting trillions of dollars in digital assets.

A co-author on Google's quantum paper calls himself a "Bitcoin security researcher." He actually works for the Ethereum Foundation. Then at the end of his own thread about breaking Bitcoin's cryptography, he casually drops that "Bitcoin PoW is cooked." Totally unbiased research.

The launch of Aave v4 is not what it seems. It's the direct result of breaking down everything that was good about Aave. Let me expose why this is the case. 24h since AAVE v4 launched generated only 4M in deposits. This is a protocol with over 30 bil in TVL on Ethereum alone. That sits on v3, the one people actually trust and was built by the DAO. If you visit the main page of AAVE today, you'll be presented with: Aave App - an Aave Labs product Aave v4 - an Aave Labs product There was no actual demand for these products, except that they were created to generate income for Aave Labs. Since that went against the DAO interests, the founder and owner of Aave Labs did a hostile takeover by outvoting the other DAO members that protested against these initiatives. He then proceeded to pay himself via a rigged vote 50M in DAO funds to develop a roadmap including the above products. Initially, they wanted to play the DAO game, but since they couldn't get their way, they went ahead and broke the DAO. Now, Aave Labs tells users that every product they are building and 100% of its associated revenue will go to the DAO treasury. That's great, until you realize they control the DAO and can always vote to pay themselves whatever amounts they want. So instead of their products paying Aave Labs directly like they wanted initially, they now use a broken DAO as a cover to pay themselves whenever they want. Unsuspecting users believe everything Aave Labs is building is in the benefit of the DAO and the AAVE token, when in fact that's a smokescreen to syphon money quietly. This conflict of interest caused the recent Aave drama that saw key DAO service providers quit and leave. The ones that actually built and maintained v3 at over 30 bil in TVL. Aave Labs changed the Aave website, which they control, to benefit themselves, created the conflict (perhaps on purpose) so they can take over the DAO and do as they please. They succeeded. This is why we have v4 today. The ones against it were pushed out. If you scroll the Aave website you'll notice v3 gets no attention, besides some links. Moreso, they present v4 as the "pro" version. That's totally misleading. v3 is the actual product that was tested and held strong during times of stress, not v4 which is an untested product from a team that showed gross negligence in the past. For example, a user recently lost 50M using the Aave Labs swap function on their website. Imagine trying to buy a lot of AAVE on their own site and losing all your money. That's who is behind v4. The founder also bought a 30M mansion in one of the fanciest neighborhoods in London most recently. Aave Labs was thirsty for money and this was their solution. It worked. However, people will vote with their money. Time will tell how v4 will do, but I would never touch any product developed by Aave Labs, unless you want to risk your money. Like, share, and follow @duonine

Anthropic accidentally leaked their entire source code yesterday. What happened next is one of the most insane stories in tech history. > Anthropic pushed a software update for Claude Code at 4AM. > A debugging file was accidentally bundled inside it. > That file contained 512,000 lines of their proprietary source code. > A researcher named Chaofan Shou spotted it within minutes and posted the download link on X. > 21 million people have seen the thread. > The entire codebase was downloaded, copied and mirrored across GitHub before Anthropic's team had even woken up. > Anthropic pulled the package and started firing DMCA takedowns at every repo hosting it. > That's when a Korean developer named Sigrid Jin woke up at 4AM to his phone blowing up. > He is the most active Claude Code user in the world with the Wall Street Journal reporting he personally used 25 billion tokens last year. > His girlfriend was worried he'd get sued just for having the code on his machine. > So he did what any engineer would do. > He rewrote the entire thing in Python from scratch before sunrise. > Called it claw-code and Pushed it to GitHub. > A Python rewrite is a new creative work. DMCA can't touch it. > The repo hit 30,000 stars faster than any repository in GitHub history. > He wasn't satisfied. He started rewriting it again in Rust. > It now has 49,000 stars and 56,000 forks. > Someone mirrored the original to a decentralised platform with one message, "will never be taken down." > The code is now permanent. Anthropic cannot get it back. Anthropic built a system called Undercover Mode specifically to stop Claude from leaking internal secrets. Then they leaked their own source code themselves. You cannot make this up.

@thedefivillain dont worry they're all subsidized and when that stops it will surely have zero negative effect on they're prices or tao

What a great idea to have tokens for each Tao subnet, it definitely won't dilute the buy pressure going into the main token $TAO

JUST IN: Start9 announced an open source router. Open source hardware. Open source firmware. Open source OS. No tracking. No data collection. No hidden code.

@Tradermayne subsidized subnets wHaT cOuLd gO wRoNg ????

Nothing like a conservative 8x return in a global bear market whilst on the brink of WW3.

@0xRacist maybe not the best timing to make the goyim workers think ur food is for a jew

If you go to McDonalds and want their chicken nuggets, order the kosher nuggets. They'll hand-batter real chicken for you (not the pink sludge goyslop) and it's the same price as the regular nuggets

@stacy_muur if ur in files pivot to ram

If you invested $10,000 in Filecoin $FIL in 5 years ago today, you would have $47 today. That would be enough to buy a 10TB hard drive and store your own data like a normal human being.

When I was consulting for @HBO Silicon Valley, zero-loss compression was the holy grail Richard Hendricks chases that perfect middle-out algo could shrink everything w/out breaking a single bit. Google just did something even more practical for the AI era: TurboQuant compresses LLM key-value caches down to 3 bits per value using random orthogonal rotation + PolarQuant scalar quantization & optional 1-bit QJL residual correction. =>> 6× memory reduction, up to 8× faster attention (on H100), & 0 degradation on LongBench, Needle-in-a-Haystack, and RULER for models like Gemma. No retraining, no calibration needed. Fiction just got out-engineered by reality. 😅💚💚

The aboriginal translator

@Bankless absolute fucking morons circle jerk recycled headlines BECAUSE THEY'RE ALL DOWN BAD AND HAVE ZERO EXPOSURE TO BITCOIN, hilarious!

“35% of bitcoins” may be susceptible to attack. That's “millions of bitcoins… 6 or 7 million… hundreds of billions of dollars. “What a quantum computer allows you to do is to go from the public key back to the private key.” All the wallets where the public key has been exposed are at risk. That's why “you will see Satoshi’s coins being drained… once every 10 minutes or so.” - @drakefjustin 👇

You were taught that buying and holding Bitcoin was the solution to all. The real Solution is self custody, running a node, and having some hashrate pointed at that node. This is how we build a perfect system with 0 single points of failure and escape the matrix.

Yesterday, Foundry mined 7 blocks in a row. One company. ~70 minutes. 33% of Bitcoin's hashpower controlled by a single pool. The fix? $2-12/month in electricity. open.substack.com/pub/solosatosh…

🚨Official Solo Satoshi giveaway🚨 We're giving away the most powerful touchscreen Bitcoin miner available. 🔥 Checkout our unveiling video for details! 👇 youtube.com/watch?v=8ztcPs…

Bittensor's biggest subnet receives $52M a year in TAO emissions. It generates $2.4M in actual revenue. Without the subsidy, it would cost more than AWS.

Onlyfans billionaire just Epsteined himself, he read the writing on the wall, probably celebrating together while you all dance on their graves

Today we are launching OWS @OpenWallet - an open standard that unifies how agents interact with wallets. OWS is built open-source with support from: PayPal, OKX, Ripple, Tron, TON, Solana, Ethereum, Base, Polygon, SUI, Filecoin, LayerZero, DFlow, Circle, Uniblock, Virtuals, Arbitrum, Dynamic, Allium, and Simmer Markets Start: openwallet.sh Docs: docs.openwallet.sh Github: github.com/open-wallet-st…

🚨NEWS: Cursor’s $50B “in-house model” is literally Kimi K2.5 with RL on top. Got caught in 24 hours >be Moonshot AI >spend hundreds of millions training Kimi K2.5 >1 trillion parameters, 15 trillion tokens, agent swarm architecture >beat GPT-5.2 and Opus 4.5 on real benchmarks >open-source it because you believe in the ecosystem >one condition: display “Kimi K2.5” if you make over $20M/month from it >Cursor takes the model >runs RL on coding tasks >ships it March 19 as “Composer 2” >blog post: “continued pretraining + scaled reinforcement learning” >zero mention of Kimi K2.5 >“our in-house models generate more code than almost any other LLMs in the world” >publishes benchmark chart >Composer 2 against Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.4 >uses the chart to justify raising at $50 billion! >less than 24 hours later >kimi dev intercepts the API response >model ID: kimi-k2p5-rl-0317-s515-fast >they didn’t even rename it >Moonshot head of pretraining runs tokenizer test >confirms: identical to Kimi’s tokenizer >publicly tags Cursor’s co-founder: “why aren’t you respecting our license?” >two more Moonshot employees post confirmations >all three posts deleted within hours >legal is now involved >but it gets worse >Cursor had Kimi K2.5 listed as a FREE model in their UI just weeks ago >users were openly using it >Feb 9: “K2.5 was in my model list. I updated and it vanished” >it vanished because Cursor pulled it from the picker, and relaunched it as their own model >Moonshot valuation: $4.3B >Cursor valuation: $50B Absolute state of Cursor.